Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2024-0088
Cecile Fourie, Yvonne Botma, Benjamin S Botha
{"title":"Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations.","authors":"Cecile Fourie, Yvonne Botma, Benjamin S Botha","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Moulage plays an important part in enhancing simulation-based learning experience fidelity; however, limited tools exist to measure the fidelity of moulage. The original Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale (MARS) is a possible tool to determine moulage's physical and conceptual fidelity in simulation. Although the MARS was proven reliable and valid in the original context, the authors sought to validate it in South Africa. <b>Methods:</b> Eighty-five third-year undergraduate nursing students at a higher education institution in South Africa completed the MARS after a burn simulation. The Cronbach's coefficient α (alpha) coefficient and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were calculated. <b>Results:</b> The Cronbach's coefficient α (alpha = .87) suggests the MARS is reliable. However, the EFA did not confirm the construct validity of the MARS. <b>Conclusion:</b> The MARS needs to be adapted to measure all types of fidelity, which can in turn be used to determine whether moulage is authentic enough to improve students' learning experience; however, further research is required to determine the validity of the suggested MARS included in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Moulage plays an important part in enhancing simulation-based learning experience fidelity; however, limited tools exist to measure the fidelity of moulage. The original Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale (MARS) is a possible tool to determine moulage's physical and conceptual fidelity in simulation. Although the MARS was proven reliable and valid in the original context, the authors sought to validate it in South Africa. Methods: Eighty-five third-year undergraduate nursing students at a higher education institution in South Africa completed the MARS after a burn simulation. The Cronbach's coefficient α (alpha) coefficient and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were calculated. Results: The Cronbach's coefficient α (alpha = .87) suggests the MARS is reliable. However, the EFA did not confirm the construct validity of the MARS. Conclusion: The MARS needs to be adapted to measure all types of fidelity, which can in turn be used to determine whether moulage is authentic enough to improve students' learning experience; however, further research is required to determine the validity of the suggested MARS included in this article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模印真实性评定量表的探索性因子分析及建议调整。
背景与目的:模塑在提高模拟学习体验的保真度方面发挥着重要作用;然而,有限的工具存在,以衡量印痕的保真度。原始的模塑真实性评级量表(MARS)是确定模塑在模拟中的物理和概念保真度的可能工具。虽然MARS在原始环境中被证明是可靠和有效的,但作者试图在南非验证它。方法:85名南非某高等教育机构护理本科三年级学生在烧伤模拟后完成MARS。计算Cronbach系数α (alpha)系数和探索性因子分析(EFA)。结果:Cronbach′s系数α (α = 0.87)表明MARS是可靠的。然而,EFA没有确认MARS的构造有效性。结论:MARS需要适应各种类型的逼真度测量,进而可以用来确定模印是否足够真实,以改善学生的学习体验;然而,需要进一步的研究来确定本文中建议的MARS的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Extent and Severity of the Concerns of People With an Implanted Cardioverter-Defibrillator. Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale and Proposed Adaptations. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Foot Health Assessment Instrument in Pregnant Women. Instruments Important to Help Increase Diversity Equity and Inclusion. The Italian Version of the Ward Safety and Security Rules Survey for Mental Health Nurses: A Validity Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1