Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w
Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon
{"title":"Orthopedic surgeon level joint angle assessment with artificial intelligence based on photography: a pilot study.","authors":"Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Chang Hyun Doh, Hui Ben, Ji Yeon Park, Kyoung-Hwan Koh, Hangsik Shin, In-Ho Jeon","doi":"10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The AI-based algorithm demonstrated performance comparable to that of human observers in quantifying shoulder and elbow ROM from clinical photographs. For shoulder internal rotation, the AI approach showed potential for improved consistency compared to traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 1","pages":"131-142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM) is crucial for evaluating patient progress. Traditional manual goniometry often lacks precision and is subject to inter-observer variability, especially in measuring shoulder internal rotation (IR). This study introduces an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach that uses clinical photography to improve the accuracy of ROM quantification. We analyzed a total of 150 clinical photographs, including 100 shoulder and 50 elbow images, taken between January and April 2022. An MMPose model with an HR-NET backbone architecture, pre-trained on the COCO-WholeBody dataset, was used to detect 17 anatomical landmarks. A random forest classifier (PoseRF) then categorized poses, and ROM angles were calculated. Concurrently, two clinicians independently measured shoulder IR at the vertebral level, and inter-observer agreement was evaluated. Linear regression analyses were conducted to correlate the AI-derived measurements with the clinicians' assessments. The AI-based algorithm accurately detected anatomical landmarks in 96% of shoulder and 100% of elbow images. Pose detection achieved 95% accuracy overall, with 100% accuracy for specific shoulder (abduction, flexion, external rotation) and elbow (flexion, extension) poses. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between the AI algorithm and human observers ranged from 0.965 to 0.997, indicating excellent inter-observer reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test showed no statistically significant differences in ROM measurements among the AI algorithm and two human observers across all joint angles (p > 0.05). The AI-based algorithm demonstrated performance comparable to that of human observers in quantifying shoulder and elbow ROM from clinical photographs. For shoulder internal rotation, the AI approach showed potential for improved consistency compared to traditional methods.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于摄影的人工智能骨科医生水平关节角度评估:一项试点研究。
准确评估肩关节活动度(ROM)是评估患者进展的关键。传统的手工测角法往往缺乏精度,并且受到观察者之间的变化,特别是在测量肩部内旋(IR)时。本研究介绍了一种基于人工智能(AI)的方法,该方法使用临床摄影来提高ROM量化的准确性。我们分析了总共150张临床照片,包括100张肩部和50张肘部图像,拍摄于2022年1月至4月。采用HR-NET骨架结构的MMPose模型,在COCO-WholeBody数据集上进行预训练,检测17个解剖标志。然后使用随机森林分类器(PoseRF)对姿态进行分类,并计算ROM角度。同时,两名临床医生独立测量了椎体水平的肩部IR,并评估了观察者之间的一致性。进行线性回归分析,将人工智能得出的测量结果与临床医生的评估相关联。基于人工智能的算法在96%的肩部和100%的肘部图像中准确地检测到解剖标志。姿势检测的总体准确率达到95%,对于特定的肩部(外展、屈曲、外旋)和肘部(屈曲、伸展)姿势的准确率达到100%。人工智能算法与人类观察者之间的类内相关系数(ICCs)在0.965 ~ 0.997之间,表明观察者间的可靠性很好。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示,人工智能算法和两名人类观察者在所有关节角度上的ROM测量值无统计学差异(p > 0.05)。基于人工智能的算法在从临床照片中量化肩部和肘部ROM方面表现出与人类观察者相当的性能。对于肩部内旋,与传统方法相比,人工智能方法显示出提高一致性的潜力。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s13534-024-00432-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity Analysis of Microstrip Patch Antenna Genres: Slotted and Through-hole Microstrip Patch Antenna. Unveiling the endocrine connections of NAFLD: evidence from a comprehensive mendelian randomization study. Brain-inspired learning rules for spiking neural network-based control: a tutorial. Alzheimer's disease recognition based on waveform and spectral speech signal processing. A high performance heterogeneous hardware architecture for brain computer interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1