Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03236-3
Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Alireza Alikhani, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ali Ansari, Raymund L Yong, Konstantinos Margetis
{"title":"Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Roozbeh Tavanaei, Mohammadhosein Akhlaghpasand, Alireza Alikhani, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Ali Ansari, Raymund L Yong, Konstantinos Margetis","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03236-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of meningiomas is determined based on the biopsy results. Therefore, accurate non-invasive preoperative grading could significantly improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Considering recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of these models in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. A systematic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 1, 2024, and reporting the performance metrics of the ML models in predicting of WHO meningioma grade using imaging studies. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed based on a number of potential influencing variables. A total of 32 studies with 15,365 patients were included in the present study. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of ML methods for prediction of tumor grade in meningioma were 85% (95% CI, 79-89%), 87% (95% CI, 81-91%), and 93% (95% CI, 90-95%), respectively. Both the type of validation and study cohort (training or test) were significantly associated with model performance. However, no significant association was found between the sample size or the type of ML method and model performance. The ML predictive models show a high overall performance in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. Further studies on the performance of DL algorithms in larger datasets using external validation are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03236-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) grade of meningiomas is determined based on the biopsy results. Therefore, accurate non-invasive preoperative grading could significantly improve treatment planning and patient outcomes. Considering recent advances in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of these models in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. A systematic search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published up to April 1, 2024, and reporting the performance metrics of the ML models in predicting of WHO meningioma grade using imaging studies. Pooled area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), specificity, and sensitivity were estimated. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed based on a number of potential influencing variables. A total of 32 studies with 15,365 patients were included in the present study. The overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of ML methods for prediction of tumor grade in meningioma were 85% (95% CI, 79-89%), 87% (95% CI, 81-91%), and 93% (95% CI, 90-95%), respectively. Both the type of validation and study cohort (training or test) were significantly associated with model performance. However, no significant association was found between the sample size or the type of ML method and model performance. The ML predictive models show a high overall performance in predicting the WHO meningioma grade using imaging data. Further studies on the performance of DL algorithms in larger datasets using external validation are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于放射组学的机器学习和基于深度学习的方法在脑膜瘤肿瘤分级预测中的表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目前,世界卫生组织(WHO)的脑膜瘤分级是根据活检结果确定的。因此,准确的无创术前分级可以显著改善治疗计划和患者预后。考虑到机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)的最新进展,本荟萃分析旨在评估这些模型在使用成像数据预测WHO脑膜瘤分级方面的性能。在PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane Library中进行了系统检索,检索截至2024年4月1日发表的研究,并报告了ML模型在使用影像学研究预测WHO脑膜瘤分级方面的性能指标。评估受试者工作特征曲线下的汇总面积(AUROC)、特异性和敏感性。根据一些潜在的影响变量进行亚组和元回归分析。本研究共纳入32项研究,15365例患者。ML方法预测脑膜瘤肿瘤分级的总体敏感性、特异性和AUROC分别为85% (95% CI, 79-89%)、87% (95% CI, 81-91%)和93% (95% CI, 90-95%)。验证类型和研究队列(训练或测试)都与模型性能显著相关。然而,在样本量或ML方法类型与模型性能之间没有发现显着关联。ML预测模型在使用成像数据预测WHO脑膜瘤分级方面显示出较高的整体性能。需要进一步研究使用外部验证的深度学习算法在更大数据集中的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: in search of the optimal approach-a meta-analysis comparing interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD). Endoscopic endonasal treatment of Meckel's cave epidermoid cysts: case series and systematic review. Endovascular treatment of basilar apex aneurysms: A bi-institutional case series and exploratory pulsatile computational fluid dynamic analysis. The beneficial effects of clazosentan on the perioperative management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Retraction Note: Proton beam therapy for skull base chordomas: a systematic review of tumor control rates and survival rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1