Probiotics Combined With Trimebutine for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16858
Qiu-Xiang Yu, Dong-Dong Wang, Peng-Ju Dong, Li-Hua Zheng
{"title":"Probiotics Combined With Trimebutine for the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Qiu-Xiang Yu, Dong-Dong Wang, Peng-Ju Dong, Li-Hua Zheng","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics combined with trimebutine in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), addressing an important gap in current treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of trimebutine combined with probiotics for the treatment of IBS were collected from various databases. All retrieved articles were screened and assessed for quality. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed following the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The meta-analysis of the included studies was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 RCTs involving 4360 participants were included in this study. Among them, the treatment group consisted of 2177 participants, and the control group consisted of 2183 participants. The results showed that the overall efficacy of trimebutine combined with probiotics in the treatment of IBS was significantly higher than that of trimebutine alone (odds ratio [OR] = 5.09, 95 % confidence interval [CI] [4.19, 6.20], p < 0.00001). The effective rate in the combination therapy group was 93.5 % compared with 73.8 % in the trimebutine alone group. The safety profile was favorable, with adverse event rates of 1.75 % and 1.69 % in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. The most common adverse events were mild and included dry mouth, nausea and dizziness. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. Subgroup analysis based on the type of probiotic intervention showed that combination use was better than trimebutine alone, and the differences between each subgroup were statistically significant. Combination use of compound Lactobacillus capsules had the best effect (OR = 16.03, 95 % CI [4.57, 56.21], p < 0.0001]. These results highlight the potential role of strain-specific benefits in IBS treatment and suggest that probiotic strain selection may significantly influence treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of trimebutine and probiotics is more effective in the treatment of IBS compared with trimebutine alone.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42024516044.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics combined with trimebutine in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), addressing an important gap in current treatment strategies.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of trimebutine combined with probiotics for the treatment of IBS were collected from various databases. All retrieved articles were screened and assessed for quality. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed following the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. The meta-analysis of the included studies was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results: A total of 37 RCTs involving 4360 participants were included in this study. Among them, the treatment group consisted of 2177 participants, and the control group consisted of 2183 participants. The results showed that the overall efficacy of trimebutine combined with probiotics in the treatment of IBS was significantly higher than that of trimebutine alone (odds ratio [OR] = 5.09, 95 % confidence interval [CI] [4.19, 6.20], p < 0.00001). The effective rate in the combination therapy group was 93.5 % compared with 73.8 % in the trimebutine alone group. The safety profile was favorable, with adverse event rates of 1.75 % and 1.69 % in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. The most common adverse events were mild and included dry mouth, nausea and dizziness. No serious adverse events were reported in either group. Subgroup analysis based on the type of probiotic intervention showed that combination use was better than trimebutine alone, and the differences between each subgroup were statistically significant. Combination use of compound Lactobacillus capsules had the best effect (OR = 16.03, 95 % CI [4.57, 56.21], p < 0.0001]. These results highlight the potential role of strain-specific benefits in IBS treatment and suggest that probiotic strain selection may significantly influence treatment outcomes.

Conclusions: The combination of trimebutine and probiotics is more effective in the treatment of IBS compared with trimebutine alone.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42024516044.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
益生菌联合曲美布汀治疗肠易激综合征患者:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究旨在评估益生菌联合曲美布汀治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的有效性和安全性,弥补目前治疗策略的重要空白。方法:从各数据库中收集曲美布汀联合益生菌治疗IBS的随机对照试验(rct)。对所有检索到的文章进行筛选和质量评估。纳入研究的方法学质量按照Cochrane协作网推荐的指南进行评估。采用RevMan 5.3软件对纳入研究进行meta分析。结果:本研究共纳入37项随机对照试验,共纳入4360名受试者。其中,治疗组2177人,对照组2183人。结果显示,曲美布汀联合益生菌治疗IBS的总体疗效显著高于单用曲美布汀(优势比[OR] = 5.09, 95%可信区间[CI] [4.19, 6.20], p)。结论:曲美布汀联合益生菌治疗IBS比单用曲美布汀更有效。临床试验注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符:CRD42024516044。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Current Landscape of Adoptive Cell Therapy and Challenge to Develop "Off-The-Shelf" Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Expression of PCED1A in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer and Its Relationship with Immune Infiltration: Potential as a Diagnostic Marker. Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Asian Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Endogenous Ethanol Production in the Human Alimentary Tract: A Literature Review. Impact of Positive Glucose, Lactose, and Fructose Hydrogen Breath Tests on Symptoms and Quality of Life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1