Using Transcranial Magnetic Nerve Stimulation to Differentiate Motor and Sensory Fascicles in a Mixed Nerve: Experimental Rat Study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2483-5556
Kota Hayashi, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Yen-Lin Huang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang
{"title":"Using Transcranial Magnetic Nerve Stimulation to Differentiate Motor and Sensory Fascicles in a Mixed Nerve: Experimental Rat Study.","authors":"Kota Hayashi, Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Yen-Lin Huang, David Chwei-Chin Chuang","doi":"10.1055/a-2483-5556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Accurately matching the correct fascicles in a ruptured mixed nerve is critical for functional recovery. This study investigates the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> In all 40 rats, the median nerve in the left upper arm was evenly split into three segments. The rats were separated into two groups. In Group A (20 rats), the segment with the highest amplitude during TMS was selected as the motor neurotizer and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In Group B (20 rats), only the medial one-third segment was selected and transferred without using TMS. The results were compared using grooming tests, nerve electrophysiological studies, muscle tetanus contraction force measurements, muscle weight, and axon counts at 16 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The grooming test showed that Group A performed significantly better than Group B at 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Tetanic muscle contraction force measurements also revealed that Group A had significantly better outcomes than Group B. However, electrophysiological testing, muscle weight, and axon counts showed no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study suggests that TMS can be used to distinguish motor fascicles from sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve. It is desirable to apply this technique intraoperatively to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles for appropriate nerve matching and to select the motor fascicles as a motor neurotizer for functioning free muscle innervation in human mixed nerve injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2483-5556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Accurately matching the correct fascicles in a ruptured mixed nerve is critical for functional recovery. This study investigates the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve.

Methods:  In all 40 rats, the median nerve in the left upper arm was evenly split into three segments. The rats were separated into two groups. In Group A (20 rats), the segment with the highest amplitude during TMS was selected as the motor neurotizer and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In Group B (20 rats), only the medial one-third segment was selected and transferred without using TMS. The results were compared using grooming tests, nerve electrophysiological studies, muscle tetanus contraction force measurements, muscle weight, and axon counts at 16 weeks.

Results:  The grooming test showed that Group A performed significantly better than Group B at 12 and 16 weeks postoperatively. Tetanic muscle contraction force measurements also revealed that Group A had significantly better outcomes than Group B. However, electrophysiological testing, muscle weight, and axon counts showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusion:  This study suggests that TMS can be used to distinguish motor fascicles from sensory fascicles in a mixed nerve. It is desirable to apply this technique intraoperatively to differentiate motor and sensory fascicles for appropriate nerve matching and to select the motor fascicles as a motor neurotizer for functioning free muscle innervation in human mixed nerve injury.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Using Transcranial Magnetic Nerve Stimulation to Differentiate Motor and Sensory Fascicles in a Mixed Nerve: Experimental Rat Study. Social Determinants of Health and Patient-reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction, Using Insurance as a Proxy. Anatomical and Technical Considerations in Fascicular Nerve Transfers for Foot Drop. The Use of Unlisted Billing Codes for Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction and Implications for Code Consolidation. Rehabilitation Program for Postlaryngectomy Patients Following Ileocolon Flap Transfer for Voice Reconstruction: An Essential Part of Success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1