Artificial Doctors: Performance of Chatbots as a Tool for Patient Education on Keratoconus.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1097/ICL.0000000000001160
Zeynep Özer Özcan, Levent Doğan, Ibrahim Edhem Yilmaz
{"title":"Artificial Doctors: Performance of Chatbots as a Tool for Patient Education on Keratoconus.","authors":"Zeynep Özer Özcan, Levent Doğan, Ibrahim Edhem Yilmaz","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to compare the answers given by ChatGPT, Bard, and Copilot and that obtained from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) website to patient-written questions related to keratoconus in terms of accuracy, understandability, actionability, and readability to find out whether chatbots can be used in patient education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty patient-written questions obtained from the AAO website related to keratoconus were asked to ChatGPT, Bard, and Copilot. Two ophthalmologists independently assessed the answers obtained from chatbots and the AAO website in terms of accuracy, understandability, and actionability according to the Structure of Observed Learning Outcome taxonomy, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Understandability, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Actionability tests, respectively. The answers were also compared for readability according to the Flesch Reading Ease scores obtained through the website.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bard had significantly higher scores compared with ChatGPT-3.5, Copilot, and AAO website according to Structure of Observed Learning Outcome taxonomy and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Understandability ( P <0.001 for each), whereas there was no significant difference between the other groups. Bard and ChatGPT achieved significantly higher scores than the AAO website according to the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Actionability scale ( P =0.001). The AAO website achieved significantly higher scores than the Bard on the Flesch Reading Ease scale, whereas there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P =0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chatbots are promising to provide accurate, understandable, and actionable answers. Chatbots can be a valuable aid in the education of patients with keratoconus under clinician supervision. In this way, unnecessary hospital visits can be prevented, and the burden on the health care system can be alleviated, while patient awareness can be raised.</p>","PeriodicalId":50457,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e112-e116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens-Science and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000001160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to compare the answers given by ChatGPT, Bard, and Copilot and that obtained from the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) website to patient-written questions related to keratoconus in terms of accuracy, understandability, actionability, and readability to find out whether chatbots can be used in patient education.

Methods: Twenty patient-written questions obtained from the AAO website related to keratoconus were asked to ChatGPT, Bard, and Copilot. Two ophthalmologists independently assessed the answers obtained from chatbots and the AAO website in terms of accuracy, understandability, and actionability according to the Structure of Observed Learning Outcome taxonomy, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Understandability, and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Actionability tests, respectively. The answers were also compared for readability according to the Flesch Reading Ease scores obtained through the website.

Results: Bard had significantly higher scores compared with ChatGPT-3.5, Copilot, and AAO website according to Structure of Observed Learning Outcome taxonomy and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Understandability ( P <0.001 for each), whereas there was no significant difference between the other groups. Bard and ChatGPT achieved significantly higher scores than the AAO website according to the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Actionability scale ( P =0.001). The AAO website achieved significantly higher scores than the Bard on the Flesch Reading Ease scale, whereas there was no significant difference between the other groups ( P =0.017).

Conclusion: Chatbots are promising to provide accurate, understandable, and actionable answers. Chatbots can be a valuable aid in the education of patients with keratoconus under clinician supervision. In this way, unnecessary hospital visits can be prevented, and the burden on the health care system can be alleviated, while patient awareness can be raised.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工医生:聊天机器人作为圆锥角膜患者教育工具的表现。
目的:我们将ChatGPT、Bard和Copilot从美国眼科学会(American Academy of Ophthalmology, AAO)网站上获得的答案与患者自述的圆锥角膜相关问题的准确性、可理解性、可操作性和可读性进行比较,以确定聊天机器人是否可以用于患者教育。方法:从AAO网站上获得的与圆锥角膜相关的患者书面问题20个,分别向ChatGPT、Bard和Copilot询问。两位眼科医生分别根据观察学习成果分类结构、患者教育材料评估工具-可理解性和患者教育材料评估工具-可操作性测试,独立评估从聊天机器人和AAO网站获得的答案的准确性、可理解性和可操作性。根据从网站获得的Flesch Reading Ease分数,对答案的可读性进行了比较。结果:根据观察学习成果分类结构和患者教育材料评估工具-可理解性(p),巴德的得分明显高于ChatGPT-3.5, Copilot和AAO网站。结论:聊天机器人有望提供准确,可理解和可操作的答案。在临床医生的监督下,聊天机器人可以成为圆锥角膜患者教育的宝贵援助。通过这种方式,可以避免不必要的医院就诊,减轻卫生保健系统的负担,同时可以提高患者的意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice is the official journal of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists (CLAO), an international educational association for anterior segment research and clinical practice of interest to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and other vision care providers and researchers. Focusing especially on contact lenses, it also covers dry eye disease, MGD, infections, toxicity of drops and contact lens care solutions, topography, cornea surgery and post-operative care, optics, refractive surgery and corneal stability (eg, UV cross-linking). Peer-reviewed and published six times annually, it is a highly respected scientific journal in its field.
期刊最新文献
Revised Calculation of the Prevalence of Keratoconus Based on Updated Scheimpflug Corneal Tomography Metrics in a Pediatric Population From a Chicago-Based School Age Vision Clinic. Long-Term Monitoring of an Intracorneal Bee Stinger Using Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy. Two Cases of Polymicrobial Keratitis Involving Distinct and Unusual Anaerobes. Successful Management of a Rare Keratitis Caused by Mycobacterium Immunogenum After a Series of Misdiagnoses. Sex- and Age-Related Variations in Symptoms and Signs of Dupilumab-Associated Ocular Surface Diseases in Colombian Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1