Effect of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures to prevent anastomotic leakage: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Saudi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240422
Feng-Bing Wang, Min-Min Song, Nian-Wen Zhang, Wei-Feng, Bin-Liu, Peng-Fei Zhang
{"title":"Effect of laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcing sutures to prevent anastomotic leakage: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Feng-Bing Wang, Min-Min Song, Nian-Wen Zhang, Wei-Feng, Bin-Liu, Peng-Fei Zhang","doi":"10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of reinforcing sutures after surgery for rectal cancer and its associated impact on postoperative recovery. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication after anteriorrectal resection. It is currently unclear whether laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcingsutures can effectively reduce the incidence of AL.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From inception to 2024, the literature search was conducted using a variety of databases, including PubMed, the Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), Wanfang, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), to identify relevant articles. Free-text forms were used to search the literature: \"rectal cancer\", \"rectal neoplasms\", \"reinforcing sutures\", and \"anastomotic leakage\" or AL. The search was undertaken by 2 different reviewers, who independently evaluated the studies.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Twelve retrospective studies and 4 RCTs were analyzed in all. A total of 3147 individuals were identified, with 1512 receiving reinforcing sutures and 1635 not. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery to get reinforcing sutures had a notably decreased occurrence of anastomotic leakage, according to our data. (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.21-0.51, <i>p</i><0.00001). It had an earlier anal exhaust time and a shorter hospitalization. The 2 different groups did not differ substantially with regard to intraoperative blood loss or the rate of postoperative intestinal obstruction. However, patients who received reinforced sutures via a laparoscopic approach cost more operative time (MD=16.77, 95% CI 11.31-22.23, <i>p</i><0.00001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The occurrence of AL can be greatly decreased through the use of a laparoscopic approach for anastomotic reinforcement, which may be a better option after radical surgery for rectal patients. However, more RCT studies with large sample sizes are needed.<b>PROSPERO:</b> CRD42024548847.</p>","PeriodicalId":21453,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Medical Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of reinforcing sutures after surgery for rectal cancer and its associated impact on postoperative recovery. Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a common and serious complication after anteriorrectal resection. It is currently unclear whether laparoscopic intracorporeal reinforcingsutures can effectively reduce the incidence of AL.

Method: From inception to 2024, the literature search was conducted using a variety of databases, including PubMed, the Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), Wanfang, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, VIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), to identify relevant articles. Free-text forms were used to search the literature: "rectal cancer", "rectal neoplasms", "reinforcing sutures", and "anastomotic leakage" or AL. The search was undertaken by 2 different reviewers, who independently evaluated the studies.

Result: Twelve retrospective studies and 4 RCTs were analyzed in all. A total of 3147 individuals were identified, with 1512 receiving reinforcing sutures and 1635 not. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery to get reinforcing sutures had a notably decreased occurrence of anastomotic leakage, according to our data. (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.21-0.51, p<0.00001). It had an earlier anal exhaust time and a shorter hospitalization. The 2 different groups did not differ substantially with regard to intraoperative blood loss or the rate of postoperative intestinal obstruction. However, patients who received reinforced sutures via a laparoscopic approach cost more operative time (MD=16.77, 95% CI 11.31-22.23, p<0.00001).

Conclusion: The occurrence of AL can be greatly decreased through the use of a laparoscopic approach for anastomotic reinforcement, which may be a better option after radical surgery for rectal patients. However, more RCT studies with large sample sizes are needed.PROSPERO: CRD42024548847.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜体内加固缝合线预防吻合口漏的效果:一项荟萃分析。
目的:评价直肠癌术后加强缝合的效果及其对术后恢复的影响。吻合口漏是肛肠切除术后常见而严重的并发症。方法:从成立到2024年,通过PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、VIP、中国知网(CNKI)等多种数据库进行文献检索,检索相关文章。使用自由文本形式检索文献:“直肠癌”、“直肠肿瘤”、“加固缝线”和“吻合口漏”或AL。检索由2名不同的审稿人进行,他们独立评估研究。结果:共分析了12项回顾性研究和4项随机对照试验。共鉴定出3147只,其中1512只接受加固缝合,1635只未接受加固缝合。根据我们的数据,接受腹腔镜手术进行强化缝合的患者明显减少了吻合口漏的发生。(或0.33;结论:腹腔镜下吻合口加固入路可大大减少AL的发生,是直肠癌根治性手术后较好的选择。然而,需要更多大样本量的RCT研究。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42024548847。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Medical Journal
Saudi Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
203
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Saudi Medical Journal is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal. It is an open access journal, with content released under a Creative Commons attribution-noncommercial license. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, Systematic Reviews, Case Reports, Brief Communication, Brief Report, Clinical Note, Clinical Image, Editorials, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Student Corner.
期刊最新文献
Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography and Neonatal Hemodynamics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A One-Year Experience in Service Implementation. Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Regulation to Alleviate Sickle Cell Disease Severity: A Promising Therapeutic Approach. Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Among Stroke Patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study (2024) Detailing Dual Center Experience. Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia: Current Challenges and Future Directions. From Text to Test: Pre-Lecture Reading Boosts Medical Students' Comprehension and Retention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1