Textbook Selection in Nursing Education: An Updated Perspective.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001804
Judy K Anderson, Lucille Downing, Susan Heitman, Vickie R Heiser, Linda J Rauch
{"title":"Textbook Selection in Nursing Education: An Updated Perspective.","authors":"Judy K Anderson, Lucille Downing, Susan Heitman, Vickie R Heiser, Linda J Rauch","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence-based guidelines about textbook selection for nursing didactic courses are lacking. Therefore, this study explored the priorities of faculty in baccalaureate nursing programs for selecting primary textbooks.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to identify the ranking of essential characteristics in nursing textbooks, including content, general characteristics, supplemental resources, organization, and specific considerations about electronic textbooks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a cross-sectional design, a descriptive survey was conducted among faculty members across the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from 59 faculty participants demonstrated a strong preference for textbooks emphasizing clinical judgment and application to practice, with content being the top priority. Additionally, instructor resources, such as test banks and teaching strategies, were prioritized within supplemental resources. Few participants reported formal training in textbook selection, indicating a potential area for nursing education improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study found the need for further research and development of structured guidelines to aid in the textbook selection process.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based guidelines about textbook selection for nursing didactic courses are lacking. Therefore, this study explored the priorities of faculty in baccalaureate nursing programs for selecting primary textbooks.

Purpose: The study aimed to identify the ranking of essential characteristics in nursing textbooks, including content, general characteristics, supplemental resources, organization, and specific considerations about electronic textbooks.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, a descriptive survey was conducted among faculty members across the United States.

Results: Results from 59 faculty participants demonstrated a strong preference for textbooks emphasizing clinical judgment and application to practice, with content being the top priority. Additionally, instructor resources, such as test banks and teaching strategies, were prioritized within supplemental resources. Few participants reported formal training in textbook selection, indicating a potential area for nursing education improvement.

Conclusions: The study found the need for further research and development of structured guidelines to aid in the textbook selection process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理教育教科书选择:更新的视角。
背景:目前缺乏关于护理教学课程教材选择的循证指南。因此,本研究探讨护理学士学位课程教师在选择小学教科书时的优先顺序。目的:探讨电子护理教科书的基本特征排序,包括电子护理教科书的内容、一般特征、补充资源、组织结构和具体注意事项。方法:采用横断面设计,在美国各地的教师中进行描述性调查。结果:59名教师的调查结果显示,教师对强调临床判断和应用于实践的教材有强烈的偏好,内容是最重要的。此外,教师资源,如测试库和教学策略,在补充资源中被优先考虑。很少有参与者报告在教科书选择方面的正式培训,这表明护理教育的潜在改进领域。结论:研究发现需要进一步研究和开发结构化的指导方针,以帮助教科书的选择过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
Innovative Bedside Shift Reporting: Utilizing the Mad Libs™ SBAR Tool for Students. Utilizing Video Feedback to Improve Student Learning. Enhancing Nurse Practitioner Student Knowledge Base and Self-Efficacy in the Care of Acutely Ill Obstetric Patients. Flexible Assessment of Student Learning Using VARK Framework. Nursing Students' Perception of the Clinical Learning Environment: A Longitudinal, Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1