The exploration of attitudes and perspectives of mental health workers on peer support in Singapore.

Siong Yin Chua, Karel Himawan
{"title":"The exploration of attitudes and perspectives of mental health workers on peer support in Singapore.","authors":"Siong Yin Chua, Karel Himawan","doi":"10.1007/s44192-024-00125-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Using the lived experience as their expertise, peer support specialists (PSS) focus on the empowerment of individuals with mental health conditions. Despite its value, peer support services in Singapore are relatively uncommon. Perspectives from mental health workers may provide insights on targeted strategies to address the organisational changes needed for the continued growth of the lived experience workforce.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aims to explore the attitudes and perceptions of mental health workers regarding the benefits, challenges, and potential strategies in the implementation of peer support services across mental health settings in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 59 responses were gathered for an online survey via convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative data, while an inductive thematic analytic method was utilised for qualitative inputs. The coding and refinement of themes were discussed between both authors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the respondents were willing to accept PSS as a healthcare profession (72.9%), willing to work with PSS (89.8%) and perceived there should be PSS where they worked (64.4%). Key themes identified highlighted a supportive and inclusive workplace environment, the power of the lived experience, and recovery-oriented contribution as the underlying benefits and potential challenges in implementing PSS in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Policymakers could consider funding initiatives and regulatory standards to support the implementation of PSS across mental health settings in Singapore, while organisations could implement training programmes and supervision targeted at enhancing the practice of recovery-oriented care amongst its staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":"5 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-024-00125-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Using the lived experience as their expertise, peer support specialists (PSS) focus on the empowerment of individuals with mental health conditions. Despite its value, peer support services in Singapore are relatively uncommon. Perspectives from mental health workers may provide insights on targeted strategies to address the organisational changes needed for the continued growth of the lived experience workforce.

Aims: The study aims to explore the attitudes and perceptions of mental health workers regarding the benefits, challenges, and potential strategies in the implementation of peer support services across mental health settings in Singapore.

Methods: A total of 59 responses were gathered for an online survey via convenience sampling. Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative data, while an inductive thematic analytic method was utilised for qualitative inputs. The coding and refinement of themes were discussed between both authors.

Results: The majority of the respondents were willing to accept PSS as a healthcare profession (72.9%), willing to work with PSS (89.8%) and perceived there should be PSS where they worked (64.4%). Key themes identified highlighted a supportive and inclusive workplace environment, the power of the lived experience, and recovery-oriented contribution as the underlying benefits and potential challenges in implementing PSS in Singapore.

Implications: Policymakers could consider funding initiatives and regulatory standards to support the implementation of PSS across mental health settings in Singapore, while organisations could implement training programmes and supervision targeted at enhancing the practice of recovery-oriented care amongst its staff.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨新加坡精神卫生工作者对同伴支持的态度和观点。
背景:同伴支持专家(PSS)利用生活经验作为他们的专业知识,重点关注具有精神健康状况的个体的赋权。尽管它很有价值,但同侪支持服务在新加坡相对不常见。精神卫生工作者的观点可以为有针对性的战略提供见解,以解决生活体验工作人员持续增长所需的组织变革。目的:本研究旨在探讨精神卫生工作者对新加坡精神卫生机构实施同伴支持服务的好处、挑战和潜在策略的态度和看法。方法:采用方便抽样的方式,对59份问卷进行在线调查。定量数据生成描述性统计,而定性输入使用归纳专题分析方法。两位作者讨论了主题的编码和细化。结果:大多数受访者愿意接受PSS作为医疗保健专业(72.9%),愿意与PSS一起工作(89.8%),并认为他们工作的地方应该有PSS(64.4%)。确定的关键主题强调了支持性和包容性的工作环境,生活经验的力量,以及以恢复为导向的贡献,作为在新加坡实施PSS的潜在好处和潜在挑战。影响:决策者可以考虑资助倡议和监管标准,以支持在新加坡的精神卫生机构实施PSS,而组织可以实施培训方案和监督,以加强其工作人员中以康复为导向的护理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of stop smoking support by mental healthcare professionals: cross-sectional analysis of why nothing much happens. Exploring the relationship between mental health issues and academic performance of undergraduate students in a Ghanaian tertiary institution: a cross-sectional study. Accuracy of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in identifying common mental health disorders in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional analytical study. Epidemiology of loneliness & social isolation, an emerging public mental health predicament in India: a scoping review. The experience of mothers of autistic children with a pathological demand avoidance profile: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1