The value of diabetes technology enabled coaching (DTEC) to support remission evaluation of medical interventions in T2D: Patient and health coach perspectives.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000701
Madison Taylor, Denise Ng, Kaylen J Pfisterer, Joseph A Cafazzo, Diana Sherifali
{"title":"The value of diabetes technology enabled coaching (DTEC) to support remission evaluation of medical interventions in T2D: Patient and health coach perspectives.","authors":"Madison Taylor, Denise Ng, Kaylen J Pfisterer, Joseph A Cafazzo, Diana Sherifali","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The multicomponent Remission Evaluation of Medical Interventions in T2D (REMIT) program has shown reduction of hazard of diabetes relapse by 34-43%, but could benefit from improved ability to scale, spread, and sustain it. This study explored, at the conceptualization phase, patient and health coach perspectives on the acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and appropriateness of a digital REMIT adaptation (diabetes technology enabled coaching (DTEC)). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 6) and health coaches (n = 6) to explore their experiences with the REMIT study, opportunities for virtualisation, and a cognitive walkthrough of solution concepts. Transcripts were analyzed both inductively and deductively to allow for organic themes to emerge and to position these themes around the constructs of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and appropriateness while allowing new codes to emerge for discussion. Participants saw value in DTEC as: an opportunity to facilitate and extend REMIT support; a convenient, efficient, and scalable concept (acceptability); having potential to motivate through connecting behaviours to outcomes (adoption); an opportunity for lower-effort demands for sustained use (feasibility). Participants also highlighted important considerations to ensure DTEC could provide compassionate insights and support automated data entry (appropriateness). Several considerations regarding equitable access were raised and warrant further consideration including: provision of technology, training to support technology literacy, and the opportunity for DTEC to support and improve health literacy. As such, DTEC may act as a moderator that can enhance or diminish access which affects who can benefit. Provided equity considerations are addressed, DTEC has the potential to address previous shortcomings of the conventional REMIT program.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 1","pages":"e0000701"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The multicomponent Remission Evaluation of Medical Interventions in T2D (REMIT) program has shown reduction of hazard of diabetes relapse by 34-43%, but could benefit from improved ability to scale, spread, and sustain it. This study explored, at the conceptualization phase, patient and health coach perspectives on the acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and appropriateness of a digital REMIT adaptation (diabetes technology enabled coaching (DTEC)). Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients (n = 6) and health coaches (n = 6) to explore their experiences with the REMIT study, opportunities for virtualisation, and a cognitive walkthrough of solution concepts. Transcripts were analyzed both inductively and deductively to allow for organic themes to emerge and to position these themes around the constructs of acceptability, adoption, feasibility, and appropriateness while allowing new codes to emerge for discussion. Participants saw value in DTEC as: an opportunity to facilitate and extend REMIT support; a convenient, efficient, and scalable concept (acceptability); having potential to motivate through connecting behaviours to outcomes (adoption); an opportunity for lower-effort demands for sustained use (feasibility). Participants also highlighted important considerations to ensure DTEC could provide compassionate insights and support automated data entry (appropriateness). Several considerations regarding equitable access were raised and warrant further consideration including: provision of technology, training to support technology literacy, and the opportunity for DTEC to support and improve health literacy. As such, DTEC may act as a moderator that can enhance or diminish access which affects who can benefit. Provided equity considerations are addressed, DTEC has the potential to address previous shortcomings of the conventional REMIT program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study protocol for a multi-center stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to explore the usability and outcomes among young people living with HIV in Kiambu and Kirinyaga counties of Kenya, using an online health portal. Natural language processing to evaluate texting conversations between patients and healthcare providers during COVID-19 Home-Based Care in Rwanda at scale. Epidemiological methods in transition: Minimizing biases in classical and digital approaches. Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease. A data management system for precision medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1