Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention for the Family Caregiver Attending Primary Health Care Setting: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13121145
Ammena Y Binsaleh, Mahmoud S Abdallah, Basma Mohamed Osman, Mostafa M Bahaa, Nawal Alsubaie, Thanaa A Elmasry, Mohamed Yasser, Mamdouh Eldesoqui, Abdel-Naser Abdel-Atty Gadallah, Manal A Hamouda, Nashwa Eltantawy, Fatma A Mokhtar, Ramy M El Sabaa
{"title":"Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention for the Family Caregiver Attending Primary Health Care Setting: A Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Ammena Y Binsaleh, Mahmoud S Abdallah, Basma Mohamed Osman, Mostafa M Bahaa, Nawal Alsubaie, Thanaa A Elmasry, Mohamed Yasser, Mamdouh Eldesoqui, Abdel-Naser Abdel-Atty Gadallah, Manal A Hamouda, Nashwa Eltantawy, Fatma A Mokhtar, Ramy M El Sabaa","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been identified as one of the top ten public health threats facing humanity. <b>Aim:</b> The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship educational intervention on family caregivers' knowledge and practices in primary healthcare settings in Egypt. <b>Methods:</b> A quasi-experimental, one-group pretest-posttest design involving a sample of 300 family caregivers attending family health centers. The data were collected using questionnaires that assessed caregiver knowledge and self-reported practices regarding AMR before and after the intervention (primary outcomes). The intervention combined tailored knowledge and practice components that carefully evaluated participants' knowledge regarding AMR, health risk, antibiotic usage, and prevention of infection. Furthermore, their practice of using antibiotics, including previous antibiotic exposure, their antibiotic use during the past year, reasons for taking antibiotics, ways of obtaining antibiotics, and reasons for discontinuing of antibiotic therapy were also recorded. <b>Results:</b> The pre-intervention assessment revealed poor knowledge and practice regarding antibiotic use. Post-intervention, mean knowledge scores increased significantly from 18.36 to 23.28 (t = 19.5, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), while mean practice scores improved from 9.83 to 12.37 (t = 6.4, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The intervention successfully improved caregivers' knowledge and practices regarding AMR. However, there are some limitations that could affect the generalization, and the impact of the results such as the relatively small sample size recruited from a single center, lack of a control group, reliance on self-reported data, and lack of long-term follow-up. Future studies should aim to address these constraints in order to assess the intervention's effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has been identified as one of the top ten public health threats facing humanity. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of an antimicrobial stewardship educational intervention on family caregivers' knowledge and practices in primary healthcare settings in Egypt. Methods: A quasi-experimental, one-group pretest-posttest design involving a sample of 300 family caregivers attending family health centers. The data were collected using questionnaires that assessed caregiver knowledge and self-reported practices regarding AMR before and after the intervention (primary outcomes). The intervention combined tailored knowledge and practice components that carefully evaluated participants' knowledge regarding AMR, health risk, antibiotic usage, and prevention of infection. Furthermore, their practice of using antibiotics, including previous antibiotic exposure, their antibiotic use during the past year, reasons for taking antibiotics, ways of obtaining antibiotics, and reasons for discontinuing of antibiotic therapy were also recorded. Results: The pre-intervention assessment revealed poor knowledge and practice regarding antibiotic use. Post-intervention, mean knowledge scores increased significantly from 18.36 to 23.28 (t = 19.5, p < 0.0001), while mean practice scores improved from 9.83 to 12.37 (t = 6.4, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The intervention successfully improved caregivers' knowledge and practices regarding AMR. However, there are some limitations that could affect the generalization, and the impact of the results such as the relatively small sample size recruited from a single center, lack of a control group, reliance on self-reported data, and lack of long-term follow-up. Future studies should aim to address these constraints in order to assess the intervention's effectiveness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗菌药物管理干预家庭护理人员参加初级卫生保健设置:一项准实验研究。
背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)已被确定为人类面临的十大公共卫生威胁之一。目的:本研究的目的是评估抗菌药物管理教育干预对埃及初级卫生保健机构家庭护理人员的知识和实践的影响。方法:采用准实验、一组前测后测设计,选取300名在家庭保健中心就诊的家庭照顾者为样本。数据是通过问卷收集的,该问卷评估了护理者在干预前后关于AMR的知识和自我报告的做法(主要结果)。干预措施结合了量身定制的知识和实践组成部分,仔细评估了参与者关于抗菌素耐药性、健康风险、抗生素使用和预防感染的知识。此外,还记录了他们使用抗生素的做法,包括以前的抗生素暴露情况、过去一年的抗生素使用情况、服用抗生素的原因、获得抗生素的方式以及停止抗生素治疗的原因。结果:干预前评估显示对抗生素使用的知识和实践不足。干预后,知识平均分由18.36分提高到23.28分(t = 19.5, p < 0.0001),实践平均分由9.83分提高到12.37分(t = 6.4, p < 0.0001)。结论:干预成功地提高了护理人员对抗菌素耐药性的认识和实践。然而,有一些限制可能会影响推广和结果的影响,例如从单个中心招募的样本量相对较小,缺乏对照组,依赖于自我报告的数据,以及缺乏长期随访。未来的研究应着眼于解决这些限制,以评估干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Principal Component Analysis Strategies Lead to Anti-Tuberculosis Natural Product Discovery from Actinomycetes. Evaluation of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Emulsion on Biofilm-Associated Components of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Strains. A VersaTile Approach to Reprogram the Specificity of the R2-Type Tailocin Towards Different Serotypes of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotic Prescription Practice and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study from Jordan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1