Burnout among South African nurses during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic: a holistic investigation.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-02938-9
Natasha Khamisa, Siyanda Madala, Cyril Bernsah Fonka
{"title":"Burnout among South African nurses during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic: a holistic investigation.","authors":"Natasha Khamisa, Siyanda Madala, Cyril Bernsah Fonka","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02938-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The wellbeing of health care workers (HCWs) has been an ongoing challenge, especially within low and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as South Africa. Evidence suggesting that HCWs are increasingly stressed and burned out is cause for concern. Nurses in particular have been impacted physically, mentally and psychosocially during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. This may leave a disproportionate consequence, affecting various aspects of their wellbeing, thereby justifying a need for a more holistic investigation of the wellbeing of South African nurses and their coping mechanisms during the peak of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study design. Online self-reported questionnaires were administered in six hospitals, sampled purposively and conveniently from three South African provinces. Using STATA 18.0, the Wilcoxon Ranksum test at 5% alpha compared the wellbeing and coping mechanisms of nursing staff and nursing management during COVID-19's peak. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with burnout in nurses, at a 95% confidence interval (CI). Validated scales measuring burnout, coping, resilience, as well as mental and physical health were utilised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 139 participants, 112(97.4%) were females, with 91(82%) and 20(18%) being nursing staff and management respectively. The median age of the participants was 43.3 years (n = 112), with a practising duration of 12 years (n = 111). There was a significant difference in the burnout score between nursing staff and nursing management (p = 0.028). In the univariable linear regression model, burnout was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the Brief COPE Inventory (BCI), Conor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRS), Global Mental and Health Scale (GMHS), Global Physical and Health Scale (GPHS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as occupation. In the multivariable linear regression model, burnout was significantly associated with the CDRS [Coeff.=0.7, 95%CI 0.4; 0.9], GMHS [Coeff.=-2.4, 95%CI -3.2; -1.6], GPHS [Coeff.2.1, 95%CI 1.3; 2.9], and HADS [Coeff.=0.7, 95%CI 0.2; 1.2].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Investigating multiple aspects of wellbeing in this study, it's shown that coping and resilience may not be key factors in promoting the wellbeing of South African nurses. However, effective mental health interventions are crucial and should be prioritised to mitigate burnout during future health emergencies. Future studies examining the associations between general health, coping and resilience may help generate further evidence towards holistic interventions aimed at promoting nurses' wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02938-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The wellbeing of health care workers (HCWs) has been an ongoing challenge, especially within low and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as South Africa. Evidence suggesting that HCWs are increasingly stressed and burned out is cause for concern. Nurses in particular have been impacted physically, mentally and psychosocially during the recent COVID-19 pandemic. This may leave a disproportionate consequence, affecting various aspects of their wellbeing, thereby justifying a need for a more holistic investigation of the wellbeing of South African nurses and their coping mechanisms during the peak of the pandemic.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study design. Online self-reported questionnaires were administered in six hospitals, sampled purposively and conveniently from three South African provinces. Using STATA 18.0, the Wilcoxon Ranksum test at 5% alpha compared the wellbeing and coping mechanisms of nursing staff and nursing management during COVID-19's peak. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with burnout in nurses, at a 95% confidence interval (CI). Validated scales measuring burnout, coping, resilience, as well as mental and physical health were utilised.

Results: Of 139 participants, 112(97.4%) were females, with 91(82%) and 20(18%) being nursing staff and management respectively. The median age of the participants was 43.3 years (n = 112), with a practising duration of 12 years (n = 111). There was a significant difference in the burnout score between nursing staff and nursing management (p = 0.028). In the univariable linear regression model, burnout was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with the Brief COPE Inventory (BCI), Conor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRS), Global Mental and Health Scale (GMHS), Global Physical and Health Scale (GPHS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as occupation. In the multivariable linear regression model, burnout was significantly associated with the CDRS [Coeff.=0.7, 95%CI 0.4; 0.9], GMHS [Coeff.=-2.4, 95%CI -3.2; -1.6], GPHS [Coeff.2.1, 95%CI 1.3; 2.9], and HADS [Coeff.=0.7, 95%CI 0.2; 1.2].

Conclusion: Investigating multiple aspects of wellbeing in this study, it's shown that coping and resilience may not be key factors in promoting the wellbeing of South African nurses. However, effective mental health interventions are crucial and should be prioritised to mitigate burnout during future health emergencies. Future studies examining the associations between general health, coping and resilience may help generate further evidence towards holistic interventions aimed at promoting nurses' wellbeing.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行高峰期南非护士的职业倦怠:一项全面调查
背景:卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的福祉一直是一个持续的挑战,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),如南非。有证据表明医护人员的压力越来越大,精疲力竭,这值得关注。在最近的COVID-19大流行期间,护士在身体、精神和心理社会方面受到的影响尤其严重。这可能造成不成比例的后果,影响到她们福祉的各个方面,因此有必要在大流行高峰期对南非护士的福祉及其应对机制进行更全面的调查。方法:采用横断面研究设计。在线自我报告的调查问卷在南非三个省的六家医院进行了有目的和方便的抽样。使用STATA 18.0, 5% alpha的Wilcoxon秩和检验比较了COVID-19高峰期护理人员和护理管理人员的幸福感和应对机制。采用单变量和多变量线性回归分析确定与护士职业倦怠相关的因素,置信区间为95%。使用了有效的测量倦怠、应对、恢复力以及心理和身体健康的量表。结果139名参与者中,女性112人(97.4%),护理人员91人(82%),管理人员20人(18%)。参与者的中位年龄为43.3岁(n = 112),练习时间为12年(n = 111)。护理人员与护理管理人员的倦怠得分差异有统计学意义(p = 0.028)。结论:本研究调查了幸福感的多个方面,发现应对和弹性可能不是促进南非护士幸福感的关键因素。然而,有效的精神卫生干预措施至关重要,应优先考虑在未来突发卫生事件中减轻倦怠。未来研究一般健康、应对和恢复力之间的关系,可能有助于为旨在促进护士福祉的整体干预提供进一步的证据。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Influencing factors of innovative leadership of clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. The influence of responsible leadership on nurse's career calling: a moderated mediation model of public service motivation and moral identity. Implementing nurse-led decarbonization practices: a transferable framework from a Spanish public hospital. Nursing decision-making for health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: the ENVISION study. Predicted positions and qualification mismatch for master of nursing graduates in Croatian hospitals: cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1