Efficacy and Renal Safety of Protocol-based 11.7% Hypertonic Saline Infusion Compared with 20% Mannitol in Patients with Elevated Intracranial Pressure: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Q3 Medicine Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.5049/EBP.2024.22.2.33
Sunggyul Lim, Yongjin Yi
{"title":"Efficacy and Renal Safety of Protocol-based 11.7% Hypertonic Saline Infusion Compared with 20% Mannitol in Patients with Elevated Intracranial Pressure: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sunggyul Lim, Yongjin Yi","doi":"10.5049/EBP.2024.22.2.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt intervention. While both mannitol and hypertonic saline (HTS) are commonly used hyperosmotic agents for treating elevated ICP, there is insufficient evidence comparing their renal safety profiles and overall effectiveness. This study protocol outlines a pragmatic randomized trial to compare protocol-based 11.7% HTS with 20% mannitol in patients with elevated ICP, focusing particularly on renal outcomes and treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, pragmatic randomized trial will enroll 116 intensive care unit patients with elevated ICP. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 11.7% HTS or 20% mannitol following a schedule-based randomization approach, with HTS administration during odd-numbered months and mannitol during even-numbered months. The study will regularly monitor serum electrolytes, osmolarity, and renal function, with brain CT evaluations conducted on days 3 and 7. Comprehensive clinical assessments, including neurological evaluations and laboratory tests, will be performed at specified intervals throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Measured outcomes: </strong>Primary outcomes include the incidence of acute kidney injury within 7 days according to KDIGO guidelines, requirement for mechanical ventilation, development of pulmonary edema, and significant fluid retention. Secondary outcomes encompass ICU and hospital length of stay, 30- and 90-day mortality rates, and neurological outcomes assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale scores at days 7 and 30. The study hypothesizes that protocol-based HTS administration will demonstrate a lower incidence of acute kidney injury and related complications while maintaining comparable efficacy in managing elevated ICP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study aims to provide definitive evidence regarding the relative efficacy and safety profiles of HTS compared to mannitol in managing elevated ICP. The findings will help establish clearer clinical guidelines for selecting appropriate hyperosmotic agents, potentially improving patient care outcomes and reducing treatment-related complications. This research will address a significant gap in current clinical knowledge and practice by focusing on treatment efficacy and renal safety considerations in patients with elevated ICP.</p>","PeriodicalId":35352,"journal":{"name":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","volume":"22 2","pages":"33-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrolyte and Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5049/EBP.2024.22.2.33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring prompt intervention. While both mannitol and hypertonic saline (HTS) are commonly used hyperosmotic agents for treating elevated ICP, there is insufficient evidence comparing their renal safety profiles and overall effectiveness. This study protocol outlines a pragmatic randomized trial to compare protocol-based 11.7% HTS with 20% mannitol in patients with elevated ICP, focusing particularly on renal outcomes and treatment efficacy.

Methods: This single-center, pragmatic randomized trial will enroll 116 intensive care unit patients with elevated ICP. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 11.7% HTS or 20% mannitol following a schedule-based randomization approach, with HTS administration during odd-numbered months and mannitol during even-numbered months. The study will regularly monitor serum electrolytes, osmolarity, and renal function, with brain CT evaluations conducted on days 3 and 7. Comprehensive clinical assessments, including neurological evaluations and laboratory tests, will be performed at specified intervals throughout the study period.

Measured outcomes: Primary outcomes include the incidence of acute kidney injury within 7 days according to KDIGO guidelines, requirement for mechanical ventilation, development of pulmonary edema, and significant fluid retention. Secondary outcomes encompass ICU and hospital length of stay, 30- and 90-day mortality rates, and neurological outcomes assessed by Glasgow Coma Scale scores at days 7 and 30. The study hypothesizes that protocol-based HTS administration will demonstrate a lower incidence of acute kidney injury and related complications while maintaining comparable efficacy in managing elevated ICP.

Conclusion: This study aims to provide definitive evidence regarding the relative efficacy and safety profiles of HTS compared to mannitol in managing elevated ICP. The findings will help establish clearer clinical guidelines for selecting appropriate hyperosmotic agents, potentially improving patient care outcomes and reducing treatment-related complications. This research will address a significant gap in current clinical knowledge and practice by focusing on treatment efficacy and renal safety considerations in patients with elevated ICP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于方案的11.7%高渗盐水输注与20%甘露醇输注在颅内压升高患者中的疗效和肾脏安全性:一项随机临床试验的研究方案。
背景:颅内压升高是一种潜在的危及生命的疾病,需要及时干预。虽然甘露醇和高渗盐水(HTS)都是治疗ICP升高的常用高渗药物,但比较其肾脏安全性和总体有效性的证据不足。本研究方案概述了一项实用的随机试验,以比较方案为基础的11.7% HTS和20%甘露醇对ICP升高患者的治疗效果,特别关注肾脏预后和治疗效果。方法:这项单中心、实用的随机试验将招募116例ICP升高的重症监护病房患者。参与者将被随机分配接受11.7% HTS或20%甘露醇治疗,其中HTS治疗在奇数个月,甘露醇治疗在偶数个月。该研究将定期监测血清电解质、渗透压和肾功能,并在第3天和第7天进行脑CT评估。在整个研究期间,将在指定的时间间隔进行全面的临床评估,包括神经系统评估和实验室测试。测量结果:根据KDIGO指南,主要结果包括7天内急性肾损伤的发生率、机械通气的需求、肺水肿的发展和明显的液体潴留。次要结局包括ICU和住院时间、30天和90天死亡率,以及第7天和30天格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分评估的神经系统结局。该研究假设,基于方案的HTS给药将证明急性肾损伤和相关并发症的发生率较低,同时在处理升高的ICP方面保持相当的疗效。结论:本研究旨在提供关于HTS相对于甘露醇治疗ICP升高的有效性和安全性的明确证据。研究结果将有助于建立更清晰的临床指南,选择合适的高渗药物,潜在地改善患者的护理结果,减少治疗相关的并发症。本研究将通过关注ICP升高患者的治疗效果和肾脏安全考虑,解决当前临床知识和实践中的重大空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure
Electrolyte and Blood Pressure Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Era in Diabetic Kidney Disease Treatment: The Four Pillars and Strategies to Build Beyond. Efficacy and Renal Safety of Protocol-based 11.7% Hypertonic Saline Infusion Compared with 20% Mannitol in Patients with Elevated Intracranial Pressure: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. Management Strategies for Potassium Levels During Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. A Case of Recurrent Renal Infarction Following Transient Resolution: Evidence From Serial Computed Tomography. Is Renal Denervation Effective in Treating Resistant Hypertension?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1