Systematic Review of Intrauterine Contraceptive Use and the Development of Toxic Shock Syndrome.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1177/08971900241313402
Timothy C Hutcherson, Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Michael A Grosshans, Julia Freemire, Eryn Meegan, Virginia Zu, Elana Tal
{"title":"Systematic Review of Intrauterine Contraceptive Use and the Development of Toxic Shock Syndrome.","authors":"Timothy C Hutcherson, Nicole E Cieri-Hutcherson, Michael A Grosshans, Julia Freemire, Eryn Meegan, Virginia Zu, Elana Tal","doi":"10.1177/08971900241313402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this systematic review was to characterize the literature regarding the risk factors associated with the development of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) secondary to the use of intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs), as well as patient outcomes. A literature search was conducted spanning origin through December 12, 2022, using Embase and MEDLINE ALL. Primary literature that discussed development of TSS along with the presence of an IUC were included. Extracted data included study and participant demographics, IUC data, and infection data. Reports were evaluated for risk-of-bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for case reports. Thirteen reports met the eligibility criteria, all of which were case reports involving one patient per case who developed TSS following the insertion of an IUC or in the presence of an IUC. The patients included in the review were women aged 23 to 50 years old. Major outcomes reported included time of IUD insertion, bacteria cultured, and antibiotic therapies administered. A minority of the reports (n = 5) provided data related to recent or prior childbirth, miscarriages, or abortions, some of which were proposed to have contributed to development of TSS. Risk-of-bias assessments identified potential concerns in four domains. This systematic review characterized literature pertaining to IUC use and TSS. There may be a low but possible risk of TSS when using an IUC; generalizability is limited given the low quality of available studies. This study was neither registered nor funded.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"463-472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241313402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to characterize the literature regarding the risk factors associated with the development of toxic shock syndrome (TSS) secondary to the use of intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs), as well as patient outcomes. A literature search was conducted spanning origin through December 12, 2022, using Embase and MEDLINE ALL. Primary literature that discussed development of TSS along with the presence of an IUC were included. Extracted data included study and participant demographics, IUC data, and infection data. Reports were evaluated for risk-of-bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for case reports. Thirteen reports met the eligibility criteria, all of which were case reports involving one patient per case who developed TSS following the insertion of an IUC or in the presence of an IUC. The patients included in the review were women aged 23 to 50 years old. Major outcomes reported included time of IUD insertion, bacteria cultured, and antibiotic therapies administered. A minority of the reports (n = 5) provided data related to recent or prior childbirth, miscarriages, or abortions, some of which were proposed to have contributed to development of TSS. Risk-of-bias assessments identified potential concerns in four domains. This systematic review characterized literature pertaining to IUC use and TSS. There may be a low but possible risk of TSS when using an IUC; generalizability is limited given the low quality of available studies. This study was neither registered nor funded.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫内避孕药具使用与中毒性休克综合征发展的系统综述。
本系统综述的目的是描述与宫内避孕(IUCs)继发中毒性休克综合征(TSS)相关的危险因素以及患者预后的文献特征。使用Embase和MEDLINE ALL进行了从起源到2022年12月12日的文献检索。包括讨论TSS发展以及IUC存在的主要文献。提取的数据包括研究和参与者的人口统计数据、IUC数据和感染数据。使用病例报告的乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估报告的偏倚风险。13份报告符合资格标准,所有报告均为病例报告,每例一例患者在植入IUC后或存在IUC时发生TSS。纳入研究的患者为年龄在23至50岁之间的女性。报告的主要结果包括宫内节育器插入时间、细菌培养和抗生素治疗。少数报告(n = 5)提供了与最近或以前分娩、流产或堕胎有关的数据,其中一些被认为是导致TSS发展的原因。偏倚风险评估确定了四个领域的潜在问题。本系统综述了有关IUC使用和TSS的文献。使用IUC时,可能有低但可能的TSS风险;鉴于现有研究的低质量,通用性是有限的。这项研究既没有注册也没有资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist-Prescribed Hormonal Contraception in North Carolina: An Early Adopter Pilot Study. Community Pharmacists Identification of Gaps in Care - Statin Utilization for Primary Prevention. Lurasidone-Induced Tardive Dyskinesia Reversed With Lithium Therapy: A Case Report. Oral Fluconazole Absorption in a Complicated Post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patient: A Case Report. Impact of Prospective Audit and Feedback by Transitions of Care Pharmacists on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1