Development of a brief screening measure of unmet supportive care needs (SCNS-P&C-6) in caregivers of people with high-grade glioma.

IF 2.9 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1186/s41687-024-00835-4
Jill Chen, Joanne M Shaw, Haryana M Dhillon, Georgia K B Halkett, Emma McDougall, Anna K Nowak, Rachel Campbell
{"title":"Development of a brief screening measure of unmet supportive care needs (SCNS-P&C-6) in caregivers of people with high-grade glioma.","authors":"Jill Chen, Joanne M Shaw, Haryana M Dhillon, Georgia K B Halkett, Emma McDougall, Anna K Nowak, Rachel Campbell","doi":"10.1186/s41687-024-00835-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Informal caregivers of people with high grade glioma (HGG) often have high levels of unmet support needs. Routine screening for unmet needs can facilitate appropriate and timely access to supportive care. We aimed to develop a brief screening tool for HGG caregiver unmet needs, based on the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Partners & Caregivers (SCNS-P&C).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis was performed on responses to the SCNS-P&C from 188 HGG caregivers, who participated in the Care-IS trial. SCNS-P&C items were assessed against four criteria: factor loadings; prevalence; variation in domain score; diagnostic accuracy. Supplementary analysis was conducted at two timepoints (T1 & T2) on the final selected items to identify caregivers indicating no needs on the screening items but reported a need on the original SCNS-P&C, suggesting they would be \"missed\" by the screening items.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six items performed best against psychometric criteria, capturing two domains: Cancer impact needs and Information and communication needs. Supplementary analysis showed screening items failed to identify only 7.4% (14/188) of caregivers with other unmet needs at T1 and 11.4% (18/158) at T2. Of those missed at T1, only four were missed again at T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified six-items for inclusion in a brief screening tool, the SCNS-P&C-6, demonstrating good sensitivity in detecting unmet needs of caregivers of people with HGG. Use of this tool in clinical practice has the potential to improve access to care and the cancer experience for both the caregiver and person with brain tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-024-00835-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Informal caregivers of people with high grade glioma (HGG) often have high levels of unmet support needs. Routine screening for unmet needs can facilitate appropriate and timely access to supportive care. We aimed to develop a brief screening tool for HGG caregiver unmet needs, based on the Supportive Care Needs Survey-Partners & Caregivers (SCNS-P&C).

Methods: Secondary analysis was performed on responses to the SCNS-P&C from 188 HGG caregivers, who participated in the Care-IS trial. SCNS-P&C items were assessed against four criteria: factor loadings; prevalence; variation in domain score; diagnostic accuracy. Supplementary analysis was conducted at two timepoints (T1 & T2) on the final selected items to identify caregivers indicating no needs on the screening items but reported a need on the original SCNS-P&C, suggesting they would be "missed" by the screening items.

Results: Six items performed best against psychometric criteria, capturing two domains: Cancer impact needs and Information and communication needs. Supplementary analysis showed screening items failed to identify only 7.4% (14/188) of caregivers with other unmet needs at T1 and 11.4% (18/158) at T2. Of those missed at T1, only four were missed again at T2.

Conclusions: We identified six-items for inclusion in a brief screening tool, the SCNS-P&C-6, demonstrating good sensitivity in detecting unmet needs of caregivers of people with HGG. Use of this tool in clinical practice has the potential to improve access to care and the cancer experience for both the caregiver and person with brain tumor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高级胶质瘤患者护理人员未满足支持性护理需求(SCNS-P&C-6)的简短筛查措施的发展
目的:高级别胶质瘤(HGG)患者的非正式照顾者通常有高水平的未满足的支持需求。对未满足需求的常规筛查可促进适当和及时获得支持性护理。我们的目标是基于支持性护理需求调查-合作伙伴和护理人员(SCNS-P&C),开发一种针对HGG护理人员未满足需求的简短筛查工具。方法:对188名参加Care-IS试验的HGG护理人员对SCNS-P&C的反应进行二次分析。SCNS-P&C项目根据四个标准进行评估:因子负荷;患病率;领域得分变异;诊断准确性。在两个时间点(T1和T2)对最终选择的项目进行补充分析,以确定在筛选项目上没有需求但在原始SCNS-P&C上报告有需求的护理人员,这表明他们会被筛选项目“遗漏”。结果:根据心理测量标准,六个项目表现最佳,捕获两个领域:癌症影响需求和信息和沟通需求。补充分析显示,筛查项目在T1和T2时未能识别出其他未满足需求的护理人员仅为7.4%(14/188)和11.4%(18/158)。在T1错过的,只有4个在T2再次错过。结论:我们确定了六个项目纳入一个简短的筛选工具,SCNS-P&C-6,在检测HGG患者照顾者未满足的需求方面表现出良好的敏感性。在临床实践中使用该工具有可能改善护理人员和脑肿瘤患者获得护理和癌症体验的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of quality of life in Gestational diabetes mellitus care - results of the pre-test of the disease-specific questionnaire GDM-QOL. Validation of the Multiple Myeloma Symptom and Impact Questionnaire (MySIm-Q) in patients with multiple myeloma who were enrolled in the CARTITUDE-4 trial. Quality of life questionnaires in patients with acromegaly: a scoping review. Psychometric properties and local normative references of PSC-17, RCADS-25, CATS-2, SNAP-IV, MCHAT-R/F, and CAST: data from a nationwide sample in Greece. Artificial intelligence and patient reported outcomes in ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1