Efficacy of Cefiderocol Against Endophthalmitis Isolates.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13121236
Brennan Schilling, Michael Hii, Hazel Q Shanks, Eric G Romanowski, Jonathan B Mandell, Robert M Q Shanks, Michael Zegans
{"title":"Efficacy of Cefiderocol Against Endophthalmitis Isolates.","authors":"Brennan Schilling, Michael Hii, Hazel Q Shanks, Eric G Romanowski, Jonathan B Mandell, Robert M Q Shanks, Michael Zegans","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Endophthalmitis is an intraocular microbial infection that can lead to permanent blindness, even with prompt anti-microbial therapy. Multi-drug-resistant organisms are on the rise, potentially limiting the efficacy of current empiric antibiotic therapies of intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin. Cefiderocol is a recent FDA- and EMA-approved antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. <b>Methods:</b> To better understand its potential utility in the treatment of ocular infections, the MIC of cefiderocol was compared to ceftazidime and amikacin in endophthalmitis bacterial isolates using Epsilometer testing. Because vancomycin is commonly given concomitantly as part of empiric endophthalmitis treatment, possible synergistic and antagonistic effects of concomitant vancomycin and cefiderocol were also evaluated. <b>Results:</b> Cefiderocol was found to have lower MIC values compared to ceftazidime for <i>Pseudomonadales</i> or <i>Enterobacterales</i> species. When comparing the MICs of cefiderocol and vancomycin, there appeared to be no antagonism between the two antibiotics. <b>Conclusions:</b> This is the first report exploring the use of cefiderocol in endophthalmitis strains. The results of this study show this is a promising antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms but further research is needed to investigate its intraocular safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Endophthalmitis is an intraocular microbial infection that can lead to permanent blindness, even with prompt anti-microbial therapy. Multi-drug-resistant organisms are on the rise, potentially limiting the efficacy of current empiric antibiotic therapies of intravitreal ceftazidime and vancomycin. Cefiderocol is a recent FDA- and EMA-approved antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Methods: To better understand its potential utility in the treatment of ocular infections, the MIC of cefiderocol was compared to ceftazidime and amikacin in endophthalmitis bacterial isolates using Epsilometer testing. Because vancomycin is commonly given concomitantly as part of empiric endophthalmitis treatment, possible synergistic and antagonistic effects of concomitant vancomycin and cefiderocol were also evaluated. Results: Cefiderocol was found to have lower MIC values compared to ceftazidime for Pseudomonadales or Enterobacterales species. When comparing the MICs of cefiderocol and vancomycin, there appeared to be no antagonism between the two antibiotics. Conclusions: This is the first report exploring the use of cefiderocol in endophthalmitis strains. The results of this study show this is a promising antibiotic for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms but further research is needed to investigate its intraocular safety profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头孢地罗治疗分离性眼内炎疗效观察。
背景/目的:眼内炎是一种眼内微生物感染,即使及时进行抗微生物治疗也可导致永久性失明。多重耐药生物正在增加,这可能会限制目前玻璃体内注射头孢他啶和万古霉素等经典性抗生素治疗的疗效。Cefiderocol是最近获得FDA和ema批准的用于治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性细菌的抗生素。方法:应用Epsilometer检测头孢地罗与头孢他啶和阿米卡星对眼内炎细菌分离株的MIC进行比较,以更好地了解其在眼部感染治疗中的潜在作用。由于万古霉素通常作为经验性眼内炎治疗的一部分同时给予,因此也评估了万古霉素和头孢地罗同时使用可能的协同和拮抗作用。结果:与头孢他啶相比,头孢地醇对假单胞菌或肠杆菌的MIC值更低。当比较头孢地罗和万古霉素的mic时,两种抗生素之间似乎没有拮抗作用。结论:本文首次报道头孢地罗治疗眼内炎。本研究结果表明,这是一种治疗多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌的有前景的抗生素,但需要进一步研究其眼内安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia During the 2023-2024 European Re-Emergence: Why Severity Does Not Predict Macrolide Resistance. Evaluating the Impact of Filmarray Pneumonia Plus Panel in Therapeutic Decision-Making in Critical Patients with Suspected Respiratory Infection. Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Clinical Escherichia coli Isolates from Dogs in Grenada, West Indies. Impact of PA-100 AST System Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Test on Antibiotic Prescription for Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Spanish Primary Care Settings. Expanding Diagnostic Options for Pediatric Meningitis: BCID2 Testing Results on Cerebrospinal Fluid After a Negative Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1