Food insecurity and ultra-processed food consumption in the Health and Retirement Study: Cross-sectional analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100422
Abeer A Aljahdali
{"title":"Food insecurity and ultra-processed food consumption in the Health and Retirement Study: Cross-sectional analysis.","authors":"Abeer A Aljahdali","doi":"10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher ultra-processed foods (UPF), attributed to more than half of daily intake in the US, have been associated with impaired health outcomes. Documented evidence highlights disparities in UPF consumption due to food insecurity, which is a public health challenge among older adults in the US.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study examined the link between food insecurity and UPF consumption. The potential of participants' sex, age, and race and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation in modifying the association were explored.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The analytical sample comprised 6295 US adults, aged 52 - 101 years, enrolled in the longitudinal Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative study of aging. Food insecurity was evaluated in the 2013 HRS Health Care and Nutrition Study using the six-item Short Form Food Security Survey Module. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, and UPFs, quantified using the NOVA food classification system, were expressed as a percentage of total energy intake. The association between food insecurity and UPFs was examined using linear regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of food insecurity was 15%. Mean UPFs% (95% confidence intervals) were 49.1 (47.8, 50.3), 48.5 (46.6, 50.4), and 52.3 (50.4, 54.3) among adults with food security, low food security, and very low food security, respectively (P-trend = 0.0156). Race modifies the association between food insecurity and UPFs (P-interaction = 0.0033). A positive linear trend was detected among Whites (P-trend = 0.0036), but an inverse linear trend was found among African Americans (P-trend = 0.0007). There was no evidence for heterogeneity by age, sex, or SNAP participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Food insecurity was positively correlated with UPF consumption among adults in the US. Race modifies the association with a positive linear trend among Whites and an inverse linear trend among African Americans. Further efforts are needed to promote healthy aging via improving diet quality among food-insecure older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":54778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","volume":"29 2","pages":"100422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Higher ultra-processed foods (UPF), attributed to more than half of daily intake in the US, have been associated with impaired health outcomes. Documented evidence highlights disparities in UPF consumption due to food insecurity, which is a public health challenge among older adults in the US.

Objectives: The study examined the link between food insecurity and UPF consumption. The potential of participants' sex, age, and race and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation in modifying the association were explored.

Method: The analytical sample comprised 6295 US adults, aged 52 - 101 years, enrolled in the longitudinal Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative study of aging. Food insecurity was evaluated in the 2013 HRS Health Care and Nutrition Study using the six-item Short Form Food Security Survey Module. Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire, and UPFs, quantified using the NOVA food classification system, were expressed as a percentage of total energy intake. The association between food insecurity and UPFs was examined using linear regression models, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: The prevalence of food insecurity was 15%. Mean UPFs% (95% confidence intervals) were 49.1 (47.8, 50.3), 48.5 (46.6, 50.4), and 52.3 (50.4, 54.3) among adults with food security, low food security, and very low food security, respectively (P-trend = 0.0156). Race modifies the association between food insecurity and UPFs (P-interaction = 0.0033). A positive linear trend was detected among Whites (P-trend = 0.0036), but an inverse linear trend was found among African Americans (P-trend = 0.0007). There was no evidence for heterogeneity by age, sex, or SNAP participation.

Conclusion: Food insecurity was positively correlated with UPF consumption among adults in the US. Race modifies the association with a positive linear trend among Whites and an inverse linear trend among African Americans. Further efforts are needed to promote healthy aging via improving diet quality among food-insecure older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康和退休研究中的食品不安全和超加工食品消费:横断面分析。
背景:高含量超加工食品(UPF)占美国人每日摄入量的一半以上,与健康状况受损有关。有记录的证据表明,由于粮食不安全,UPF消费存在差异,这是美国老年人面临的公共卫生挑战。目的:本研究调查了粮食不安全和UPF消费之间的联系。探讨了参与者的性别、年龄和种族以及补充营养援助计划(SNAP)参与对这种关联的影响。方法:分析样本包括6295名年龄在52 - 101岁之间的美国成年人,他们参加了纵向健康与退休研究(HRS),这是一项具有全国代表性的老龄化研究。2013年HRS卫生保健和营养研究使用六项简短形式粮食安全调查模块对粮食不安全进行了评估。使用食物频率问卷评估膳食摄入量,并使用NOVA食物分类系统量化upf,以总能量摄入的百分比表示。利用线性回归模型对粮食不安全和upf之间的关系进行了检验,并根据社会人口统计学特征进行了调整。结果:粮食不安全发生率为15%。粮食安全等级、低粮食安全等级和极低粮食安全等级的平均upf %(95%置信区间)分别为49.1(47.8,50.3)、48.5(46.6,50.4)和52.3 (50.4,54.3)(P-trend = 0.0156)。种族改变了粮食不安全和upf之间的关联(p交互作用= 0.0033)。白人群体呈线性正相关(P-trend = 0.0036),非裔美国人呈线性负相关(P-trend = 0.0007)。没有证据表明年龄、性别或SNAP参与存在异质性。结论:美国成年人的食品不安全与UPF消费呈正相关。种族改变了这种联系,在白人中呈正线性趋势,在非裔美国人中呈负线性趋势。需要进一步努力,通过改善粮食不安全老年人的饮食质量来促进健康老龄化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: There is increasing scientific and clinical interest in the interactions of nutrition and health as part of the aging process. This interest is due to the important role that nutrition plays throughout the life span. This role affects the growth and development of the body during childhood, affects the risk of acute and chronic diseases, the maintenance of physiological processes and the biological process of aging. A major aim of "The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging" is to contribute to the improvement of knowledge regarding the relationships between nutrition and the aging process from birth to old age.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor on: The impact of dietary acid load on super-agers with exceptional cognitive abilities: A propensity score analysis of national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Pauca verba on the association between protein intake and sarcopenia in older adults. Association between cardiometabolic multimorbidity, body roundness index, and frailty index in Chinese middle-aged and older adults. Differential effects of short-term and long-term ketogenic diet on gene expression in the aging mouse brain. Impact of diabetes on the progression of Alzheimer's disease via trajectories of amyloid-tau-neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1