Priority Setting Partnership on Placental Pathology: Consensus recommendations for placental research

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Placenta Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.020
Mauritia C. Marijnen , M.I. Bügel , T. Yee Khong , Neil J. Sebire , Alexander E.P. Heazell , Wessel Ganzevoort , Frank H. Bloomfield , Elisabeth M.W. Kooi , Lotte-Elisabeth van der Meeren , Sanne J. Gordijn
{"title":"Priority Setting Partnership on Placental Pathology: Consensus recommendations for placental research","authors":"Mauritia C. Marijnen ,&nbsp;M.I. Bügel ,&nbsp;T. Yee Khong ,&nbsp;Neil J. Sebire ,&nbsp;Alexander E.P. Heazell ,&nbsp;Wessel Ganzevoort ,&nbsp;Frank H. Bloomfield ,&nbsp;Elisabeth M.W. Kooi ,&nbsp;Lotte-Elisabeth van der Meeren ,&nbsp;Sanne J. Gordijn","doi":"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The placenta supports the metabolic and respiratory requirements of the fetus. Placental disorders, caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms, may result in adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Knowledge gaps remain in the understanding, reporting and interpretation of placental pathology relating to clinical conditions. This project aimed to collaboratively identify the most important unanswered research questions related to placental pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An international Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was conducted, involving (perinatal) pathologists, obstetricians, paediatrician-neonatologists, midwives, and scientists with expertise in placental pathology. In the first survey, participants identified their three most important unanswered research questions. Afterwards literature was reviewed for evidence on the proposed questions. In a second survey, participants ranked the most important questions from an initial long-list. The top-ranked questions were then discussed and finalized in a 1-h online consensus workshop.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety participants completed the first survey. The majority of stakeholders were perinatal pathologists (n = 39 (43.3 %) and most were based in Europe (n = 43 (47.8 %). 270 questions were submitted; after review, these were subdivided into 32 overarching questions. The second ranking survey was completed by 53 participants. Twenty-five participants attended the online workshop, which reached consensus on the top 10. The questions focus, among others, on causes, recurrence risk, consistency of reporting, diagnosing tools and potential use of artificial intelligence.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Following this international PSP, the top 10 prioritized research questions on placental pathology have been identified. This will inform the research agenda for funders and policy-makers, and is intended to improve care for patients suffering from placental insufficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20203,"journal":{"name":"Placenta","volume":"160 ","pages":"Pages 67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Placenta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400424008117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The placenta supports the metabolic and respiratory requirements of the fetus. Placental disorders, caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms, may result in adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Knowledge gaps remain in the understanding, reporting and interpretation of placental pathology relating to clinical conditions. This project aimed to collaboratively identify the most important unanswered research questions related to placental pathology.

Methods

An international Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was conducted, involving (perinatal) pathologists, obstetricians, paediatrician-neonatologists, midwives, and scientists with expertise in placental pathology. In the first survey, participants identified their three most important unanswered research questions. Afterwards literature was reviewed for evidence on the proposed questions. In a second survey, participants ranked the most important questions from an initial long-list. The top-ranked questions were then discussed and finalized in a 1-h online consensus workshop.

Results

Ninety participants completed the first survey. The majority of stakeholders were perinatal pathologists (n = 39 (43.3 %) and most were based in Europe (n = 43 (47.8 %). 270 questions were submitted; after review, these were subdivided into 32 overarching questions. The second ranking survey was completed by 53 participants. Twenty-five participants attended the online workshop, which reached consensus on the top 10. The questions focus, among others, on causes, recurrence risk, consistency of reporting, diagnosing tools and potential use of artificial intelligence.

Discussion

Following this international PSP, the top 10 prioritized research questions on placental pathology have been identified. This will inform the research agenda for funders and policy-makers, and is intended to improve care for patients suffering from placental insufficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优先设置伙伴关系在胎盘病理学:共识建议胎盘研究。
胎盘支持胎儿的代谢和呼吸需求。由各种病理生理机制引起的胎盘疾病可能导致不良的妊娠和新生儿结局。知识差距仍然存在的理解,报告和解释胎盘病理相关的临床条件。该项目旨在共同确定与胎盘病理学相关的最重要的未解研究问题。方法:开展了一项国际重点确定伙伴关系(PSP),涉及(围产期)病理学家、产科医生、儿科-新生儿医生、助产士和胎盘病理学专家。在第一次调查中,参与者确定了他们最重要的三个未回答的研究问题。随后,对文献进行了回顾,以寻找有关所提问题的证据。在第二项调查中,参与者从最初的一长串问题中选出最重要的问题。然后在1小时的在线共识研讨会上讨论并最终确定排名靠前的问题。结果:90名参与者完成了第一次调查。大多数利益相关者是围产期病理学家(n = 39(43.3%)),大多数来自欧洲(n = 43(47.8%))。共提交问题270个;经过审查,这些问题被细分为32个总体问题。第二项排名调查由53名参与者完成。25名参与者参加了在线研讨会,并就前10名达成了共识。这些问题主要集中在原因、复发风险、报告的一致性、诊断工具和人工智能的潜在应用等方面。讨论:在本次国际PSP之后,确定了胎盘病理学的十大优先研究问题。这将为资助者和决策者的研究议程提供信息,并旨在改善对胎盘功能不全患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Placenta
Placenta 医学-发育生物学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Placenta publishes high-quality original articles and invited topical reviews on all aspects of human and animal placentation, and the interactions between the mother, the placenta and fetal development. Topics covered include evolution, development, genetics and epigenetics, stem cells, metabolism, transport, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental programming. The Editors welcome studies on implantation and the endometrium, comparative placentation, the uterine and umbilical circulations, the relationship between fetal and placental development, clinical aspects of altered placental development or function, the placental membranes, the influence of paternal factors on placental development or function, and the assessment of biomarkers of placental disorders.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Placental lesions induced by Omicron SARS-CoV-2 in a pregnant woman treated with anti-CD20 Corrigendum to “Placental size at gestational week 27 and 37: The associations with pulsatility index in the uterine and the fetal-placental arteries” [Placenta 145C (2024) 45-50] Down-regulation of MYO1A inhibits trophoblast cell proliferation and migration through SMURF2/Hedgehog signaling pathway and leads to fetal growth restriction A locus control region generates distinct active placental lactogen and inactive growth hormone gene domains in term placenta that are disrupted with obesity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1