The science of diabetes self-management and care最新文献

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychosocial status of people with diabetes and their perceived quality of received health care services in a local outpatient center in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

Methods: Cross-sectional study that included 385 Dominican adults with diabetes. Demographic and clinical information was collected. Key psychometric indicators were collected by using the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, EuroQol-5D Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, and Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care.

Results: The mean EQ-VAS score was 77.6 (SD 18). Of all the participants, 18.7% exhibited symptoms of depression, with higher rates among women and younger age groups. Diabetes-related distress was present in 22.6% of participants, particularly among younger individuals and those employed. Physical activity was the self-care activity with the lowest reported adherence. Perceptions of received health care services aligned moderately with the chronic care model (CCM), with a higher perceived alignment in patients that were enrolled in a chronic disease management program.

Conclusions: Patients with diabetes report having a reduced quality of life and significant psychological burdens, with a high rate of depressive symptoms and diabetes-related distress and a low adherence to self-care behaviors. The enrollment in chronic disease management programs improved patients' perception of received health care services, reporting a more coordinated care and experiencing more patient activation, which could improve health outcomes. These findings underline the need for psychological screening, patient-centered care, and broader implementation of the CCM to improve health outcomes in this population.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to introduce and validate a minimally time-consuming method for regular, ongoing assessments of practice- and individual-level outcomes in a rural diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) program.

Methods: The method involves a report developed within an electronic health record system to capture the initial A1C data of patients in the program and their most recent A1C data at the time the report is run. To validate the method's ability to continuously assess outcomes, 3 retrospective pre-post studies were conducted over 3 consecutive months: October, November, and December 2023. The subjects were individuals with type 2 or type 1 diabetes who completed their initial visits in the program during these months. A1C changes in patient cohorts and their statistical significance were analyzed as practice-level outcomes, and individual-level outcomes were monitored by plotting and analyzing patient data.

Results: The report accurately captured data, enabling minimally time-consuming analyses. The method allowed both continuous assessment of program effectiveness based on A1C changes and monitoring of individual patient progress. Statistically significant reductions in average A1C were observed for subjects seen in October and December 2023 (but not in November) and across the combined data from all 3 months. Data plotting helped identify individual subjects who may benefit from follow-up.

Conclusions: The method is feasible and accurate for ongoing outcome assessments, providing timely feedback to clinicians and promoting practice changes to improve patient outcomes. It is also flexible and adaptable to other DSMES programs.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate adolescent perspectives of parent-adolescent communication, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-specific family conflict, self-efficacy, and their relationship to adolescent self-management of T1DM.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design was employed. Adolescents completed measures of parent-adolescent communication, T1DM-specific family conflict, self-efficacy, and self-management, which included activation and division of responsibility for management tasks.

Results: Surveys were completed by 113 adolescents ages 11 to 17 years (mean age 13.85 years, SD 1.78) and living with T1DM for 6 months and longer. Hierarchical multiple regression sought to determine what variables make the most unique contribution to self-management of T1DM, division of family responsibility for management tasks, and activation. Self-efficacy was a significant predictor of division of family responsibility for T1DM management, patient activation, and all self-management subscales except collaboration with parents. Openness in parent-adolescent communication was a significant predictor of the diabetes communication and goals subscale of the self-management measure and activation. Problems in communication was a significant predictor of collaboration with parents and self-management goals.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that family context characteristics, particularly parent-adolescent communication, and self-efficacy are important for engagement with self-management for adolescents living with T1DM. Findings can inform future family-focused self-management interventions to improve T1DM outcomes for adolescents living with T1DM.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore experiences with an interdisciplinary micro-choice-based concentrated group intervention for people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: A qualitative study with individual semistructured interviews were conducted with 14 adults (8 women, ages 45-74 years) with type 2 diabetes. Purposive sampling was used, and participants from 3 different intervention groups in the micro-choice-based concentrated group intervention were recruited. Thematic analysis was used for the data analysis.

