Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0425
Mamata V Kene, Dana R Sax, Reena Bhargava, Madeline J Somers, E Margaret Warton, Jennifer Y Zhang, Adina S Rauchwerger, Mary E Reed
{"title":"Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?","authors":"Mamata V Kene, Dana R Sax, Reena Bhargava, Madeline J Somers, E Margaret Warton, Jennifer Y Zhang, Adina S Rauchwerger, Mary E Reed","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Telemedicine use increased substantially with the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding of the impact of telemedicine modality (video vs. phone) on post-telemedicine acute care for higher risk conditions is limited. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective study of telemedicine visits, comparing video with telephone, for selected diagnoses with potentially higher illness acuity, evaluating post-telemedicine emergency department (ED) and hospitalization rates. In a large, multicenter cohort of adult patient-initiated primary care telemedicine visits from March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021, we evaluated 7-day ED and hospitalization rates for higher acuity diagnostic categories (cardiac, gastrointestinal, and respiratory) by telemedicine modality, provider familiarity, and patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Among 431,705 telemedicine encounters, 128,129 (29.7%) were video visits and 303,576 (70.3%) were telephone visits. Adjusting for patient and appointment factors, telephone encounters for cardiac conditions were associated with significantly higher 7-day ED visit rates than video encounters (5.5% vs. 4.9%, respectively) but similar hospitalization rates (0.7% vs. 0.8%, respectively); for gastrointestinal conditions, post-telemedicine adjusted ED and hospitalization rates were comparable between telemedicine modalities (4.0% for ED and 1.2% vs. 1.3% for hospitalization, respectively); among respiratory conditions, video encounters were associated with higher ED and hospitalization rates than telephone encounters (ED: 5.9% after video vs. 5.2% after phone; hospitalization: 1.9% after video vs. 1.5% after phone). Telemedicine encounters with patients' own primary care provider (PCP) were associated with lower adjusted rates of ED use across all conditions and modalities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Short-term ED and hospitalization rates following primary care video or telephone visits for selected acute, high-risk conditions varied by condition and PCP familiarity. Nuanced use of video visits may confer benefits triaging to downstream acute care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0425","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Telemedicine use increased substantially with the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding of the impact of telemedicine modality (video vs. phone) on post-telemedicine acute care for higher risk conditions is limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of telemedicine visits, comparing video with telephone, for selected diagnoses with potentially higher illness acuity, evaluating post-telemedicine emergency department (ED) and hospitalization rates. In a large, multicenter cohort of adult patient-initiated primary care telemedicine visits from March 1, 2020, to July 31, 2021, we evaluated 7-day ED and hospitalization rates for higher acuity diagnostic categories (cardiac, gastrointestinal, and respiratory) by telemedicine modality, provider familiarity, and patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Among 431,705 telemedicine encounters, 128,129 (29.7%) were video visits and 303,576 (70.3%) were telephone visits. Adjusting for patient and appointment factors, telephone encounters for cardiac conditions were associated with significantly higher 7-day ED visit rates than video encounters (5.5% vs. 4.9%, respectively) but similar hospitalization rates (0.7% vs. 0.8%, respectively); for gastrointestinal conditions, post-telemedicine adjusted ED and hospitalization rates were comparable between telemedicine modalities (4.0% for ED and 1.2% vs. 1.3% for hospitalization, respectively); among respiratory conditions, video encounters were associated with higher ED and hospitalization rates than telephone encounters (ED: 5.9% after video vs. 5.2% after phone; hospitalization: 1.9% after video vs. 1.5% after phone). Telemedicine encounters with patients' own primary care provider (PCP) were associated with lower adjusted rates of ED use across all conditions and modalities. Conclusions: Short-term ED and hospitalization rates following primary care video or telephone visits for selected acute, high-risk conditions varied by condition and PCP familiarity. Nuanced use of video visits may confer benefits triaging to downstream acute care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后远程医疗对未分化高敏度疾病的急性护理:一张图片胜过千言万语吗?
目的:随着COVID-19大流行,远程医疗的使用大幅增加。对远程医疗模式(视频与电话)对高风险条件下远程医疗后急性护理的影响的理解有限。方法:我们进行了一项远程医疗就诊的回顾性研究,比较视频和电话,选择诊断可能更高的疾病敏锐度,评估远程医疗后急诊科(ED)和住院率。在2020年3月1日至2021年7月31日的一项大型多中心队列研究中,研究人员通过远程医疗方式、提供者熟悉度、患者社会人口统计学和临床特征评估了7天ED和高锐诊断类别(心脏、胃肠和呼吸)的住院率。结果:431,705次远程医疗就诊中,视频就诊128,129次(29.7%),电话就诊303,576次(70.3%)。调整患者和预约因素后,心脏病患者的电话就诊7天急诊科就诊率显著高于视频就诊(分别为5.5%和4.9%),但住院率相似(分别为0.7%和0.8%);对于胃肠道疾病,远程医疗后调整ED和住院率在远程医疗模式之间具有可比性(ED为4.0%,住院为1.2%,分别为1.3%);在呼吸系统疾病中,视频接触比电话接触与更高的ED和住院率相关(ED:视频后5.9% vs.电话后5.2%;住院率:视频后为1.9%,电话后为1.5%)。在所有条件和模式下,与患者自己的初级保健提供者(PCP)的远程医疗接触与较低的ED使用调整率相关。结论:对选定的急性、高危患者进行视频或电话问诊后的短期ED和住院率因病情和对PCP的熟悉程度而异。细致入微地使用视频访问可能会给下游急性护理带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Same as It Ever Was. A Systematic Review of Telemedicine Solutions to Provide Psychological Interventions for Women Receiving Fertility Treatments. Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network. Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Health Care Utilization Patterns Associated with eConsults for Headache: Insights from an Urban Academic Medical Center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1