The Impact of Surgical Prehabilitation on Postoperative Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.024
Michael R Kann, Emily Estes, Sangami Pugazenthi, Awinita Barpujari, Vamsi Mohan, James L Rogers, Jayanth A Kashyap, Angela Hardi, Christopher S Graffeo
{"title":"The Impact of Surgical Prehabilitation on Postoperative Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Michael R Kann, Emily Estes, Sangami Pugazenthi, Awinita Barpujari, Vamsi Mohan, James L Rogers, Jayanth A Kashyap, Angela Hardi, Christopher S Graffeo","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prehabilitation (preoperative rehabilitation) encompasses a range of patient health driven interventions with the potential to enhance surgical outcomes. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes across surgical specialties, focusing on physical functionality and postoperative length of stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were queried using the search terms prehabilitation, surgery, and related synonyms. Included publications were original, English-language, full-text studies conducted in the US with a cohort of ≥5 patients undergoing prehabilitation. After title (n = 1817), abstract (n = 1059), and full-text (n = 411) screens, 26 articles met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 included articles, 30.8% (n = 8) assessed oncologic surgeries, 34.6% (n = 9) assessed orthopedic surgeries, 19.2% (n = 5) assessed general surgery procedures, and 15.4% (n = 4) assessed cardiac, colorectal, urologic, and transplant surgeries. Physical function was the most common assessed primary outcome, with 46.2% (n = 12) of studies measuring physical activity, functional status, range of motion, or muscle strength. The outcomes of six-meter walk test, sit-to-stand test, and LOS were reported in 26.9% (n = 7), 23.1% (n = 6), and 19.2% (n = 5) of studies, respectively. Three studies found a significant improvement in the six-meter walk test, and four studies demonstrated a significant improvement in sit-to-stand test after prehabilitation. LOS outcomes had varied results across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve postoperative outcomes, including physical function and LOS in surgical patients. Further research is necessary to identify the most efficacious prehabilitation protocols and determine their optimal impact within diverse surgical subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"165-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.11.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prehabilitation (preoperative rehabilitation) encompasses a range of patient health driven interventions with the potential to enhance surgical outcomes. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes across surgical specialties, focusing on physical functionality and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

Methods: Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were queried using the search terms prehabilitation, surgery, and related synonyms. Included publications were original, English-language, full-text studies conducted in the US with a cohort of ≥5 patients undergoing prehabilitation. After title (n = 1817), abstract (n = 1059), and full-text (n = 411) screens, 26 articles met inclusion criteria.

Results: Of 26 included articles, 30.8% (n = 8) assessed oncologic surgeries, 34.6% (n = 9) assessed orthopedic surgeries, 19.2% (n = 5) assessed general surgery procedures, and 15.4% (n = 4) assessed cardiac, colorectal, urologic, and transplant surgeries. Physical function was the most common assessed primary outcome, with 46.2% (n = 12) of studies measuring physical activity, functional status, range of motion, or muscle strength. The outcomes of six-meter walk test, sit-to-stand test, and LOS were reported in 26.9% (n = 7), 23.1% (n = 6), and 19.2% (n = 5) of studies, respectively. Three studies found a significant improvement in the six-meter walk test, and four studies demonstrated a significant improvement in sit-to-stand test after prehabilitation. LOS outcomes had varied results across studies.

Conclusions: Prehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve postoperative outcomes, including physical function and LOS in surgical patients. Further research is necessary to identify the most efficacious prehabilitation protocols and determine their optimal impact within diverse surgical subpopulations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术前康复对术后患者预后的影响:一项系统综述。
前言:预康复(术前康复)包括一系列患者健康驱动的干预措施,有可能提高手术结果。本系统综述旨在评估康复对各外科专业术后预后的影响,重点关注身体功能和术后住院时间(LOS)。方法:使用预康复、外科手术及相关同义词对Medline、Embase、CINAHL Plus、Cochrane Library、Scopus和Clinicaltrials.gov等数据库进行查询。纳入的出版物是在美国进行的原创、英文、全文研究,研究对象为≥5名接受康复治疗的患者。经过标题(n = 1817)、摘要(n = 1059)和全文(n = 411)筛选,26篇文章符合纳入标准。结果:在纳入的26篇文章中,30.8% (n = 8)评估肿瘤手术,34.6% (n = 9)评估骨科手术,19.2% (n = 5)评估普通外科手术,15.4% (n = 4)评估心脏、结直肠、泌尿外科和移植手术。身体功能是最常见的评估主要结果,46.2% (n = 12)的研究测量了身体活动、功能状态、活动范围或肌肉力量。分别有26.9% (n = 7)、23.1% (n = 6)和19.2% (n = 5)的研究报告了6米步行试验、坐立试验和LOS的结果。三项研究发现,在六米步行测试中有显著改善,四项研究表明,在预适应后,坐立测试有显著改善。LOS结果在不同的研究中有不同的结果。结论:预康复干预有可能改善手术患者的术后预后,包括身体功能和LOS。需要进一步的研究来确定最有效的康复方案,并确定其在不同手术亚群中的最佳影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Postoperative Opioids in Pediatric Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study. A Review of Long-Term Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Using Extended Criteria Donors in the United States. Classification Systems of Surgical Complexity: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Recognizing the Need for Goals of Care Conversations Among Critically Ill Surgical Patients. Immunological Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Conversion Surgery Cases for Gastric Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1