Results: Three main themes were identified: (1) group intervention tailored to individual needs through friendly and skilled professionals, (2) valuable social interactions and an experience of fellowship, and (3) commitment to change through goal setting and conscious micro-choices. The participants described a readiness for change that was met by important knowledge from skilled professionals in the concentrated intervention. They reported that new knowledge, particularly about micro-choices and the focus on how insulin works in the body, led to change in their awareness and self-management. The concentrated group intervention was a preferred setting that contained a sense of community without compromising on meeting individual needs. Participants described internalized changes after the intervention and a willingness to adhere to changes necessary for their self-management.

Conclusion: Study findings showed that a micro-choice-based concentrated group intervention for people with type 2 diabetes can be a valuable approach contributing to improved patient activation and diabetes self-management. The findings underpin the importance of increased diabetes knowledge and support from an interprofessional team to bring about significant changes in everyday life.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to explore the facilitators and barriers of health behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), providing a reference for the development of health behavior interventions programs.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive research design was adopted, and interviews were conducted with 25 patients with T2D. The interview guide was developed based on the health action process approach theory. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis.

Results: Through the analysis of interview data, 2 main themes were identified: facilitators and barriers of health behaviors, comprising 18 subthemes. The facilitators included self-efficacy, outcome expectations, risk perception, intention, action planning, coping planning, emotional regulation, proactive and sustained sense of responsibility, and multidimensional social support. The barriers included insufficient disease awareness, insufficient self-control, impact of social activities, low self-efficacy, accessibility of personal conditions, lack of problem-solving skills, lack of disease management knowledge, lack of social support, and cognitive decline.

Conclusions: When designing health behavior intervention programs for patients with T2D, it is crucial to consider both facilitators and barriers to enhance the effectiveness of the interventions to encourage patients to adopt healthy lifestyles, improve their quality of life, and reduce the occurrence of complications.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to test the effectiveness of a nurse-led mobile phone intervention (NMPI) on glycemic variability and self-management among people living with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Ghana.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, the intervention group received a 3-month NMPI program plus standard care, and the control group received standard care alone in a tertiary health care setting. Ninety-eight participants (baseline A1C > 7%) were randomized 1:1 to either NMPI or standard care group. The primary study outcomes were changes in A1C testing and self-management assessed using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities tool at baseline and end of the study.

Results: The intervention group had statistically significant improvement in their mean A1C level from baseline to the end of the study. In comparison, the control group also had improvement in their mean A1C level but was not statistically significant. Consistently, the intervention participants had better statistically significant improvements in self-management behaviors than the control group. There was a medium, negative correlation between A1C changes and overall self-care changes for the intervention group, whereas that of the control group was smaller.

Conclusions: Study findings have shown that a tailored NMPI program in addition to standard care could improve glycemic variability and self-management among people living with poorly managed T2DM in Ghana better than standard care alone.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine whether food insecurity increases risk for depressive symptoms among adults with diabetes. Food insecurity is associated with depression in the general population. However, minimal research has examined this relationship among persons with diabetes.

Methods: Adults with diabetes were identified from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire. Food insecurity status was measured with the USDA 10-item food insecurity scale. Participants were categorized as food secure, low food security, and very low food security. The association between food insecurity and depressive symptoms was examined using weighted logistic regression, adjusting for potentially influential covariates (age, sex, ethnicity, poverty to income ratio, education, diabetes type, body mass index, region, and general health).

Results: Among 2595 persons with diabetes, nearly one third (29.8%) reported symptoms of depression. Over one tenth (11.7%) had low or very low food security. Persons who had low or very low food security were more than twice as likely to report depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.15, 95% CI, 1.39-3.32; AOR = 3.84, 95% CI, 2.28-6.45, respectively). Persons who were older, had higher income, and better general health were less likely to report depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: Among adults with diabetes, low or very low food security was associated with increased risk for depressive symptoms. Further research is needed to evaluate the relationship between food insecurity and depressive symptoms among persons with diabetes.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported diabetes management strategies, social determinants of health (SDOH), and barriers to care among people with diabetes receiving care in a safety-net setting to identify factors contributing to disparities in outcomes for Black and Hispanic adults and inform future interventions.

