Implementation processes and capacity-building needs in Ontario maternal-newborn care hospital settings: a cross-sectional survey.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02643-z
Jessica Reszel, Olivia Daub, Sandra I Dunn, Christine E Cassidy, Kaamel Hafizi, Marnie Lightfoot, Dahlia Pervez, Ashley Quosdorf, Allison Wood, Ian D Graham
{"title":"Implementation processes and capacity-building needs in Ontario maternal-newborn care hospital settings: a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Jessica Reszel, Olivia Daub, Sandra I Dunn, Christine E Cassidy, Kaamel Hafizi, Marnie Lightfoot, Dahlia Pervez, Ashley Quosdorf, Allison Wood, Ian D Graham","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02643-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal-newborn care does not always align with the best available evidence. Applying implementation science to change initiatives can help move evidence-informed practices into clinical settings. However, it remains unknown to what extent current implementation practices in maternal-newborn care align with recommendations from implementation science, and how confident nurses, other health professionals, and leaders are completing steps in the implementation process. We aimed to understand Ontario maternal-newborn teams' (1) approaches to implementing practice changes and the extent to which their implementation processes aligned with an implementation science planned-action framework; and (2) perceptions of importance and confidence completing implementation activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey between September-November 2023. Using purposive sampling, we invited Ontario maternal-newborn nurses, other healthcare professionals, and leaders who had experience participating in or leading implementation projects to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was informed by an implementation science framework, which includes three core phases (identify issue; build solutions; implement, evaluate, sustain). The questions probed respondents' perceptions of frequency of completion, importance, and confidence for each of the 28 implementation activities. We used descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions and grouped the written responses into categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 73 responses from 57 Ontario maternal-newborn hospitals, the majority being nurses in point-of-care and leadership roles. Nearly all respondents agreed that each of the 28 implementation activities were important. Respondents reported always completing a median of 8 out of 28 activities, with the number of activities completed declining from phase 1 through to 3. Most respondents indicated they were somewhat confident completing the implementation activities and agreed their teams would benefit from increasing their knowledge and skills to use an evidence-informed approach to implementing practice changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite viewing implementation activities as important, many teams are not consistently doing them and lack confidence, particularly in later phases of the implementation process. These findings inform where further capacity-building and supports may be needed to enable maternal-newborn nurses, other healthcare professionals, and leaders to apply implementation science to their change initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11702017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02643-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal-newborn care does not always align with the best available evidence. Applying implementation science to change initiatives can help move evidence-informed practices into clinical settings. However, it remains unknown to what extent current implementation practices in maternal-newborn care align with recommendations from implementation science, and how confident nurses, other health professionals, and leaders are completing steps in the implementation process. We aimed to understand Ontario maternal-newborn teams' (1) approaches to implementing practice changes and the extent to which their implementation processes aligned with an implementation science planned-action framework; and (2) perceptions of importance and confidence completing implementation activities.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey between September-November 2023. Using purposive sampling, we invited Ontario maternal-newborn nurses, other healthcare professionals, and leaders who had experience participating in or leading implementation projects to complete an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was informed by an implementation science framework, which includes three core phases (identify issue; build solutions; implement, evaluate, sustain). The questions probed respondents' perceptions of frequency of completion, importance, and confidence for each of the 28 implementation activities. We used descriptive statistics for the closed-ended questions and grouped the written responses into categories.

Results: We received 73 responses from 57 Ontario maternal-newborn hospitals, the majority being nurses in point-of-care and leadership roles. Nearly all respondents agreed that each of the 28 implementation activities were important. Respondents reported always completing a median of 8 out of 28 activities, with the number of activities completed declining from phase 1 through to 3. Most respondents indicated they were somewhat confident completing the implementation activities and agreed their teams would benefit from increasing their knowledge and skills to use an evidence-informed approach to implementing practice changes.

Conclusions: Despite viewing implementation activities as important, many teams are not consistently doing them and lack confidence, particularly in later phases of the implementation process. These findings inform where further capacity-building and supports may be needed to enable maternal-newborn nurses, other healthcare professionals, and leaders to apply implementation science to their change initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安大略省孕产妇-新生儿护理医院的实施进程和能力建设需求:一项横断面调查。
背景:孕产妇-新生儿护理并不总是与现有的最佳证据相一致。将实施科学应用于变革举措可以帮助将循证实践推向临床环境。然而,目前尚不清楚孕产妇-新生儿保健的实施实践在多大程度上符合实施科学的建议,以及护士、其他卫生专业人员和领导人在多大程度上有信心完成实施过程中的步骤。我们的目的是了解安大略省孕产妇-新生儿团队(1)实施实践变化的方法,以及他们的实施过程与实施科学计划-行动框架一致的程度;(2)对完成实施活动的重要性和信心的认知。方法:我们于2023年9 - 11月进行了横断面调查。采用有目的的抽样方法,我们邀请安大略省的母婴护士、其他医疗保健专业人员和有参与或领导实施项目经验的领导完成一份在线问卷。调查问卷以实施科学框架为依据,其中包括三个核心阶段(确定问题;构建解决方案;实施、评估、维持)。这些问题探讨了受访者对28项实施活动中每项活动的完成频率、重要性和信心的看法。我们对封闭式问题使用描述性统计,并将书面回答分类。结果:我们收到了来自安大略省57家母婴医院的73份回复,其中大多数是护理点和领导角色的护士。几乎所有答复国都同意,28项执行活动中的每一项都很重要。受访者表示,在28项活动中,完成的中位数为8项,完成的活动数量从第一阶段下降到第三阶段。大多数答复者表示,他们对完成实施活动有一定的信心,并同意他们的团队将受益于增加他们的知识和技能,以使用循证方法来实施实践变更。结论:尽管认为实现活动是重要的,但许多团队并没有始终如一地执行它们,并且缺乏信心,特别是在实现过程的后期阶段。这些发现表明,在哪些方面可能需要进一步的能力建设和支持,以使母婴护士、其他医疗保健专业人员和领导人能够将实施科学应用于其变革举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue among nurses: a study in a tertiary hospital. Effectiveness of room-of-error interventions for healthcare providers: a systematic review. Investigating the status of the second victims of error and related factors in nurses: a description study. Multiple Sclerosis Nursing to Improve Care and Education (MSNICE): an observational study. Nursing professionalism and associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1