Simultaneous Luminal and Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Cervical Arteries Using Nonenhanced 3D Quantitative Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29701
Ioannis Koktzoglou, Onural Ozturk, William J Ankenbrandt, Matthew T Walker, Zachary B Bulwa, Fulvio R Gil, William J Ares, Nondas Leloudas, Robert R Edelman
{"title":"Simultaneous Luminal and Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Cervical Arteries Using Nonenhanced 3D Quantitative Quiescent-Interval Slice-Selective Magnetic Resonance Angiography.","authors":"Ioannis Koktzoglou, Onural Ozturk, William J Ankenbrandt, Matthew T Walker, Zachary B Bulwa, Fulvio R Gil, William J Ares, Nondas Leloudas, Robert R Edelman","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Luminal and hemodynamic evaluations of the cervical arteries inform the diagnosis and management of patients with cervical arterial disease.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate a 3D nonenhanced quantitative quiescent interval slice-selective (qQISS) magnetic resonance angiographic (MRA) strategy that provides simultaneous hemodynamic and luminal evaluation of the cervical arteries.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Six healthy volunteers (3 female, 3 male, age = 35.7 ± 10.3 years) and 14 patients with cerebrovascular disease (12 female, 2 male, age = 56.6 ± 14.0 years).</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequences: </strong>3 T, ungated 3D tilted-slab qQISS, pulse-gated 2D phase contrast (PC), ungated 3D PC, and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) gradient-echo protocols.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Four readers scored 29 arterial segments on 3D qQISS volumes for image quality using a 4-point scale (1: non-diagnostic, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: excellent). Time-averaged arterial flow velocities and volume flow rates obtained with qQISS and PC protocols were compared. Arterial lumen area and radius measures obtained with 3D protocols were compared in a subgroup.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Gwet's AC2; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); Pearson's correlation; Bland-Altman. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3D qQISS provided good-to-excellent image quality for depicting the cervical arteries (mean scores of 3.72 ± 0.55, 3.55 ± 0.66, 3.42 ± 0.72, and 3.66 ± 0.73 for readers 1, 2, 3, and 4) with significant inter-reader agreement (AC2 = 0.91, ICC = 0.53) in image scoring, significantly agreed with pulse-gated 2D PC for time-averaged total flow velocity (ICC = 0.83) and volume flow rate (ICC = 0.92), and significantly agreed with 3D PC for total flow velocity (ICC = 0.70), volume flow rate (ICC = 0.91), and component flow velocity (ICC = 0.89). Compared with 3D PC, 3D qQISS better agreed with 3D TOF for arterial lumen area (ICC = 0.97 vs. 0.72) and radius (ICC = 0.94 vs. 0.74).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Nonenhanced 3D qQISS provides high-quality sub-1 mm<sup>3</sup> spatial resolution imaging of the cervical arteries, excellent agreement of arterial structural measures with respect to 3D TOF, and time-averaged hemodynamic data without the need for additional PC imaging.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), a method for depicting blood vessels within the body, can be used to evaluate arterial diseases and disorders of the neck. MRA methods routinely used to evaluate the neck arteries do not measure blood flow speed and volume, while other methods for obtaining this information provide less accurate pictures of arterial structure and are not routinely collected. This article reports a new method for MRA that clearly and efficiently portrays the neck arteries without using injected dyes, and provides measurements of arterial blood flow speed and volume.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Luminal and hemodynamic evaluations of the cervical arteries inform the diagnosis and management of patients with cervical arterial disease.

Purpose: To demonstrate a 3D nonenhanced quantitative quiescent interval slice-selective (qQISS) magnetic resonance angiographic (MRA) strategy that provides simultaneous hemodynamic and luminal evaluation of the cervical arteries.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects: Six healthy volunteers (3 female, 3 male, age = 35.7 ± 10.3 years) and 14 patients with cerebrovascular disease (12 female, 2 male, age = 56.6 ± 14.0 years).

Field strength/sequences: 3 T, ungated 3D tilted-slab qQISS, pulse-gated 2D phase contrast (PC), ungated 3D PC, and 3D time-of-flight (TOF) gradient-echo protocols.

Assessment: Four readers scored 29 arterial segments on 3D qQISS volumes for image quality using a 4-point scale (1: non-diagnostic, 2: fair, 3: good, 4: excellent). Time-averaged arterial flow velocities and volume flow rates obtained with qQISS and PC protocols were compared. Arterial lumen area and radius measures obtained with 3D protocols were compared in a subgroup.

