Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses.

Dale M Harris, Christopher Latella, Nicholas Tripodi, Steven J O'Bryan
{"title":"Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses.","authors":"Dale M Harris, Christopher Latella, Nicholas Tripodi, Steven J O'Bryan","doi":"10.1177/15459683241310984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background.</i> Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is sometimes used alongside medication to alleviate motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the evidence supporting NIBS's effectiveness for improving motor function in PD patients is uncertain. <i>Objective</i>. This umbrella review aims to synthesize recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have evaluated the effectiveness of NIBS in improving motor function in people with PD, with a key focus being to examine the quality of the evidence presented. <i>Methods.</i> The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022380544) and conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy was guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, focusing on individuals with idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-4). The review included studies comparing various NIBS techniques (eg, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) to sham or alternative treatments, targeting motor and cognitive regions. Six databases were searched up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2), and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs). <i>Results</i>. The final analysis included 31 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews. Overall, the reviews were rated as moderate quality (54% average for AMSTAR2). NIBS showed a small-to-moderate effect on motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III scores; SMD = -0.80), functional mobility (gait speed and timed-up-and-go; SMD = -0.39), and freezing of gait (SMD = -0.58), but no significant effect on balance. <i>Conclusion</i>. NIBS offers small-to-moderate benefits for motor symptoms and functional movement in PD, though it does not significantly impact balance. Practitioners should consider the variety of techniques and treatment parameters before application.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"15459683241310984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683241310984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is sometimes used alongside medication to alleviate motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the evidence supporting NIBS's effectiveness for improving motor function in PD patients is uncertain. Objective. This umbrella review aims to synthesize recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have evaluated the effectiveness of NIBS in improving motor function in people with PD, with a key focus being to examine the quality of the evidence presented. Methods. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022380544) and conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The search strategy was guided by the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome framework, focusing on individuals with idiopathic PD (Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-4). The review included studies comparing various NIBS techniques (eg, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation) to sham or alternative treatments, targeting motor and cognitive regions. Six databases were searched up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2), and random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool standardized mean differences (SMDs). Results. The final analysis included 31 meta-analyses and 10 systematic reviews. Overall, the reviews were rated as moderate quality (54% average for AMSTAR2). NIBS showed a small-to-moderate effect on motor function (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-Section III scores; SMD = -0.80), functional mobility (gait speed and timed-up-and-go; SMD = -0.39), and freezing of gait (SMD = -0.58), but no significant effect on balance. Conclusion. NIBS offers small-to-moderate benefits for motor symptoms and functional movement in PD, though it does not significantly impact balance. Practitioners should consider the variety of techniques and treatment parameters before application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索无创脑刺激对帕金森病患者身体预后的影响:一项基于meta分析的证据图谱综述
背景。非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)有时与药物一起使用,以减轻帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状。然而,支持NIBS改善PD患者运动功能有效性的证据尚不确定。目标。本综述旨在综合最近的系统综述和荟萃分析,这些综述和分析评估了NIBS在改善PD患者运动功能方面的有效性,重点是检查所提供证据的质量。方法。该评价方案在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022380544),并按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行。搜索策略以人群、干预、比较和结果框架为指导,重点关注特发性PD患者(Hoehn和Yahr阶段1-4)。该综述包括了针对运动和认知区域的各种NIBS技术(例如,重复经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激)与假治疗或替代治疗的比较研究。截至2024年6月,对6个数据库进行了搜索。采用多系统评价2 (AMSTAR2)评估方法学质量,并进行随机效应荟萃分析以汇集标准化平均差异(SMDs)。结果。最终的分析包括31项荟萃分析和10项系统综述。总的来说,评论被评为中等质量(AMSTAR2平均为54%)。NIBS对运动功能有小到中度的影响(统一帕金森病评定量表-第三部分评分;SMD = -0.80),功能活动性(步态速度和计时起身和离开;SMD = -0.39),步态冻结(SMD = -0.58),但对平衡无显著影响。结论。NIBS对PD患者的运动症状和功能性运动提供了小到中等程度的益处,尽管它对平衡没有显著影响。从业人员在应用前应考虑各种技术和治疗参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement Learning is Impaired in the Sub-acute Post-stroke Period. Post-Stroke Recovery in Relation to Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons and Perineuronal Nets. Mapping Trajectories of Gait Recovery in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Exploring Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Effects on Physical Outcomes in People With Parkinson's Disease: An Umbrella Evidence Mapping Review With Meta-analyses. Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1