Assessing the reliability and validity of pictorial-assisted 24-h recall for measuring hand hygiene and child faeces disposal: A cross-sectional study in Malawi
Olivier Rizk , Sarah Bick , Blessings White , Kondwani Chidziwisano , Robert Dreibelbis
{"title":"Assessing the reliability and validity of pictorial-assisted 24-h recall for measuring hand hygiene and child faeces disposal: A cross-sectional study in Malawi","authors":"Olivier Rizk , Sarah Bick , Blessings White , Kondwani Chidziwisano , Robert Dreibelbis","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheh.2024.114516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-h recall (P24 hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24 hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24 hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24 hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (−7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24 hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the better method for measuring hygiene behaviours as compared to the P24 hR method despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13994,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 114516"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hygiene and environmental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1438463924001974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Whilst improving hygiene and sanitation behaviours is key to cost-effective and sustainable water, sanitation and hygiene interventions, measuring behaviour change remains a challenge. This study assessed the validity and reliability of pictorial 24-h recall (P24 hR), a novel method using unprompted recall of past activities through pictures, compared to structured observation for measuring handwashing with soap (HWWS) and safe child faeces disposal in rural Malawi. Data were collected from 88 individuals across 74 households in Chiradzulu district using both methods over a two-day period, with the recall period of the P24 hR corresponding to the period of structured observation completed the previous day. Results showed poor agreement between P24 hR and observations in detection of hygiene opportunities and behaviours. P24 hR under-reported handwashing opportunities when frequency was high and over-reported them when frequency was low. The 95% limits of agreement for handwashing opportunities estimated through Bland-Altman analysis (−7.62 to 4.89) were unacceptably wide given median 5 opportunities observed per participant. P24 hR also over-reported HWWS and safe child faeces disposal, and kappa statistics indicated agreement no better than by chance. Structured observation remains the better method for measuring hygiene behaviours as compared to the P24 hR method despite its known limitations, including potential reactivity bias.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health serves as a multidisciplinary forum for original reports on exposure assessment and the reactions to and consequences of human exposure to the biological, chemical, and physical environment. Research reports, short communications, reviews, scientific comments, technical notes, and editorials will be peer-reviewed before acceptance for publication. Priority will be given to articles on epidemiological aspects of environmental toxicology, health risk assessments, susceptible (sub) populations, sanitation and clean water, human biomonitoring, environmental medicine, and public health aspects of exposure-related outcomes.