Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of de Quervain Tenosynovitis: A Randomised Control Open Label Equivalence Trial.

Prasenjit Chowley, Harajit Biswas, Keshab Mondal, Shrabasti Hazra, Sandipan Hazra, Pallab DAS
{"title":"Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of de Quervain Tenosynovitis: A Randomised Control Open Label Equivalence Trial.","authors":"Prasenjit Chowley, Harajit Biswas, Keshab Mondal, Shrabasti Hazra, Sandipan Hazra, Pallab DAS","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> De Quervain (DQ) tenosynovitis is a frequent source of wrist pain amongst middle-aged adults. Steroid injections are recommended after conservative methods fail, despite unclear mechanisms. The effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for DQ is not well-studied. To address this gap, we conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of PRP and corticosteroid (CS) injections for treating DQ. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective, randomised and open-label trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. Adult patients aged 18-60 were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided triamcinolone acetonide injections or autologous PRP in the first extensor compartment. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 1, 4 and 12 weeks using the VAS and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires. <b>Results:</b> Eighty-six age- and sex-matched patients, with an average disease duration of 14 weeks in both groups, were enrolled. Both the CS and PRP groups demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores and improvement in functions at 1, 4 and 12 weeks. However, between the groups, the degree of improvement in pain was more in CS group at 1 week and similar improvements between the groups at 4 and 12 weeks. Regarding hand function, the CS group exhibited notable at 1 and 4 weeks based on the QuickDASH scale. Yet, by the 12th week, hand function improvements were comparable between both groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that PRP is equivalent to CS in reducing pain in DQ tenosynovitis. Hand function improved more significantly in the CS group at 1 and 4 weeks post-injection. Both PRP and CS are safe and equally effective treatments for DQ. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level I (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: De Quervain (DQ) tenosynovitis is a frequent source of wrist pain amongst middle-aged adults. Steroid injections are recommended after conservative methods fail, despite unclear mechanisms. The effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for DQ is not well-studied. To address this gap, we conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of PRP and corticosteroid (CS) injections for treating DQ. Methods: This prospective, randomised and open-label trial was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in India. Adult patients aged 18-60 were randomly assigned to receive either ultrasound-guided triamcinolone acetonide injections or autologous PRP in the first extensor compartment. Outcomes were measured at baseline and at 1, 4 and 12 weeks using the VAS and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires. Results: Eighty-six age- and sex-matched patients, with an average disease duration of 14 weeks in both groups, were enrolled. Both the CS and PRP groups demonstrated a significant reduction in pain scores and improvement in functions at 1, 4 and 12 weeks. However, between the groups, the degree of improvement in pain was more in CS group at 1 week and similar improvements between the groups at 4 and 12 weeks. Regarding hand function, the CS group exhibited notable at 1 and 4 weeks based on the QuickDASH scale. Yet, by the 12th week, hand function improvements were comparable between both groups. Conclusions: This study suggests that PRP is equivalent to CS in reducing pain in DQ tenosynovitis. Hand function improved more significantly in the CS group at 1 and 4 weeks post-injection. Both PRP and CS are safe and equally effective treatments for DQ. Level of Evidence: Level I (Therapeutic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富血小板血浆与皮质类固醇注射治疗去Quervain腱鞘炎:一项随机对照开放标签等效试验。
背景:德Quervain (DQ)型腱鞘炎是中年人手腕疼痛的常见原因。在保守方法失败后,建议注射类固醇,尽管机制尚不清楚。富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗DQ的有效性尚未得到充分研究。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较PRP和皮质类固醇(CS)注射治疗DQ的疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、随机和开放标签试验在印度的一家三级保健医院进行。18-60岁的成年患者被随机分配接受超声引导的曲安奈德注射或在第一伸肌室接受自体PRP。使用VAS和手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)问卷在基线和1、4和12周测量结果。结果:86例年龄和性别匹配的患者入组,两组平均病程为14周。CS组和PRP组在1周、4周和12周时均表现出疼痛评分显著降低和功能改善。然而,在两组之间,CS组在1周时疼痛的改善程度更大,在4周和12周时两组之间的改善程度相似。在手部功能方面,根据QuickDASH量表,CS组在第1周和第4周表现显著。然而,到第12周时,两组患者的手部功能改善具有可比性。结论:本研究提示PRP在减轻DQ型腱鞘炎疼痛方面与CS相当。注射后1周和4周,CS组手部功能改善更为显著。PRP和CS都是安全且同样有效的DQ治疗方法。证据等级:I级(治疗性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
Palmar Z-Osteotomy for Distal Radius Fractures. Pinning the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint in Abduction Can Reduce Skin Irritation from Suzuki Frame Treatment for Metacarpophalangeal Joint Fractures. Risk Factors Associated with Collapse of Distal Radius Fractures after Volar Locking Plate Fixation in Older Adults. Sensory Nerve Transfer for Intractable Neuropathic Pain in a Case of C8-T1 Root Avulsion in Brachial Plexus Injury. Silicone Locking-Liner Socket with a Lightweight Aesthetic Prosthesis for Short Congenital Forearm Stumps: A Report of Two Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1