Facilitators and Barriers for Physiotherapists to Engage in Goal-Setting With Patients During Their Hospital Stay-An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pri.70024
Linda Baumbach, Wiebke Feddern, Friederike Grube, Hans-Helmut König, André Hajek, Susanne G R Klotz
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers for Physiotherapists to Engage in Goal-Setting With Patients During Their Hospital Stay-An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Linda Baumbach, Wiebke Feddern, Friederike Grube, Hans-Helmut König, André Hajek, Susanne G R Klotz","doi":"10.1002/pri.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Goal setting is a key aspect of patient-centered physiotherapy, helping to motivate patients, align healthcare efforts, prevent oversight, and stop ineffective interventions. This study aims to identify facilitators and barriers for physiotherapists in hospitals to set and document patient treatment goals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. The survey, informed by systematic reviews of factors influencing shared decision-making and the theoretical domains framework (TDF), included 25 statements to be rated. Two focus groups (n = 8) discussed (1) factors from the survey, (2) the goal-setting processes, and (3) brainstormed facilitators and barriers for documenting physiotherapy goals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey findings showed mixed opinions but agreement on two factors, which indicate that the goal influences the therapeutic interventions and motivates the therapists. The focus group identified four themes: \"Goal,\" \"Physiotherapeutic Self-Conception,\" \"Interprofessionality\", and \"Hospital Setting.\" Issues included limited space and poor placement in documentation systems, mental rather than written goal conceptualization, and a perceived lack of interest from interprofessional team members, leading to deprioritization by physiotherapists. Finally, joint goal setting was deemed impractical for certain patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Hospital physiotherapists set treatment goals with their patients. The process is influenced by various factors, including interprofessional dynamics and the hospital setting. The identified themes align with existing literature. Effective documentation of patient-centered physiotherapy goals in hospitals requires well-designed tools and interprofessional collaboration. Further, it is crucial to understand professional self-conception and acknowledge situations where physiotherapists need to set goals independently.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70024"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Goal setting is a key aspect of patient-centered physiotherapy, helping to motivate patients, align healthcare efforts, prevent oversight, and stop ineffective interventions. This study aims to identify facilitators and barriers for physiotherapists in hospitals to set and document patient treatment goals.

Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods approach was used. The survey, informed by systematic reviews of factors influencing shared decision-making and the theoretical domains framework (TDF), included 25 statements to be rated. Two focus groups (n = 8) discussed (1) factors from the survey, (2) the goal-setting processes, and (3) brainstormed facilitators and barriers for documenting physiotherapy goals.

Results: Survey findings showed mixed opinions but agreement on two factors, which indicate that the goal influences the therapeutic interventions and motivates the therapists. The focus group identified four themes: "Goal," "Physiotherapeutic Self-Conception," "Interprofessionality", and "Hospital Setting." Issues included limited space and poor placement in documentation systems, mental rather than written goal conceptualization, and a perceived lack of interest from interprofessional team members, leading to deprioritization by physiotherapists. Finally, joint goal setting was deemed impractical for certain patients.

Discussion: Hospital physiotherapists set treatment goals with their patients. The process is influenced by various factors, including interprofessional dynamics and the hospital setting. The identified themes align with existing literature. Effective documentation of patient-centered physiotherapy goals in hospitals requires well-designed tools and interprofessional collaboration. Further, it is crucial to understand professional self-conception and acknowledge situations where physiotherapists need to set goals independently.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物理治疗师在患者住院期间参与目标设定的促进因素和障碍——一项解释性顺序混合方法研究。
背景和目的:目标设定是以患者为中心的物理治疗的一个关键方面,有助于激励患者,协调医疗保健工作,防止疏忽,并停止无效的干预。本研究旨在找出医院物理治疗师设定及记录病人治疗目标的便利因素及障碍。方法:采用解释性顺序混合方法。这项调查是通过对影响共同决策的因素和理论领域框架(TDF)的系统审查得出的,包括25项有待评级的陈述。两个焦点小组(n = 8)讨论了(1)调查中的因素,(2)目标设定过程,(3)对记录物理治疗目标的促进因素和障碍进行了头脑风暴。结果:调查结果在两个因素上意见不一,但一致,这表明目标影响治疗干预并激励治疗师。焦点小组确定了四个主题:“目标”、“物理治疗自我概念”、“跨专业”和“医院环境”。问题包括有限的空间和文件系统中的不良位置,心理而不是书面的目标概念化,以及来自跨专业团队成员的缺乏兴趣,导致物理治疗师的优先级降低。最后,对于某些患者,联合目标设定被认为是不切实际的。讨论:医院物理治疗师与患者一起设定治疗目标。这一过程受到各种因素的影响,包括专业间动态和医院环境。确定的主题与现有文献一致。医院中以患者为中心的物理治疗目标的有效记录需要精心设计的工具和专业间的合作。此外,了解专业的自我概念和承认物理治疗师需要独立设定目标的情况是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Oxygen Consumption and Metabolic Equivalents During Physical Activities in Stroke: A Systematic Review. The Role of Muscle Architecture as a Determinant of Functional Performance in Women With Knee Osteoarthritis. Whole-Body Vibration Without Visual Feedback on Postural Steadiness in Unilateral Trans-Femoral Traumatic Amputees: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cold Water Immersion, Heart Rate Variability and Post-Exercise Recovery: A Systematic Review. Physiotherapists' Use of Attentional Focus Instructions and Feedback in the Philippines: A Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1