Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02289
Aylin A Hanne, Sizhu Han, Anna Schubö
{"title":"Neural Evidence for Feature-based Distractor Inhibition.","authors":"Aylin A Hanne, Sizhu Han, Anna Schubö","doi":"10.1162/jocn_a_02289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. Although there is a growing body of literature on distractor location learning, the understanding of distractor feature learning remains limited. In the current study, we investigated distractor feature learning by using EEG measures. We assumed that learning benefits distractor handling, and we investigated the role of intertrial priming in distractor feature learning. Furthermore, we examined whether distractor feature learning influences later visual working memory (VWM) performance. Participants performed an adapted variant of the additional singleton task with a distractor that appeared more often in a specific color. The behavioral results provided additional evidence that observers can use distractor feature regularities to reduce distractor interference. At the neural level, we found a reduced PD with high-probability compared with low-probability distractors, suggesting that less suppression is required when the distractor appears in the more likely color. This reduced need for suppression was partly driven by intertrial priming. The PD elicited by repeated high-probability trials decreased over time, indicating that experience with the distractor reduced the need for suppression. In addition, the results showed that distractor feature learning did not affect VWM performance. Overall, our findings demonstrate that distractor feature learning decreases the interference of a salient distractor while also benefitting from intertrial priming processes, thereby improving attentional selection. In addition, it seems that learned distractor feature inhibition is not maintained in VWM when the task context is changed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_02289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interference from a salient distractor is typically reduced when the appearance of the distractor follows either spatial or feature-based regularities. Although there is a growing body of literature on distractor location learning, the understanding of distractor feature learning remains limited. In the current study, we investigated distractor feature learning by using EEG measures. We assumed that learning benefits distractor handling, and we investigated the role of intertrial priming in distractor feature learning. Furthermore, we examined whether distractor feature learning influences later visual working memory (VWM) performance. Participants performed an adapted variant of the additional singleton task with a distractor that appeared more often in a specific color. The behavioral results provided additional evidence that observers can use distractor feature regularities to reduce distractor interference. At the neural level, we found a reduced PD with high-probability compared with low-probability distractors, suggesting that less suppression is required when the distractor appears in the more likely color. This reduced need for suppression was partly driven by intertrial priming. The PD elicited by repeated high-probability trials decreased over time, indicating that experience with the distractor reduced the need for suppression. In addition, the results showed that distractor feature learning did not affect VWM performance. Overall, our findings demonstrate that distractor feature learning decreases the interference of a salient distractor while also benefitting from intertrial priming processes, thereby improving attentional selection. In addition, it seems that learned distractor feature inhibition is not maintained in VWM when the task context is changed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于特征的干扰物抑制的神经证据。
当显著干扰物的出现遵循空间或基于特征的规律时,显著干扰物的干扰通常会减少。尽管关于干扰物位置学习的文献越来越多,但对干扰物特征学习的理解仍然有限。在本研究中,我们利用脑电测量来研究分心物特征学习。我们假设学习有利于分心物处理,并研究了试间启动在分心物特征学习中的作用。此外,我们还研究了分心物特征学习是否会影响后期视觉工作记忆(VWM)的表现。参与者完成了额外的单一任务的一个改编版本,其中有一个更经常以特定颜色出现的分心物。行为学结果进一步证明了观察者可以利用干扰物特征规律来减少干扰物的干扰。在神经层面,我们发现与低概率的干扰物相比,高概率的PD减少,这表明当干扰物以更可能的颜色出现时,需要的抑制更少。抑制需求的减少部分是由审间启动引起的。重复高概率试验引起的PD随着时间的推移而减少,表明对分心物的体验减少了对抑制的需求。此外,研究结果表明,分心物特征学习不影响VWM的表现。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,分心物特征学习减少了显著分心物的干扰,同时也受益于试验间启动过程,从而改善了注意选择。此外,当任务情境发生改变时,习得的分心物特征抑制在VWM中似乎并不维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
期刊最新文献
Task-dependent Modulation Masking of a 4-Hz Envelope Following Responses. Presenting Natural Continuous Speech in a Multisensory Immersive Environment Improves Speech Comprehension and Reflects the Allocation of Processing Resources in Neural Speech Tracking. EEG Decoding of Conscious versus Unconscious Representations during Binocular Rivalry. Exploring Dynamic Brain Oscillations in Motor Imagery and Low-frequency Sound. Salient, Unexpected Omissions of Sounds Can Involuntarily Distract Attention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1