Comparing Long-Term Infliximab Persistence Following a Switch to a Biosimilar in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: No Cause for Concern

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16916
Paulina Suo, Ashish Srinivasan, Lena Thin, Yoon-Kyo An, Richard G. Fernandes, Simon Ghaly, Angus W. Jeffrey, Shankar Menon, Nicholas Olsen, Thomas Skinner, Daniel R. van Langenberg, James Winston, Craig Haifer
{"title":"Comparing Long-Term Infliximab Persistence Following a Switch to a Biosimilar in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: No Cause for Concern","authors":"Paulina Suo,&nbsp;Ashish Srinivasan,&nbsp;Lena Thin,&nbsp;Yoon-Kyo An,&nbsp;Richard G. Fernandes,&nbsp;Simon Ghaly,&nbsp;Angus W. Jeffrey,&nbsp;Shankar Menon,&nbsp;Nicholas Olsen,&nbsp;Thomas Skinner,&nbsp;Daniel R. van Langenberg,&nbsp;James Winston,&nbsp;Craig Haifer","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Several studies have demonstrated that switching stable patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from originator to biosimilar infliximab is noninferior to continuing originator infliximab. However, “real-world” data comparing long-term outcomes between switch and nonswitch cohorts is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing long-term outcomes in IBD patients across switch and nonswitch cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The SAME study was a multicenter, prospective parallel cohort noninferiority study, that enrolled Australian IBD patients in steroid-free clinical remission on maintenance originator infliximab, who either continued originator infliximab (<i>n</i> = 141) or switched to biosimilar (CT-P13) infliximab (<i>n</i> = 204). Here, we present long-term outcomes, with treatment persistence beyond 48 weeks as the primary outcome. Disease worsening, defined as any of infliximab discontinuation, dose escalation, antibody development, or adverse event, were secondary outcomes of interest.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 345 patients enrolled in the SAME study, 320 (92.7%) patients were followed up beyond 48 weeks (median: 54.2 months [IQR 46.1–59.3]). There were no differences in infliximab discontinuation between switch and nonswitch cohorts (35.3% vs. 37.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.47). Infliximab discontinuation due to disease worsening (21.7% vs. 23.6%), dose escalation (35.2% vs. 32.4%), antibody development (5.3% vs. 11.3%), and infliximab-related adverse events (7.8% vs. 8.3%), were also comparable (all <i>p</i> &gt; 0.70) between switch and nonswitch cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Long-term infliximab persistence was similar between switch and nonswitch cohorts over 4 years of follow-up. These data represent the longest duration of “real-world” follow-up, and should provide further reassurance that nonmedical switching is safe and clinically comparable to ongoing originator infliximab in clinically stable patients with IBD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"40 5","pages":"1174-1181"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgh.16916","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Several studies have demonstrated that switching stable patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from originator to biosimilar infliximab is noninferior to continuing originator infliximab. However, “real-world” data comparing long-term outcomes between switch and nonswitch cohorts is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by comparing long-term outcomes in IBD patients across switch and nonswitch cohorts.

Methods

The SAME study was a multicenter, prospective parallel cohort noninferiority study, that enrolled Australian IBD patients in steroid-free clinical remission on maintenance originator infliximab, who either continued originator infliximab (n = 141) or switched to biosimilar (CT-P13) infliximab (n = 204). Here, we present long-term outcomes, with treatment persistence beyond 48 weeks as the primary outcome. Disease worsening, defined as any of infliximab discontinuation, dose escalation, antibody development, or adverse event, were secondary outcomes of interest.

Results

Of 345 patients enrolled in the SAME study, 320 (92.7%) patients were followed up beyond 48 weeks (median: 54.2 months [IQR 46.1–59.3]). There were no differences in infliximab discontinuation between switch and nonswitch cohorts (35.3% vs. 37.6%, p = 0.47). Infliximab discontinuation due to disease worsening (21.7% vs. 23.6%), dose escalation (35.2% vs. 32.4%), antibody development (5.3% vs. 11.3%), and infliximab-related adverse events (7.8% vs. 8.3%), were also comparable (all p > 0.70) between switch and nonswitch cohorts.

Conclusions

Long-term infliximab persistence was similar between switch and nonswitch cohorts over 4 years of follow-up. These data represent the longest duration of “real-world” follow-up, and should provide further reassurance that nonmedical switching is safe and clinically comparable to ongoing originator infliximab in clinically stable patients with IBD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较炎症性肠病患者改用生物仿制药后英夫利昔单抗的长期持续性:无需担心
简介:多项研究表明,将病情稳定的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者从原研药英夫利西单抗换成生物类似药,效果并不亚于继续使用原研药英夫利西单抗。然而,"真实世界 "中缺乏比较转换组群和非转换组群长期疗效的数据。本研究旨在通过比较换药队列和非换药队列中 IBD 患者的长期疗效来填补这一空白:SAME研究是一项多中心、前瞻性平行队列非劣效性研究,该研究招募了澳大利亚IBD患者,这些患者在使用原研英夫利西单抗维持无类固醇临床缓解后,要么继续使用原研英夫利西单抗(n = 141),要么改用生物仿制药(CT-P13)英夫利西单抗(n = 204)。在此,我们介绍了长期疗效,主要结果是治疗持续超过 48 周。疾病恶化(定义为任何英夫利西单抗停药、剂量升级、抗体发展或不良事件)是我们关注的次要结果:在SAME研究的345名患者中,有320名(92.7%)患者接受了48周后的随访(中位数:54.2个月[IQR 46.1-59.3])。转换组和非转换组之间的英夫利西单抗停药率没有差异(35.3% vs. 37.6%,p = 0.47)。因疾病恶化(21.7% vs. 23.6%)、剂量升级(35.2% vs. 32.4%)、抗体产生(5.3% vs. 11.3%)和英夫利昔单抗相关不良事件(7.8% vs. 8.3%)而停用英夫利昔单抗的比例在转换组和非转换组之间也具有可比性(所有P>0.70):结论:在4年的随访中,换药队列和非换药队列的英夫利西单抗长期耐受性相似。这些数据代表了 "真实世界 "中持续时间最长的随访,应能进一步保证在临床稳定的 IBD 患者中,非药物转换是安全的,其临床效果与持续使用原研药英夫利西单抗相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Ginsenosides as Emerging Adjuvants for Immunotherapy in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Efficacy and Safety of Quadruple Therapy With Semisynthetic Tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Meta-Analysis. Hk2 Promotes Postburn Intestinal Injury by Facilitating Pyroptosis in Intestinal Epithelial Cells Through Enhancing Gsdmc2 Lactylation. Endoscopic Management of Appendiceal Stump Lesions via Transcolonic Access: A Safe and Feasible Minimally Invasive Strategy. Critique on "Development and Validation of a New Prediction Criteria for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Based on Ferroptosis-Related Biomarkers".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1