Exploring Sexual Harassment in Agriculture From a Socio-Ecological Perspective: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1177/15248399241305393
Jody Oomen Early, Vanessa Lani Gordon-Dseagu, Victoria Breckwich Vásquez, Kimberly Prado, Dennise Drury
{"title":"Exploring Sexual Harassment in Agriculture From a Socio-Ecological Perspective: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Jody Oomen Early, Vanessa Lani Gordon-Dseagu, Victoria Breckwich Vásquez, Kimberly Prado, Dennise Drury","doi":"10.1177/15248399241305393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplace sexual harassment (WSH) and other forms of sexual violence are pervasive in the agricultural sector, yet remain overlooked as critical occupational health and safety concerns. In this scoping review, the social-ecological model was used as a framework to examine contributing and protective factors in the literature that inform WSH interventions, policy, and research. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocols, the authors searched eight databases using Boolean terms related to \"sexual harassment\" and \"agriculture.\" Articles that were peer-reviewed, empirical, and nonempirical, published in English, available as full-text, and pertaining to agriculture were included in the sample. A total of 93 articles were found, and 20 met inclusion criteria. Results showed most studies were qualitative and exploratory. A number of contributing factors were discussed in the literature, including: harmful gender beliefs and myths, gender inequity and inequality, hierarchical workplace structures, poverty, precarious immigration status, language barriers, permissive workplace climate, fear of retaliation, a need for culturally responsive workplace training, and lack of clear anti-harassment workplace policies. There is also a lack of legal protections for agricultural workers at the state and federal levels, highlighting the need for advocacy and policy reform. The socio-ecological model (SEM) offers a comprehensive approach to understanding and addressing WSH across the spectrum of prevention. More empirical and longitudinal studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base for developing comprehensive solutions to WSH that address the many barriers and risks that agricultural workers face.</p>","PeriodicalId":47956,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Practice","volume":" ","pages":"15248399241305393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241305393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace sexual harassment (WSH) and other forms of sexual violence are pervasive in the agricultural sector, yet remain overlooked as critical occupational health and safety concerns. In this scoping review, the social-ecological model was used as a framework to examine contributing and protective factors in the literature that inform WSH interventions, policy, and research. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocols, the authors searched eight databases using Boolean terms related to "sexual harassment" and "agriculture." Articles that were peer-reviewed, empirical, and nonempirical, published in English, available as full-text, and pertaining to agriculture were included in the sample. A total of 93 articles were found, and 20 met inclusion criteria. Results showed most studies were qualitative and exploratory. A number of contributing factors were discussed in the literature, including: harmful gender beliefs and myths, gender inequity and inequality, hierarchical workplace structures, poverty, precarious immigration status, language barriers, permissive workplace climate, fear of retaliation, a need for culturally responsive workplace training, and lack of clear anti-harassment workplace policies. There is also a lack of legal protections for agricultural workers at the state and federal levels, highlighting the need for advocacy and policy reform. The socio-ecological model (SEM) offers a comprehensive approach to understanding and addressing WSH across the spectrum of prevention. More empirical and longitudinal studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base for developing comprehensive solutions to WSH that address the many barriers and risks that agricultural workers face.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社会生态学的角度探讨农业中的性骚扰:一个范围综述。
工作场所性骚扰和其他形式的性暴力在农业部门普遍存在,但作为严重的职业健康和安全问题仍然被忽视。在这一范围审查中,社会生态模型被用作一个框架,以检查文献中的促进因素和保护因素,这些因素为WSH干预措施、政策和研究提供了信息。使用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项(PRISMA)协议,作者使用与“性骚扰”和“农业”相关的布尔术语搜索了8个数据库。样本中包括了同行评议的、经验性的和非经验性的、以英文出版的、可获得全文的、与农业有关的文章。共发现93篇文章,其中20篇符合纳入标准。结果显示,大多数研究是定性和探索性的。文献中讨论了一些促成因素,包括:有害的性别信仰和神话、性别不平等和不平等、等级工作场所结构、贫困、不稳定的移民身份、语言障碍、宽容的工作场所氛围、对报复的恐惧、需要适应文化的工作场所培训,以及缺乏明确的反骚扰工作场所政策。在州和联邦层面,农业工人也缺乏法律保护,这突出表明需要进行宣传和政策改革。社会生态模型(SEM)提供了一种全面的方法来理解和解决跨预防范围的水卫生问题。需要进行更多的实证和纵向研究,以加强证据基础,从而制定解决农业工人面临的许多障碍和风险的水卫生综合解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Practice
Health Promotion Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Health Promotion Practice (HPP) publishes authoritative articles devoted to the practical application of health promotion and education. It publishes information of strategic importance to a broad base of professionals engaged in the practice of developing, implementing, and evaluating health promotion and disease prevention programs. The journal"s editorial board is committed to focusing on the applications of health promotion and public health education interventions, programs and best practice strategies in various settings, including but not limited to, community, health care, worksite, educational, and international settings. Additionally, the journal focuses on the development and application of public policy conducive to the promotion of health and prevention of disease.
期刊最新文献
Community-Designed Park-Building and Maintenance With the Park in a Truck Initiative. Addressing Barriers to Racial Health Disparity Policy Change Advocacy: Exploring White Defensiveness Strategies. Addressing Period Poverty: Evaluating a Free Period Product Program in a University Setting. Digitizing a Travel Health Resource: Lessons Learned From Implementing a User Experience Framework to Improve a Travel Health Website. Helping Teens Move + Thrive: Adolescents' Preferences for Online Exercise Videos.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1