Riya A Pursnani, Ashish Saxena, Ajay Parihar, Shikhar P Chauhan, Neha Verma, Gururamchandran Pushparekha
{"title":"Comparing the Existence of Golden Proportion Using Maxillary Anterior Teeth Dimensions in Primary and Permanent Dentition: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Riya A Pursnani, Ashish Saxena, Ajay Parihar, Shikhar P Chauhan, Neha Verma, Gururamchandran Pushparekha","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>The golden proportion is based on the premise that there is a link between natural beauty and mathematics. The study aimed to analyze the mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in primary and permanent dentition to determine whether a golden proportion exists among them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty subjects were randomly selected in accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were divided into two groups, each comprising 30 children with primary dentition between 3 and 6 years old, and 30 children with permanent dentition between 12 and 13 years old. Intraoral photographs were taken using a smartphone (in-built sensor: Sony IMX890, focal length: 24 mm, aperture: f/1.8) and a cheek retractor, with the head upright and the occlusal plane parallel to the floor. The distance between the participant and the camera was fixed at 4 cm. The digital photographic images were transferred to a computer, and the perceived mesiodistal width was measured for anterior teeth using Adobe Photoshop CS (version 8) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratio of lateral incisor to central incisor was not found to differ significantly between permanent and primary dentition (<i>p</i>-value > 0.05). However, the ratio of canine to lateral incisor was significantly greater in primary dentition compared to permanent dentition (<i>p</i>-value < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that the golden proportion was inconsistent in terms of relative tooth width in primary dentition.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The golden proportion existing in permanent dentition serves as a guide for restoring severely mutilated anterior teeth, so it is important to assess whether the golden proportion exists in primary dentition.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Pursnani RA, Saxena A, Parihar A, <i>et al.</i> Comparing the Existence of Golden Proportion Using Maxillary Anterior Teeth Dimensions in Primary and Permanent Dentition: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1206-1210.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"17 11","pages":"1206-1210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims and background: The golden proportion is based on the premise that there is a link between natural beauty and mathematics. The study aimed to analyze the mesiodistal width of maxillary anterior teeth in primary and permanent dentition to determine whether a golden proportion exists among them.
Materials and methods: Sixty subjects were randomly selected in accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants were divided into two groups, each comprising 30 children with primary dentition between 3 and 6 years old, and 30 children with permanent dentition between 12 and 13 years old. Intraoral photographs were taken using a smartphone (in-built sensor: Sony IMX890, focal length: 24 mm, aperture: f/1.8) and a cheek retractor, with the head upright and the occlusal plane parallel to the floor. The distance between the participant and the camera was fixed at 4 cm. The digital photographic images were transferred to a computer, and the perceived mesiodistal width was measured for anterior teeth using Adobe Photoshop CS (version 8) software.
Results: The ratio of lateral incisor to central incisor was not found to differ significantly between permanent and primary dentition (p-value > 0.05). However, the ratio of canine to lateral incisor was significantly greater in primary dentition compared to permanent dentition (p-value < 0.05).
Conclusion: The study revealed that the golden proportion was inconsistent in terms of relative tooth width in primary dentition.
Clinical significance: The golden proportion existing in permanent dentition serves as a guide for restoring severely mutilated anterior teeth, so it is important to assess whether the golden proportion exists in primary dentition.
How to cite this article: Pursnani RA, Saxena A, Parihar A, et al. Comparing the Existence of Golden Proportion Using Maxillary Anterior Teeth Dimensions in Primary and Permanent Dentition: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(11):1206-1210.