Characteristics of Patients Experiencing Opioid Overdose and Eligibility for Prehospital Treatment with Buprenorphine.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Prehospital Emergency Care Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1080/10903127.2024.2445075
H Gene Hern, Vanessa Lara, Dre Cantwell-Frank, Sarah Abusaa, Allison D Rosen, Andrew A Herring
{"title":"Characteristics of Patients Experiencing Opioid Overdose and Eligibility for Prehospital Treatment with Buprenorphine.","authors":"H Gene Hern, Vanessa Lara, Dre Cantwell-Frank, Sarah Abusaa, Allison D Rosen, Andrew A Herring","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2445075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Opioids kill tens of thousands of patients each year. While only a fraction of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) have accessed treatment in the last year, 30% of people who died from an overdose had an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) encounter within a year of their death. Prehospital buprenorphine represents an important emerging OUD treatment, yet limited data describe barriers to this treatment. Our objectives were to quantify the number of patients encountered by EMS who were eligible for prehospital buprenorphine, and to examine characteristics of patients who did or did not receive treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed EMS patient records from Contra Costa County, CA, where paramedics were trained to identify patients experiencing opioid withdrawal and administer buprenorphine. Patient records were selected for review based on \"buprenorphine patient triggers,\" which were keywords within the charts that identified patients with potential overdose or symptoms that could indicate withdrawal or naloxone administration. We describe proportion of eligible patients and the characteristics of those who did and did not receive prehospital buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 1,159 records from September 2020 to July 2022. Of included patients, 984 (85%) were not eligible for buprenorphine. Nearly half (482, 49%,) of patients ineligible for buprenorphine fell into 2 primary categories: 331 (33%) had altered mental status (326 of 331 received naloxone), and 151 (15%) had no active withdrawal symptoms documented. Additional exclusions included other intoxicants, severe medical illness, or the patient denied having an OUD. Of those eligible for buprenorphine, 67 (38%) received buprenorphine. Of the 108 patients who did not receive buprenorphine, 69 (64%) had protocol deviation, 24 (22%) declined treatment, and 15 (14%) were in a non-enabled zone. Of all buprenorphine administrations, 19 (28%) were post-opioid overdose and 48 (72%) were for abstinence withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-in-three EMS patients with suspected opioid use disorder were ineligible for treatment with buprenorphine due to altered mental status. The second largest group consisted of patients who were eligible but not offered buprenorphine, highlighting potential gaps in paramedic training, logistical challenges in field administrations, and other factors that warrant further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2445075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Opioids kill tens of thousands of patients each year. While only a fraction of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) have accessed treatment in the last year, 30% of people who died from an overdose had an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) encounter within a year of their death. Prehospital buprenorphine represents an important emerging OUD treatment, yet limited data describe barriers to this treatment. Our objectives were to quantify the number of patients encountered by EMS who were eligible for prehospital buprenorphine, and to examine characteristics of patients who did or did not receive treatment.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed EMS patient records from Contra Costa County, CA, where paramedics were trained to identify patients experiencing opioid withdrawal and administer buprenorphine. Patient records were selected for review based on "buprenorphine patient triggers," which were keywords within the charts that identified patients with potential overdose or symptoms that could indicate withdrawal or naloxone administration. We describe proportion of eligible patients and the characteristics of those who did and did not receive prehospital buprenorphine.

Results: We reviewed 1,159 records from September 2020 to July 2022. Of included patients, 984 (85%) were not eligible for buprenorphine. Nearly half (482, 49%,) of patients ineligible for buprenorphine fell into 2 primary categories: 331 (33%) had altered mental status (326 of 331 received naloxone), and 151 (15%) had no active withdrawal symptoms documented. Additional exclusions included other intoxicants, severe medical illness, or the patient denied having an OUD. Of those eligible for buprenorphine, 67 (38%) received buprenorphine. Of the 108 patients who did not receive buprenorphine, 69 (64%) had protocol deviation, 24 (22%) declined treatment, and 15 (14%) were in a non-enabled zone. Of all buprenorphine administrations, 19 (28%) were post-opioid overdose and 48 (72%) were for abstinence withdrawal.

Conclusions: One-in-three EMS patients with suspected opioid use disorder were ineligible for treatment with buprenorphine due to altered mental status. The second largest group consisted of patients who were eligible but not offered buprenorphine, highlighting potential gaps in paramedic training, logistical challenges in field administrations, and other factors that warrant further exploration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物过量患者的特点和丁丙诺啡院前治疗的资格。
目的:阿片类药物每年导致数万名患者死亡。虽然去年只有一小部分阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者获得了治疗,但30%因过量服用阿片类药物而死亡的人在死亡后一年内接受了紧急医疗服务(EMS)。院前丁丙诺啡是一种重要的新兴OUD治疗方法,但有限的数据描述了这种治疗的障碍。我们的目的是量化EMS遇到的符合院前丁丙诺啡治疗条件的患者数量,并检查接受或未接受治疗的患者的特征。方法:在这项回顾性观察性研究中,我们分析了来自加利福尼亚州康特拉科斯塔县的EMS患者记录,那里的护理人员接受了培训,以识别出现阿片类药物戒断的患者并给予丁丙诺啡。根据“丁丙诺啡患者触发因素”选择患者记录进行审查,这是图表中的关键字,用于识别可能过量服用的患者或可能表明停药或纳洛酮治疗的症状。我们描述了符合条件的患者的比例以及院前接受和未接受丁丙诺啡的患者的特征。结果:我们回顾了2020年9月至2022年7月期间的1159份记录。在纳入的患者中,984例(85%)不符合丁丙诺啡的使用条件。将近一半(482,49%)不适合丁丙诺啡的患者分为两个主要类别:331(33%)有精神状态改变(331人中有326人接受纳洛酮治疗),151(15%)没有记录的主动戒断症状。其他排除包括其他麻醉剂、严重内科疾病或患者否认有OUD。在符合丁丙诺啡治疗条件的患者中,67例(38%)接受了丁丙诺啡治疗。在108名未接受丁丙诺啡的患者中,69名(64%)患者有方案偏差,24名(22%)患者拒绝治疗,15名(14%)患者处于非启用区。在所有丁丙诺啡用药中,19例(28%)为阿片类药物过量,48例(72%)为戒断。结论:三分之一的疑似阿片类药物使用障碍EMS患者由于精神状态改变而不适合丁丙诺啡治疗。第二大组包括符合条件但未提供丁丙诺啡的患者,突出了护理人员培训方面的潜在差距,现场管理中的后勤挑战以及其他值得进一步探索的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Social Determinants of Health and Emergency Medical Services: A Scoping Review. Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model. Paramedic-administered fibrinolysis in older patients with prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions: The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency. Non-Invasive Ventilation as a Pre-Oxygenation Strategy During In-Flight Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1