The utility of the Living Planet Index as a policy tool and for measuring nature recovery.

Louise McRae, Richard Cornford, Valentina Marconi, Hannah Puleston, Sophie E H Ledger, Stefanie Deinet, Philippa Oppenheimer, Mike Hoffmann, Robin Freeman
{"title":"The utility of the Living Planet Index as a policy tool and for measuring nature recovery.","authors":"Louise McRae, Richard Cornford, Valentina Marconi, Hannah Puleston, Sophie E H Ledger, Stefanie Deinet, Philippa Oppenheimer, Mike Hoffmann, Robin Freeman","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Living Planet Index (LPI) is a leading global biodiversity indicator based on vertebrate population time series. Since it was first developed over 25 years ago, the LPI has been widely used to indicate trends in biodiversity globally, primarily reported every two years in the Living Planet Report. Based on relative abundance, a sensitive metric of biodiversity change, the LPI has also been applied as a tool for informing policy and used in assessments for several multilateral conventions and agreements, including the Convention on Biological Diversity 2010 Biodiversity Target and Aichi targets. Here, we outline all current and some potential uses of the LPI as a policy tool and explore the use of the LPI in policy documents to assess the reach of the LPI geographically and over time. We present limitations to the use of this indicator in policy, primarily relating to the development of the index at the national level, and suggest clear pathways to broaden the utility of the LPI and the underlying database for temporal and spatial predictions of biodiversity change. We also provide evidence that the LPI can detect recoveries in biodiversity and suggest its suitability for measuring progress towards the goal of biodiversity recovery by 2050.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1917","pages":"20230207"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11712285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Living Planet Index (LPI) is a leading global biodiversity indicator based on vertebrate population time series. Since it was first developed over 25 years ago, the LPI has been widely used to indicate trends in biodiversity globally, primarily reported every two years in the Living Planet Report. Based on relative abundance, a sensitive metric of biodiversity change, the LPI has also been applied as a tool for informing policy and used in assessments for several multilateral conventions and agreements, including the Convention on Biological Diversity 2010 Biodiversity Target and Aichi targets. Here, we outline all current and some potential uses of the LPI as a policy tool and explore the use of the LPI in policy documents to assess the reach of the LPI geographically and over time. We present limitations to the use of this indicator in policy, primarily relating to the development of the index at the national level, and suggest clear pathways to broaden the utility of the LPI and the underlying database for temporal and spatial predictions of biodiversity change. We also provide evidence that the LPI can detect recoveries in biodiversity and suggest its suitability for measuring progress towards the goal of biodiversity recovery by 2050.This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Bending the curve towards nature recovery: building on Georgina Mace's legacy for a biodiverse future'.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球生命力指数作为政策工具和衡量自然恢复的效用。
地球生命指数(LPI)是基于脊椎动物种群时间序列的全球生物多样性指标。自25年前首次开发以来,LPI已被广泛用于表明全球生物多样性的趋势,主要是每两年在《地球生命力报告》中报告一次。基于相对丰度这一生物多样性变化的敏感指标,LPI还被用作政策信息的工具,并用于若干多边公约和协定的评估,包括《2010年生物多样性公约》的生物多样性目标和爱知目标。在这里,我们概述了LPI作为政策工具的所有当前和一些潜在用途,并探讨了LPI在政策文件中的使用,以评估LPI在地理上和时间上的影响范围。我们提出了在政策中使用该指标的局限性,主要与国家一级指数的发展有关,并提出了明确的途径,以扩大LPI和生物多样性变化时空预测基础数据库的效用。我们还提供了证据,表明LPI可以检测生物多样性的恢复,并建议其适合于衡量2050年生物多样性恢复目标的进展情况。这篇文章是讨论会议议题“弯曲自然恢复的曲线:以乔治娜梅斯的遗产为基础建设生物多样性的未来”的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
期刊最新文献
BioClocks UK: driving robust cycles of discovery to impact. Characterization of extracellular vesicles released from Prochlorococcus MED4 at the steady state and under a light-dark cycle. Chronic CRYPTOCHROME deficiency enhances cell-intrinsic antiviral defences. Circadian gating: concepts, processes, and opportunities. Circadian metabolic adaptations to infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1