Evaluation of Noise in Paediatric Dentistry and Change in Perception of Operators with Use of Ear Protection Devices.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Noise & Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.4103/nah.nah_72_24
Anshula Neeraj Deshpande, Simron Baishya, Sonali Saha, Vasudha Sodani, Riddhika Shah, Aishwarya Antala
{"title":"Evaluation of Noise in Paediatric Dentistry and Change in Perception of Operators with Use of Ear Protection Devices.","authors":"Anshula Neeraj Deshpande, Simron Baishya, Sonali Saha, Vasudha Sodani, Riddhika Shah, Aishwarya Antala","doi":"10.4103/nah.nah_72_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noise sources in paediatric dental offices include machinery and children's cries and screams. Although the presence of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) among dental operators is established, preventive measures such as ear protection devices (EPDs) are not frequently employed as prophylactic intervention. The primary aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the noise levels in paediatric dental clinics and to qualitatively evaluate the operators' perception of noise with and without the use of EPDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A crossover study was conducted with 93 operators; half of whom first worked without EPD, and the other half worked with EPD. Sound produced near each operator was recorded in decibels (dBs) for five working days, and the maximum sound in decibel for each day was noted and averaged. The results were then compared with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) exposure limits. A questionnaire was handed out before the commencement of the study, and another at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average noise level was 86.68 dB without EPD and 86.83 dB with EPD. About 65.59% dentists considered the level of noise at their workplace to be medium level, and 98.92% did not wear EPD. Most common findings, such as irritability at the end of the day (77.42%), were relieved after use of EPD in 92.47% dentists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The noise in the paediatric department is above the NOISH-recommended exposure limit, which is harmful to the auditory system. In general, dentists are knowledgeable about the noise in the operatory, although their knowledge about EPDs is not high.</p>","PeriodicalId":19195,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Health","volume":"26 123","pages":"501-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_72_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Noise sources in paediatric dental offices include machinery and children's cries and screams. Although the presence of occupational noise-induced hearing loss (ONIHL) among dental operators is established, preventive measures such as ear protection devices (EPDs) are not frequently employed as prophylactic intervention. The primary aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the noise levels in paediatric dental clinics and to qualitatively evaluate the operators' perception of noise with and without the use of EPDs.

Methods: A crossover study was conducted with 93 operators; half of whom first worked without EPD, and the other half worked with EPD. Sound produced near each operator was recorded in decibels (dBs) for five working days, and the maximum sound in decibel for each day was noted and averaged. The results were then compared with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) exposure limits. A questionnaire was handed out before the commencement of the study, and another at the end of the study.

Results: The average noise level was 86.68 dB without EPD and 86.83 dB with EPD. About 65.59% dentists considered the level of noise at their workplace to be medium level, and 98.92% did not wear EPD. Most common findings, such as irritability at the end of the day (77.42%), were relieved after use of EPD in 92.47% dentists.

Conclusion: The noise in the paediatric department is above the NOISH-recommended exposure limit, which is harmful to the auditory system. In general, dentists are knowledgeable about the noise in the operatory, although their knowledge about EPDs is not high.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科牙科的噪音评估和使用耳保护装置后操作人员感知的变化。
背景:儿童牙科诊所的噪声源包括机械和儿童的哭声和尖叫声。虽然在牙科操作员中存在职业性噪音引起的听力损失(ONIHL),但预防措施,如耳朵保护装置(EPDs)并不经常被用作预防性干预措施。本研究的主要目的是定量评估儿科牙科诊所的噪音水平,并定性评估操作员在使用和不使用EPDs时对噪音的感知。方法:对93名操作者进行交叉研究;其中一半在没有环保署的情况下工作,另一半在有环保署的情况下工作。每个作业人员附近产生的声音以分贝(db)为单位记录了五个工作日,并记录了每天最大分贝的声音并取平均值。然后将结果与职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)和国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的暴露限值进行比较。一份调查问卷在研究开始前分发,另一份在研究结束时分发。结果:无EPD时平均噪声为86.68 dB,有EPD时平均噪声为86.83 dB。约65.59%的牙医认为其工作地点的噪音水平属中等水平,而98.92%的牙医则没有佩戴环境保护装置。92.47%的牙医在使用EPD后,最常见的症状(77.42%)得到缓解。结论:儿科噪声高于noish推荐暴露限值,对听觉系统有害。牙医虽然对环境污染物质的认识不高,但一般来说,他们对手术中的噪音是了解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Noise & Health
Noise & Health AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Noise and Health is the only International Journal devoted to research on all aspects of noise and its effects on human health. An inter-disciplinary journal for all professions concerned with auditory and non-auditory effects of occupational, environmental, and leisure noise. It aims to provide a forum for presentation of novel research material on a broad range of topics associated with noise pollution, its control and its detrimental effects on hearing and health. It will cover issues from basic experimental science through clinical evaluation and management, technical aspects of noise reduction systems and solutions to environmental issues relating to social and public health policy.
期刊最新文献
Effects of White Noise Intervention on Sleep Quality and Immunological Indicators of Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Evaluation of Noise in Paediatric Dentistry and Change in Perception of Operators with Use of Ear Protection Devices. Impact of Noise on Medical Anxiety in Hospitalized Children with Pneumonia: A Retrospective Study. Individual and combined effects of noise exposure and diabetes mellitus on hearing. Inflammatory Biomarkers and Tinnitus in Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1