Mauritia C. Marijnen , M.I. Bügel , T. Yee Khong , Neil J. Sebire , Alexander E.P. Heazell , Wessel Ganzevoort , Frank H. Bloomfield , Elisabeth M.W. Kooi , Lotte-Elisabeth van der Meeren , Sanne J. Gordijn
{"title":"Priority Setting Partnership on Placental Pathology: Consensus recommendations for placental research","authors":"Mauritia C. Marijnen , M.I. Bügel , T. Yee Khong , Neil J. Sebire , Alexander E.P. Heazell , Wessel Ganzevoort , Frank H. Bloomfield , Elisabeth M.W. Kooi , Lotte-Elisabeth van der Meeren , Sanne J. Gordijn","doi":"10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The placenta supports the metabolic and respiratory requirements of the fetus. Placental disorders, caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms, may result in adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Knowledge gaps remain in the understanding, reporting and interpretation of placental pathology relating to clinical conditions. This project aimed to collaboratively identify the most important unanswered research questions related to placental pathology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An international Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was conducted, involving (perinatal) pathologists, obstetricians, paediatrician-neonatologists, midwives, and scientists with expertise in placental pathology. In the first survey, participants identified their three most important unanswered research questions. Afterwards literature was reviewed for evidence on the proposed questions. In a second survey, participants ranked the most important questions from an initial long-list. The top-ranked questions were then discussed and finalized in a 1-h online consensus workshop.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety participants completed the first survey. The majority of stakeholders were perinatal pathologists (n = 39 (43.3 %) and most were based in Europe (n = 43 (47.8 %). 270 questions were submitted; after review, these were subdivided into 32 overarching questions. The second ranking survey was completed by 53 participants. Twenty-five participants attended the online workshop, which reached consensus on the top 10. The questions focus, among others, on causes, recurrence risk, consistency of reporting, diagnosing tools and potential use of artificial intelligence.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Following this international PSP, the top 10 prioritized research questions on placental pathology have been identified. This will inform the research agenda for funders and policy-makers, and is intended to improve care for patients suffering from placental insufficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20203,"journal":{"name":"Placenta","volume":"160 ","pages":"Pages 67-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Placenta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400424008117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The placenta supports the metabolic and respiratory requirements of the fetus. Placental disorders, caused by various pathophysiological mechanisms, may result in adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Knowledge gaps remain in the understanding, reporting and interpretation of placental pathology relating to clinical conditions. This project aimed to collaboratively identify the most important unanswered research questions related to placental pathology.
Methods
An international Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) was conducted, involving (perinatal) pathologists, obstetricians, paediatrician-neonatologists, midwives, and scientists with expertise in placental pathology. In the first survey, participants identified their three most important unanswered research questions. Afterwards literature was reviewed for evidence on the proposed questions. In a second survey, participants ranked the most important questions from an initial long-list. The top-ranked questions were then discussed and finalized in a 1-h online consensus workshop.
Results
Ninety participants completed the first survey. The majority of stakeholders were perinatal pathologists (n = 39 (43.3 %) and most were based in Europe (n = 43 (47.8 %). 270 questions were submitted; after review, these were subdivided into 32 overarching questions. The second ranking survey was completed by 53 participants. Twenty-five participants attended the online workshop, which reached consensus on the top 10. The questions focus, among others, on causes, recurrence risk, consistency of reporting, diagnosing tools and potential use of artificial intelligence.
Discussion
Following this international PSP, the top 10 prioritized research questions on placental pathology have been identified. This will inform the research agenda for funders and policy-makers, and is intended to improve care for patients suffering from placental insufficiency.
期刊介绍:
Placenta publishes high-quality original articles and invited topical reviews on all aspects of human and animal placentation, and the interactions between the mother, the placenta and fetal development. Topics covered include evolution, development, genetics and epigenetics, stem cells, metabolism, transport, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, cell and molecular biology, and developmental programming. The Editors welcome studies on implantation and the endometrium, comparative placentation, the uterine and umbilical circulations, the relationship between fetal and placental development, clinical aspects of altered placental development or function, the placental membranes, the influence of paternal factors on placental development or function, and the assessment of biomarkers of placental disorders.