The Impact of Organisational Interventions on Student Perceptions of the Learning Environment: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1111/tct.70026
Mithu Molla, Mark Servis, Tiffany Hodgens, Zainab Akinjobi, Sharad Jain
{"title":"The Impact of Organisational Interventions on Student Perceptions of the Learning Environment: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Mithu Molla,&nbsp;Mark Servis,&nbsp;Tiffany Hodgens,&nbsp;Zainab Akinjobi,&nbsp;Sharad Jain","doi":"10.1111/tct.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The learning environment (LE) refers to the social interactions, organisational culture and physical spaces that shape learners' perceptions and learning. With numerous efforts to measure and improve it, there is still a lack of clearly identified, evidence-based interventions that impact the LE. Our aims were to design LE interventions and measure their effectiveness using a comparison of student responses on the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>Root causes of problems in the LE were identified, and comprehensive interventions were then put in place. Interventions addressed three main categories where problems were identified as follows: faculty development, physician wellness, and the learning climate committee. To evaluate changes postintervention, we utilised a repeated cross-sectional design.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Deidentified item-level response data were analysed and organised as a pre-intervention period (2016–2018) and postintervention period (2021–2023). None of the mistreatment events were statistically significant between the periods, except for “required to perform personal services”. However, perceptions of faculty professionalism improved significantly in the postintervention period for all questions except the hidden curriculum (HC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Taken together, our results show that large-scale interventions may be effective at improving perceptions of faculty professionalism but have limited effect on frequency of mistreatment events. The hidden curriculum failed to show improvement with our interventions and has been identified as an area of further research and ongoing interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11717492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The learning environment (LE) refers to the social interactions, organisational culture and physical spaces that shape learners' perceptions and learning. With numerous efforts to measure and improve it, there is still a lack of clearly identified, evidence-based interventions that impact the LE. Our aims were to design LE interventions and measure their effectiveness using a comparison of student responses on the Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (AAMC GQ).

Approach

Root causes of problems in the LE were identified, and comprehensive interventions were then put in place. Interventions addressed three main categories where problems were identified as follows: faculty development, physician wellness, and the learning climate committee. To evaluate changes postintervention, we utilised a repeated cross-sectional design.

Evaluation

Deidentified item-level response data were analysed and organised as a pre-intervention period (2016–2018) and postintervention period (2021–2023). None of the mistreatment events were statistically significant between the periods, except for “required to perform personal services”. However, perceptions of faculty professionalism improved significantly in the postintervention period for all questions except the hidden curriculum (HC).

Implications

Taken together, our results show that large-scale interventions may be effective at improving perceptions of faculty professionalism but have limited effect on frequency of mistreatment events. The hidden curriculum failed to show improvement with our interventions and has been identified as an area of further research and ongoing interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织干预对学生学习环境感知的影响:一项重复横断面研究。
背景:学习环境(learning environment, LE)是指塑造学习者感知和学习的社会互动、组织文化和物理空间。尽管为衡量和改进这一目标做出了许多努力,但仍然缺乏明确确定的、以证据为基础的干预措施。我们的目的是设计LE干预措施,并通过比较学生对美国医学院协会毕业问卷(AAMC GQ)的回答来衡量其有效性。方法:确定了LE问题的根本原因,然后采取全面的干预措施。干预措施涉及三个主要类别,其中确定的问题如下:教师发展,医生健康和学习气候委员会。为了评估干预后的变化,我们采用了重复横断面设计。评估:对已确定的项目级反应数据进行分析并组织为干预前(2016-2018年)和干预后(2021-2023年)。在这两个时期之间,除了“被要求提供个人服务”外,没有任何虐待事件在统计上是显著的。然而,除了隐藏课程(HC)外,在干预后的所有问题中,教师专业精神的感知都有显著改善。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,大规模的干预措施可能有效地提高了教师的专业意识,但对虐待事件的频率影响有限。在我们的干预下,隐性课程没有显示出改善,已被确定为进一步研究和持续干预的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
The Pore-Pressure Coefficient in Saturated Soils
IF 5.8 1区 工程技术GeotechniquePub Date : 1960-12-01 DOI: 10.1680/GEOT.1960.10.4.186
A. Skempton
Pore-pressure coefficients for unsaturated soils: Generalised effective stress approach
IF 3.6 3区 工程技术Canadian Geotechnical JournalPub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2022-0164
Angelica Tuttolomondo, A. Ferrari, L. Laloui
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
期刊最新文献
How to … Co-Create Research With Medical Students Investigating TikTok Trends in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Comprehensive Descriptive Analysis TCT Referee Recognition 2024 Navigating Crossroads: Collaborative Strategies to Assess and Enhance the Quality of Clinical Learning Environments How to Harness Education Fellows to Optimise Clinical Placement Capacity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1