Statistical tests: Gwet's AC2; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); Pearson's correlation; Bland-Altman. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: 3D qQISS provided good-to-excellent image quality for depicting the cervical arteries (mean scores of 3.72 ± 0.55, 3.55 ± 0.66, 3.42 ± 0.72, and 3.66 ± 0.73 for readers 1, 2, 3, and 4) with significant inter-reader agreement (AC2 = 0.91, ICC = 0.53) in image scoring, significantly agreed with pulse-gated 2D PC for time-averaged total flow velocity (ICC = 0.83) and volume flow rate (ICC = 0.92), and significantly agreed with 3D PC for total flow velocity (ICC = 0.70), volume flow rate (ICC = 0.91), and component flow velocity (ICC = 0.89). Compared with 3D PC, 3D qQISS better agreed with 3D TOF for arterial lumen area (ICC = 0.97 vs. 0.72) and radius (ICC = 0.94 vs. 0.74).

Data conclusion: Nonenhanced 3D qQISS provides high-quality sub-1 mm3 spatial resolution imaging of the cervical arteries, excellent agreement of arterial structural measures with respect to 3D TOF, and time-averaged hemodynamic data without the need for additional PC imaging.

Plain language summary: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), a method for depicting blood vessels within the body, can be used to evaluate arterial diseases and disorders of the neck. MRA methods routinely used to evaluate the neck arteries do not measure blood flow speed and volume, while other methods for obtaining this information provide less accurate pictures of arterial structure and are not routinely collected. This article reports a new method for MRA that clearly and efficiently portrays the neck arteries without using injected dyes, and provides measurements of arterial blood flow speed and volume.

Evidence level: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非增强的三维定量静止间隔切片选择磁共振血管造影同时评价颈动脉的腔室和血流动力学。
背景:颈动脉的腔腔和血流动力学评价为颈动脉疾病患者的诊断和治疗提供了依据。目的:展示一种三维非增强定量静止间隔切片选择(qQISS)磁共振血管造影(MRA)策略,该策略可同时对颈动脉进行血流动力学和腔道评估。研究类型:前瞻性。研究对象:健康志愿者6人(女3人,男3人,年龄35.7±10.3岁),脑血管病患者14人(女12人,男2人,年龄56.6±14.0岁)。场强/序列:3t、非门控3D倾斜平板qQISS、脉冲门控2D相衬(PC)、非门控3D PC和3D飞行时间(TOF)梯度回波协议。评估:四名读者对3D qQISS卷上的29条动脉段的图像质量进行评分,评分标准为4分(1:非诊断性,2:一般,3:良好,4:优秀)。比较了qQISS和PC两种方法的时间平均动脉流速和体积流速。在一个亚组中比较3D方案获得的动脉管腔面积和半径测量。统计检验:Gwet’s AC2;类内相关系数;皮尔森相关;Bland-Altman。P值3 d qQISS提供优秀的图像质量描绘颈动脉(平均分数为3.72±0.55、3.55±0.66、3.42±0.72、3.66±0.73为读者1,2,3,4)显著inter-reader协议(AC2 = 0.91,国际商会= 0.53)在图像得分,显著同意pulse-gated 2 d电脑的时均流速(ICC = 0.83)和体积流率(ICC = 0.92),并显著同意3 d电脑总流速(ICC = 0.70),体积流速(ICC = 0.91)、组分流速(ICC = 0.89)。与3D PC相比,3D qQISS与3D TOF在动脉管腔面积(ICC = 0.97 vs. 0.72)和半径(ICC = 0.94 vs. 0.74)上的一致性更好。数据结论:非增强的3D qQISS提供了高质量的亚1 mm3空间分辨率的颈动脉成像,在3D TOF方面动脉结构测量非常一致,时间平均血流动力学数据无需额外的PC成像。磁共振血管造影(MRA)是一种描绘体内血管的方法,可用于评估动脉疾病和颈部疾病。通常用于评估颈部动脉的MRA方法不能测量血流速度和体积,而其他获得该信息的方法提供的动脉结构图像不太准确,也没有常规收集。本文报道了一种新的磁共振成像方法,该方法可以在不使用注射染料的情况下清晰有效地描绘颈部动脉,并提供动脉血流速度和体积的测量。证据等级:2技术功效:第1阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial for "Associations of Central Arterial Stiffness With Brain White Matter Integrity and Gray Matter Volume in MRI Across the Adult Lifespan". Editorial for "Incorporating Radiologist Knowledge Into MRI Quality Metrics for Machine Learning Using Rank-Based Ratings". Associations of Postencephalitic Epilepsy Using Multi-Contrast Whole Brain MRI: A Large Self-Supervised Vision Foundation Model Strategy. Influence of Multiband Technique on Temporal Diffusion Spectroscopy and Its Diagnostic Value in Breast Tumors. Application of Anti-Motion Ultra-Fast Quantitative MRI in Neurological Disorder Imaging: Insights From Huntington's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1