Methods: Sequential, explanatory, mixed methods study comprised a survey of adults with diabetes seen in primary care at a safety-net hospital in New England, followed by qualitative semistructured interviews with a subset of the Black and Hispanic respondents. Descriptive statistics, chi-square and t tests were used to analyze quantitative data. The health equity implementation framework was used to guide qualitative data collection and directed content analysis.

Results: A total of 496 respondents completed the survey; 48 Black and Hispanic adults participated in interviews. Diabetes-related distress was significantly higher among Black and Hispanic participants compared to White participants. Nutrition management use was significantly lower among Black and Hispanic participants. Qualitative findings suggest that SDOH and lack of education and support, specifically, nutrition and access to self-management resources, contributed to diabetes-related distress and prevented optimal self-management.

Conclusions: High rates of diabetes-related distress and low rates of nutrition management were identified in Black and Hispanic adults in a safety-net setting. Qualitative interviews demonstrated a relationship between adverse SDOH and lack of nutrition education with diabetes distress and challenges to self-management, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes. Findings suggest that increased uptake of nutrition therapy and self-management education and support may be critical for improving diabetes outcomes and promoting health equity.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the most common reasons for and timing of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) attrition in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1DM).

Methods: This single center retrospective chart review included youth with T1DM <22 years seen between November 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022. Data were gathered from CGM cloud-based software and the electronic medical record.

Results: Among 2663 youth, 88.3% (n = 2351) actively used CGM, and 5.9% (n = 311) had CGM attrition. Those who discontinued CGM were older (17.0 vs 14.9 years, P = .0001), had a longer T1DM duration (7.4 vs 5.1 years), higher A1C (9% vs 7.4%), and were non-Hispanic Black (NHB; 34.0% vs 11.5%). The odds of CGM attrition were 5.0 and 2.8 times higher in NHB and Latine youth, respectively, compared to non-Hispanic White youth. Median time to CGM discontinuation was 4 months, 21 days after initiation; 57% of youth who discontinued did so in the first 6 months of use. The most common reasons for CGM attrition were problems with device adhesion (18.4%), dislike device on the body (10.8%), insurance problems (9.5%), pain with device use (8.3%), and system mistrust due to inaccurate readings (8.2%). NHB and Latine youth were more likely to discontinue CGM due to insurance problems (3.2% vs 15.1% vs 16.7%).

Conclusions: To support equitable, uninterrupted CGM use, education at CGM initiation should address practical approaches to improve adhesion and wearability and provide a clear pathway to obtaining supplies. Interventions to support sustained CGM use should occur within the first 6 months of initiation.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess current knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding hearing impairment and screening referrals in patients with diabetes among providers who have a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CBDCE) Certification.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey created through Qualtrics was emailed to health care providers in the United States with CDCES certification. Providers responded regarding knowledge and importance of hearing impairment compared to other diabetes complications, when they would refer a patient to an audiologist, the percentage of patients referred, and awareness of over-the-counter hearing aids. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all questionnaire items.

Results: One thousand four hundred and ninety-five CDCES providers completed the survey. Participants selected the most common conditions associated with diabetes as kidney dysfunction (96.7%), retinopathy (96.5%), obesity (95.6%), and foot infection (94.5%); 44.5% chose hearing impairment. Over 60% of providers were not familiar with how to refer patients to an audiologist and acknowledged being unfamiliar with recommended screening frequency as the most common barrier. Most providers had referred fewer than 20% of patients to an audiologist. Over half of providers were not aware of over-the-counter hearing aids.

Conclusion: Among a national sample of health care providers with comprehensive knowledge in diabetes care, many providers do not associate hearing impairment with diabetes and rate other microvascular complications of higher importance.