Differences in Plasma BDNF Levels Between Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain, Fibromyalgia Syndrome, and Asymptomatic Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Di-Bonaventura Silvia, Gurdiel-Álvarez Francisco, Reina-Varona Álvaro, Pacheco-Barrios Kevin, Molina-Álvarez Miguel, Fernández-Carnero Josué, Ferrer-Peña Raúl
{"title":"Differences in Plasma BDNF Levels Between Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain, Fibromyalgia Syndrome, and Asymptomatic Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Di-Bonaventura Silvia, Gurdiel-Álvarez Francisco, Reina-Varona Álvaro, Pacheco-Barrios Kevin, Molina-Álvarez Miguel, Fernández-Carnero Josué, Ferrer-Peña Raúl","doi":"10.1177/10998004251313741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study compared plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels among chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients, chronic widespread pain patients, and asymptomatic controls. The study included 126 participants aged 18-65, divided into three groups of 42 each. Pain intensity was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and plasma BDNF levels were measured via ELISA. Differences between groups were evaluated using ANOVA with 2000 bootstrap resamples and a bias-corrected and accelerated method. Results showed significantly higher plasma BDNF levels in chronic widespread pain patients (mean difference [MD] = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.62; <i>p <</i> .001) compared to controls, and higher than in chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients (MD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.64, 1.02; <i>p <</i> .001). Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients had lower plasma BDNF levels compared to controls (MD = -0.39; 95% CI = -0.54, -0.24; <i>p <</i> .001). No significant correlations were observed between plasma BDNF levels and clinical variables. These findings suggest the potential of BDNF as a biomarker to differentiate chronic primary pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10998004251313741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004251313741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional study compared plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels among chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients, chronic widespread pain patients, and asymptomatic controls. The study included 126 participants aged 18-65, divided into three groups of 42 each. Pain intensity was assessed using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and plasma BDNF levels were measured via ELISA. Differences between groups were evaluated using ANOVA with 2000 bootstrap resamples and a bias-corrected and accelerated method. Results showed significantly higher plasma BDNF levels in chronic widespread pain patients (mean difference [MD] = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.28, 0.62; p < .001) compared to controls, and higher than in chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients (MD = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.64, 1.02; p < .001). Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain patients had lower plasma BDNF levels compared to controls (MD = -0.39; 95% CI = -0.54, -0.24; p < .001). No significant correlations were observed between plasma BDNF levels and clinical variables. These findings suggest the potential of BDNF as a biomarker to differentiate chronic primary pain conditions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛、纤维肌痛综合征和无症状受试者血浆BDNF水平的差异:一项横断面研究
这项横断面研究比较了慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者、慢性广泛性疼痛患者和无症状对照者的血浆脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平。这项研究包括126名年龄在18-65岁之间的参与者,他们被分成三组,每组42人。采用数值评定量表(NRS)评估疼痛强度,ELISA检测血浆BDNF水平。使用2000个bootstrap样本的方差分析和偏差校正和加速方法来评估组间差异。结果显示,慢性广泛性疼痛患者血浆BDNF水平明显升高(平均差异[MD] = 0.44;95% ci = 0.28, 0.62;p .001),且高于慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者(MD = 0.83;95% ci = 0.64, 1.02;p措施)。慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的血浆BDNF水平低于对照组(MD = -0.39;95% ci = -0.54, -0.24;p措施)。血浆BDNF水平与临床变量之间无显著相关性。这些发现提示BDNF作为区分慢性原发性疼痛的生物标志物的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clamping Catheter Versus Free Drainage for Patients With Neurogenic Bladder With Indwelling Urinary Catheter: A Meta-Analysis. Influencing Factors in Urinary Retention in Parturients With Epidural Anesthesia Following Term Vaginal Birth. The Impact of Exercise Training on Psychological Outcomes, Body Composition, and Quality of Life in Overweight or Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Differences in Plasma BDNF Levels Between Chronic Primary Musculoskeletal Pain, Fibromyalgia Syndrome, and Asymptomatic Subjects: A Cross-Sectional Study. Association Between Serum Albumin and the Length of Hospital Stay Among Patients With Acute Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1