Parent Perceptions of Behavior Analytic Interventions.

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-29 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3
Jillian B Wilson, Roseanne S Lesack
{"title":"Parent Perceptions of Behavior Analytic Interventions.","authors":"Jillian B Wilson, Roseanne S Lesack","doi":"10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current trends in the general American population favor parenting strategies with a relationship-focused approach highlighting secure attachment, respecting children, parenting proactively, showing empathic leadership, and using positive discipline. However, these strategies generally have not been validated by the research literature or may be based on behavior analytic strategies without reference to their origins. Although behavior analytic strategies have been shown to be effective throughout decades of research, these approaches have acquired a negative reputation in many communities with the perception of applied behavior analysis (ABA) being cold, harsh, and robotic. This study seeks to assess parental perceptions of ABA interventions, the likelihood of using those interventions, and parental preference for the integration of relationship-focused aspects into behavioral interventions. Results for antecedent-, reinforcement-, and punishment-based interventions are presented followed by a discussion about improving rapport, treatment adherence, and enhancing the perception of ABA.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":"17 4","pages":"1050-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current trends in the general American population favor parenting strategies with a relationship-focused approach highlighting secure attachment, respecting children, parenting proactively, showing empathic leadership, and using positive discipline. However, these strategies generally have not been validated by the research literature or may be based on behavior analytic strategies without reference to their origins. Although behavior analytic strategies have been shown to be effective throughout decades of research, these approaches have acquired a negative reputation in many communities with the perception of applied behavior analysis (ABA) being cold, harsh, and robotic. This study seeks to assess parental perceptions of ABA interventions, the likelihood of using those interventions, and parental preference for the integration of relationship-focused aspects into behavioral interventions. Results for antecedent-, reinforcement-, and punishment-based interventions are presented followed by a discussion about improving rapport, treatment adherence, and enhancing the perception of ABA.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对行为分析干预的看法。
目前,美国人普遍倾向于以关系为中心的育儿策略,强调安全的依恋,尊重孩子,主动育儿,表现出同理心的领导,并使用积极的纪律。然而,这些策略通常没有得到研究文献的验证,或者可能是基于行为分析策略而没有参考其起源。尽管行为分析策略在几十年的研究中被证明是有效的,但这些方法在许多社区中获得了负面的声誉,人们认为应用行为分析(ABA)是冷酷、苛刻和机械的。本研究旨在评估父母对ABA干预的看法,使用这些干预的可能性,以及父母对将以关系为中心的方面整合到行为干预中的偏好。本文提出了基于前提、强化和惩罚的干预措施的结果,然后讨论了改善关系、治疗依从性和增强ABA感知的问题。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: On the Use and Benefits of Electronic Data Collection Systems: A Tutorial on Countee. Vocational Skill Fluency Through Frequency Building. Parent Perceptions of Behavior Analytic Interventions. The Challenges Associated with Changing Practice: Barriers to Implementing Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions in ABA Settings. Evaluating the Efficacy of and Preference for Interactive Computer Training with Student-Generated Examples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1