Endometrium-Free Closure Technique During Cesarean Delivery for Reducing the Risk of Niche Formation and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005813
Clarel Antoine, Jessica A Meyer, Jenna Silverstein, Julia Buldo-Licciardi, Chen Lyu, Ilan E Timor-Tritsch
{"title":"Endometrium-Free Closure Technique During Cesarean Delivery for Reducing the Risk of Niche Formation and Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders.","authors":"Clarel Antoine, Jessica A Meyer, Jenna Silverstein, Julia Buldo-Licciardi, Chen Lyu, Ilan E Timor-Tritsch","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the prevalence and severity of postcesarean residual niche, evaluated using saline infusion sonohysterography, in an expanded cohort of women with one prior cesarean delivery and to assess the effect of uterine closure technique on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis includes 70 patients who underwent saline infusion sonohysterography after one prior cesarean delivery. Patients were grouped according to hysterotomy closure technique: two-layer endometrium-free closure (technique A), and two- or one-layer routine closures (technique B). Niche dimensions and residual myometrial thickness were measured. The primary outcome was clinically significant niche (depth larger than 2 mm), a risk factor for PAS. Groups were compared using χ2, unpaired t test, Kruskal-Wallis, and logistic regression with significance at P<.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 33 patients in the technique A group and 37 patients in the technique B group. Technique A was associated with smaller niche dimensions (P=.018 for width, .005 for depth, and .002 for length), and exhibited thicker residual myometrial thickness (8.5 mm vs 5.5 mm, P=.041) and a lower incidence of clinically significant niches. The odds of having a clinically significant niche were 27 times higher in the technique B group (adjusted odds ratio 27.1, 95% CI, 4.35-168.81, P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Uterine closure techniques are associated with the development and size of postcesarean residual niches, which are critical risk factors for PAS disorders. Use of an endometrium-free closure technique during primary cesarean delivery is associated with a reduced risk of future niche formation and PAS complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the prevalence and severity of postcesarean residual niche, evaluated using saline infusion sonohysterography, in an expanded cohort of women with one prior cesarean delivery and to assess the effect of uterine closure technique on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.

Methods: This secondary analysis includes 70 patients who underwent saline infusion sonohysterography after one prior cesarean delivery. Patients were grouped according to hysterotomy closure technique: two-layer endometrium-free closure (technique A), and two- or one-layer routine closures (technique B). Niche dimensions and residual myometrial thickness were measured. The primary outcome was clinically significant niche (depth larger than 2 mm), a risk factor for PAS. Groups were compared using χ2, unpaired t test, Kruskal-Wallis, and logistic regression with significance at P<.05.

Results: There were 33 patients in the technique A group and 37 patients in the technique B group. Technique A was associated with smaller niche dimensions (P=.018 for width, .005 for depth, and .002 for length), and exhibited thicker residual myometrial thickness (8.5 mm vs 5.5 mm, P=.041) and a lower incidence of clinically significant niches. The odds of having a clinically significant niche were 27 times higher in the technique B group (adjusted odds ratio 27.1, 95% CI, 4.35-168.81, P<.001).

Conclusion: Uterine closure techniques are associated with the development and size of postcesarean residual niches, which are critical risk factors for PAS disorders. Use of an endometrium-free closure technique during primary cesarean delivery is associated with a reduced risk of future niche formation and PAS complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产中无子宫内膜闭合技术降低生态位形成和胎盘增生谱系障碍的风险。
目的:研究剖宫产后残留生态位的患病率和严重程度,应用生理盐水输注超声宫腔镜对有一次剖宫产史的妇女进行评估,并评估子宫关闭技术对胎盘增生谱(PAS)障碍风险的影响。方法:对70例剖宫产后接受生理盐水输注超声宫腔镜检查的患者进行二次分析。患者根据子宫切开闭合技术进行分组:两层无子宫内膜闭合(技术A)和两层或单层常规闭合(技术B)。测量小位尺寸和残余肌层厚度。主要结局是具有临床意义的生态位(深度大于2mm),这是PAS的一个危险因素。各组间比较采用χ2、非配对t检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、logistic回归分析,差异有统计学意义。结果:A组33例,B组37例。技术A与较小的生态位尺寸相关(P=。宽度为0.18,深度为0.005,长度为0.002),并且显示出更厚的残余肌层厚度(8.5 mm vs 5.5 mm, P= 0.041)和更低的临床意义龛发生率。技术B组出现具有临床意义的生态位的几率高出27倍(校正优势比27.1,95% CI, 4.35-168.81, p)。结论:子宫关闭技术与剖宫产后残留生态位的发育和大小有关,这是PAS疾病的关键危险因素。初次剖宫产时使用无子宫内膜闭合技术可降低未来小位形成和PAS并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
ACOG Publications: February 2025. New Editors Selected for Obstetrics & Gynecology. Obstetric Racial Disparities in the Era of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Correction. Clinical Validation of a Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Test for Fetal RHD in a Large U.S. Cohort. Online Screening and Virtual Patient Education for Hereditary Cancer Risk Assessment and Testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1