Experiences of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer participating in a supervised exercise intervention during chemotherapy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09101-1
Calvin G Brouwer, Marieke R Ten Tusscher, Bente M de Roos, Elske C Gootjes, Tineke E Buffart, Kathelijn S Versteeg, Isa H Mast, Mirte M Streppel, Inge M Werter, Anne M May, Henk M W Verheul, Laurien M Buffart
{"title":"Experiences of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer participating in a supervised exercise intervention during chemotherapy.","authors":"Calvin G Brouwer, Marieke R Ten Tusscher, Bente M de Roos, Elske C Gootjes, Tineke E Buffart, Kathelijn S Versteeg, Isa H Mast, Mirte M Streppel, Inge M Werter, Anne M May, Henk M W Verheul, Laurien M Buffart","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09101-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing systemic treatment often experience toxicities. Although exercise may improve physical fitness and quality of life and counteract treatment toxicity, knowledge in patients with mCRC is limited. The ongoing randomized controlled AMICO trial evaluates the effects of supervised exercise on clinical outcomes. The present qualitative study was a pre-planned part of this trial aiming to capture adherence, satisfaction, and perceived effects of exercise among patients with mCRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mCRC receiving first-line systemic treatment were randomized (1:1:1) to a control group or one of two supervised exercise arms including continuous aerobic exercise with either resistance exercises or high-intensity interval training. Semi-structured interviews with patients in the exercise arms were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Descriptive data on adherence (exercise logs) and satisfaction (questionnaire) was collected to complement and contextualize the qualitative findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one patients were interviewed. Median exercise attendance was 67% [IQR 35-91], and the median satisfaction score was 8 [IQR 8-9] out of 10. Patients valued the guidance and knowledge of the physical therapist and expressed interindividual preferences regarding training content. Patients experienced that exercise improved their physical and mental wellbeing and helped them to endure treatment. Perceived exercise barriers were treatment toxicity, physical problems, and hospital appointments. Perceived exercise facilitators included adequate tailoring and internal or external motivation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with mCRC appreciated exercise during systemic treatment and perceived several beneficial effects, both physically and mentally. Exercise attendance varied and barriers were mainly treatment- and disease-related.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Gov id: </strong>NCT04754672. Date of registration: 04-12-2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09101-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) undergoing systemic treatment often experience toxicities. Although exercise may improve physical fitness and quality of life and counteract treatment toxicity, knowledge in patients with mCRC is limited. The ongoing randomized controlled AMICO trial evaluates the effects of supervised exercise on clinical outcomes. The present qualitative study was a pre-planned part of this trial aiming to capture adherence, satisfaction, and perceived effects of exercise among patients with mCRC.

Methods: Patients with mCRC receiving first-line systemic treatment were randomized (1:1:1) to a control group or one of two supervised exercise arms including continuous aerobic exercise with either resistance exercises or high-intensity interval training. Semi-structured interviews with patients in the exercise arms were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Descriptive data on adherence (exercise logs) and satisfaction (questionnaire) was collected to complement and contextualize the qualitative findings.

Results: Twenty-one patients were interviewed. Median exercise attendance was 67% [IQR 35-91], and the median satisfaction score was 8 [IQR 8-9] out of 10. Patients valued the guidance and knowledge of the physical therapist and expressed interindividual preferences regarding training content. Patients experienced that exercise improved their physical and mental wellbeing and helped them to endure treatment. Perceived exercise barriers were treatment toxicity, physical problems, and hospital appointments. Perceived exercise facilitators included adequate tailoring and internal or external motivation.

Conclusion: Patients with mCRC appreciated exercise during systemic treatment and perceived several beneficial effects, both physically and mentally. Exercise attendance varied and barriers were mainly treatment- and disease-related.

Trial registration: Clinical trial.

Gov id: NCT04754672. Date of registration: 04-12-2020.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性结直肠癌患者在化疗期间参与监督运动干预的经验。
目的:接受全身治疗的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者经常会出现毒性反应。虽然运动可以改善身体素质和生活质量,并抵消治疗毒性,但对mCRC患者的认识有限。正在进行的随机对照AMICO试验评估监督运动对临床结果的影响。目前的定性研究是该试验的一个预先计划的部分,旨在捕捉mCRC患者的运动依从性、满意度和感知效果。方法:接受一线全身治疗的mCRC患者随机(1:1:1)分为对照组或两个监督运动组之一,包括持续有氧运动与阻力运动或高强度间歇训练。对运动组患者的半结构化访谈逐字记录并进行主题分析。收集了关于坚持(运动日志)和满意度(问卷)的描述性数据,以补充和背景化定性研究结果。结果:共访谈21例患者。运动出勤率中位数为67% [IQR 35-91],满意度中位数为8 [IQR 8-9](满分10分)。患者重视物理治疗师的指导和知识,并对培训内容表达了个体间的偏好。患者认为,运动改善了他们的身心健康,并帮助他们忍受治疗。感知到的运动障碍包括治疗毒性、身体问题和医院预约。感知到的运动促进因素包括适当的剪裁和内部或外部动机。结论:mCRC患者在全身治疗过程中重视运动,并感受到身体和精神上的一些有益效果。运动出勤率各不相同,障碍主要与治疗和疾病有关。试验注册:临床试验。政府信息:NCT04754672。报名日期:2020年4月12日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1