"May we be the bridge and boat to cross the water": Community-engaged research on metta meditation.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK American Journal of Orthopsychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1037/ort0000823
Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Shah Noor Hussein, Jessica M Harrison, Xiaoyu Jennifer Zhang, Mushim P Ikeda, Maria T Chao, Shelley R Adler, Helen Y Weng
{"title":"\"May we be the bridge and boat to cross the water\": Community-engaged research on metta meditation.","authors":"Ariana Thompson-Lastad, Shah Noor Hussein, Jessica M Harrison, Xiaoyu Jennifer Zhang, Mushim P Ikeda, Maria T Chao, Shelley R Adler, Helen Y Weng","doi":"10.1037/ort0000823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inclusive research is needed to understand how contemplative practices are used by people of diverse identities. Metta meditation-also known as loving-kindness meditation-may be particularly relevant for people committed to equity and justice because of the social nature of the practice. Using community-based participatory research and an intersectional framework, we assessed how people in a diverse meditation community teach and practice metta meditation. In partnership between university researchers and a community-based meditation center, we conducted virtual focus groups on experiences with metta meditation during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze focus group data, with a member checking process to include participant feedback. Forty-seven people participated in six focus groups (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47; 62% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex or asexual; 23% Asian, 19% Black, 13% Hispanic/Latina/o, 32% White, 24% multiracial). Qualitative analysis identified three central themes: (1) the importance of a community of practice for creating a sense of belonging (including during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic); (2) the benefits of metta practice for cultivating compassion and equanimity; and (3) the use of metta practice to cope with harmful situations, including individual-level stressors and structural oppression. Metta meditation supported participants in navigating stressors and injustice. Community-based spaces designed to cultivate belonging among diverse communities can support people to connect contemplative practice with their efforts for social change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55531,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inclusive research is needed to understand how contemplative practices are used by people of diverse identities. Metta meditation-also known as loving-kindness meditation-may be particularly relevant for people committed to equity and justice because of the social nature of the practice. Using community-based participatory research and an intersectional framework, we assessed how people in a diverse meditation community teach and practice metta meditation. In partnership between university researchers and a community-based meditation center, we conducted virtual focus groups on experiences with metta meditation during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyze focus group data, with a member checking process to include participant feedback. Forty-seven people participated in six focus groups (Mage = 47; 62% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex or asexual; 23% Asian, 19% Black, 13% Hispanic/Latina/o, 32% White, 24% multiracial). Qualitative analysis identified three central themes: (1) the importance of a community of practice for creating a sense of belonging (including during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic); (2) the benefits of metta practice for cultivating compassion and equanimity; and (3) the use of metta practice to cope with harmful situations, including individual-level stressors and structural oppression. Metta meditation supported participants in navigating stressors and injustice. Community-based spaces designed to cultivate belonging among diverse communities can support people to connect contemplative practice with their efforts for social change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“愿我们成为跨越水面的桥和船”:社区参与的禅修研究。
需要进行包容性研究,以了解不同身份的人如何使用冥想练习。静心冥想——也被称为慈心冥想——可能与那些致力于公平和正义的人特别相关,因为这种练习具有社会性质。使用基于社区的参与性研究和交叉框架,我们评估了不同冥想社区的人们如何教授和练习冥想。在大学研究人员和社区冥想中心的合作下,我们对COVID-19大流行最初几个月的冥想经历进行了虚拟焦点小组讨论。我们使用反身性主题分析来分析焦点小组数据,并通过成员检查过程来包括参与者的反馈。47人参加了6个焦点小组(Mage = 47;62%的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿、双性人或无性人;23%的亚洲人,19%的黑人,13%的西班牙裔/拉丁裔,32%的白人,24%的多种族)。定性分析确定了三个中心主题:(1)实践社区对于创造归属感的重要性(包括在2019冠状病毒病大流行的最初几个月);(2)禅修对培养悲悯与宁静的益处;(3)运用禅修来应对有害情境,包括个人层面的压力源和结构性压迫。静心冥想帮助参与者驾驭压力源和不公正。以社区为基础的空间旨在培养不同社区之间的归属感,可以支持人们将冥想练习与他们为社会变革所做的努力联系起来。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry publishes articles that clarify, challenge, or reshape the prevailing understanding of factors in the prevention and correction of injustice and in the sustainable development of a humane and just society.
期刊最新文献
Health, mortality, and migration: A 15-year follow-up cohort of persons experiencing homelessness. A double betrayal: The implications of institutional betrayal for trauma-related symptoms in intimate partner violence survivors. A legal alien: Transgender men's gender identity experienced through fertility, pregnancy, and childbirth. Clinical presentations and treatment outcomes between bi+, gay/lesbian, and heterosexual adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Contemplative practices and the movement toward a more just criminal legal system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1