Estimating the Tinnitus Spectrum: A Comparison Between At-Home and Laboratory Measurements.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00043
Jennifer J Lentz, Yi Liu
{"title":"Estimating the Tinnitus Spectrum: A Comparison Between At-Home and Laboratory Measurements.","authors":"Jennifer J Lentz, Yi Liu","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to provide proof of concept for at-home measurements of the tinnitus spectrum.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nineteen participants completed pitch similarity ratings in the laboratory and at home. All participants first completed laboratory tests (at 500-16000 Hz) and then later completed at-home tests (at 250-8000 Hz) using their own personal computers and headphones. Six participants repeated these measurements after at least 3 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tinnitus spectra (plots of pitch similarity rating vs. frequency) were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots for frequencies that were common to both environments (500-8000 Hz). Although the Bland-Altman plots indicated that absolute ratings used by participants differed in the two settings with online ratings tending to be higher than lab ratings, the regression analysis indicated that the tinnitus spectra had similar shapes (evidenced by significantly positive slopes) between the two environments for 14 of the 19 participants. Similar results were evident for test-retest reliability of the six returning participants in both settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that the pitch similarity rating method is potentially viable for measuring tinnitus pitch at home. At-home implementation could expedite clinical tinnitus assessments and could be used in conjunction with at-home implementations of tinnitus treatment strategies. However, future studies should include participants who are tested at home prior to being tested in the lab and include an evaluation of extended high frequencies at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJA-24-00043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to provide proof of concept for at-home measurements of the tinnitus spectrum.

Method: Nineteen participants completed pitch similarity ratings in the laboratory and at home. All participants first completed laboratory tests (at 500-16000 Hz) and then later completed at-home tests (at 250-8000 Hz) using their own personal computers and headphones. Six participants repeated these measurements after at least 3 weeks.

Results: Tinnitus spectra (plots of pitch similarity rating vs. frequency) were analyzed using linear regression and Bland-Altman plots for frequencies that were common to both environments (500-8000 Hz). Although the Bland-Altman plots indicated that absolute ratings used by participants differed in the two settings with online ratings tending to be higher than lab ratings, the regression analysis indicated that the tinnitus spectra had similar shapes (evidenced by significantly positive slopes) between the two environments for 14 of the 19 participants. Similar results were evident for test-retest reliability of the six returning participants in both settings.

Conclusions: We conclude that the pitch similarity rating method is potentially viable for measuring tinnitus pitch at home. At-home implementation could expedite clinical tinnitus assessments and could be used in conjunction with at-home implementations of tinnitus treatment strategies. However, future studies should include participants who are tested at home prior to being tested in the lab and include an evaluation of extended high frequencies at home.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计耳鸣频谱:家庭和实验室测量之间的比较。
目的:本研究的目的是为在家测量耳鸣频谱提供概念证明。方法:19名参与者分别在实验室和家中完成音高相似度评分。所有参与者首先完成实验室测试(500-16000 Hz),然后使用他们自己的个人电脑和耳机完成家庭测试(250-8000 Hz)。六名参与者在至少三周后重复了这些测量。结果:耳鸣频谱(音高相似等级与频率的图)使用线性回归和Bland-Altman图对两种环境(500- 8000hz)共同的频率进行分析。尽管Bland-Altman图显示,在两种环境中,参与者使用的绝对评分存在差异,其中在线评分倾向于高于实验室评分,但回归分析表明,19名参与者中有14人的耳鸣光谱在两种环境中具有相似的形状(由显著的正斜率证明)。在两种情况下,六名返回参与者的重测信度也明显相似。结论:音高相似度评定法在国内测量耳鸣音高是可行的。在家实施可以加快临床耳鸣评估,并可与在家实施耳鸣治疗策略结合使用。然而,未来的研究应该包括在实验室测试之前在家中进行测试的参与者,并包括在家中对延长的高频进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Masseteric Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Comparative Study Between Children and Adults. Estimating Earphone Level and Dose Using Real-Ear Measures and Ecological Momentary Assessment. Inpatient Audiologic Services Facilitate Early Hearing Detection. The Effect of Contralateral Routing of Signal Devices on the Quality of Life of Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients and Their Frequent Communication Partners. Estimating the Tinnitus Spectrum: A Comparison Between At-Home and Laboratory Measurements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1