Continuous Glucose Monitoring Attrition in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.

Seema Meighan, Terri H Lipman, Brigit VanGraafeiland, Brynn E Marks
{"title":"Continuous Glucose Monitoring Attrition in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Seema Meighan, Terri H Lipman, Brigit VanGraafeiland, Brynn E Marks","doi":"10.1177/26350106241306058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of the study was to identify the most common reasons for and timing of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) attrition in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single center retrospective chart review included youth with T1DM <22 years seen between November 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. Data were gathered from CGM cloud-based software and the electronic medical record.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2663 youth, 88.3% (n = 2351) actively used CGM, and 5.9% (n = 311) had CGM attrition. Those who discontinued CGM were older (17.0 vs 14.9 years, <i>P</i> = .0001), had a longer T1DM duration (7.4 vs 5.1 years), higher A1C (9% vs 7.4%), and were non-Hispanic Black (NHB; 34.0% vs 11.5%). The odds of CGM attrition were 5.0 and 2.8 times higher in NHB and Latine youth, respectively, compared to non-Hispanic White youth. Median time to CGM discontinuation was 4 months, 21 days after initiation; 57% of youth who discontinued did so in the first 6 months of use. The most common reasons for CGM attrition were problems with device adhesion (18.4%), dislike device on the body (10.8%), insurance problems (9.5%), pain with device use (8.3%), and system mistrust due to inaccurate readings (8.2%). NHB and Latine youth were more likely to discontinue CGM due to insurance problems (3.2% vs 15.1% vs 16.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To support equitable, uninterrupted CGM use, education at CGM initiation should address practical approaches to improve adhesion and wearability and provide a clear pathway to obtaining supplies. Interventions to support sustained CGM use should occur within the first 6 months of initiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75187,"journal":{"name":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","volume":" ","pages":"64-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The science of diabetes self-management and care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106241306058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the most common reasons for and timing of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) attrition in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

Methods: This single center retrospective chart review included youth with T1DM <22 years seen between November 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. Data were gathered from CGM cloud-based software and the electronic medical record.

Results: Among 2663 youth, 88.3% (n = 2351) actively used CGM, and 5.9% (n = 311) had CGM attrition. Those who discontinued CGM were older (17.0 vs 14.9 years, P = .0001), had a longer T1DM duration (7.4 vs 5.1 years), higher A1C (9% vs 7.4%), and were non-Hispanic Black (NHB; 34.0% vs 11.5%). The odds of CGM attrition were 5.0 and 2.8 times higher in NHB and Latine youth, respectively, compared to non-Hispanic White youth. Median time to CGM discontinuation was 4 months, 21 days after initiation; 57% of youth who discontinued did so in the first 6 months of use. The most common reasons for CGM attrition were problems with device adhesion (18.4%), dislike device on the body (10.8%), insurance problems (9.5%), pain with device use (8.3%), and system mistrust due to inaccurate readings (8.2%). NHB and Latine youth were more likely to discontinue CGM due to insurance problems (3.2% vs 15.1% vs 16.7%).

Conclusions: To support equitable, uninterrupted CGM use, education at CGM initiation should address practical approaches to improve adhesion and wearability and provide a clear pathway to obtaining supplies. Interventions to support sustained CGM use should occur within the first 6 months of initiation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年1型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测损耗
目的:本研究的目的是确定青年1型糖尿病(T1DM)患者持续血糖监测(CGM)消耗的最常见原因和时间。结果:2663名青年中,88.3% (n = 2351)积极使用CGM, 5.9% (n = 311)有CGM减损。停用CGM的患者年龄较大(17.0 vs 14.9岁,P = 0.0001), T1DM持续时间较长(7.4 vs 5.1年),糖化血红蛋白较高(9% vs 7.4%),非西班牙裔黑人(NHB;34.0% vs 11.5%)。与非西班牙裔白人青年相比,NHB和拉丁裔青年的CGM磨损率分别高出5.0和2.8倍。停用CGM的中位时间为4个月21天;57%的青少年在使用前6个月停止使用。CGM磨损最常见的原因是设备粘附问题(18.4%),不喜欢设备在身体上(10.8%),保险问题(9.5%),设备使用疼痛(8.3%)以及由于读数不准确而导致的系统不信任(8.2%)。NHB和拉丁裔青年更有可能因保险问题而停止CGM (3.2% vs 15.1% vs 16.7%)。结论:为了支持公平、不间断地使用CGM, CGM启动时的教育应解决实际方法,以提高附着力和耐磨性,并提供明确的途径获得供应。支持持续使用CGM的干预措施应在开始使用的前6个月内进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs in the Dominican Republic (DR-DAWN2). A Minimally Time-Consuming Method for Regular, Ongoing Outcome Assessments in a Rural Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program: Validation via Retrospective Pre-Post Studies. Assessing Current Knowledge of Hearing Impairment With Diabetes by Surveying Providers With CBDCE Certification. Food Insecurity and Depressive Symptoms Among Persons With Diabetes in the United States: Findings From the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Medication-Taking Trajectory and Its Correlates in Patients With Diabetes: Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1