Effect of magnetic field strength and segmentation variability on the reproducibility and repeatability of radiomic texture features in cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping.

Pascal Yamlome, Jennifer H Jordan
{"title":"Effect of magnetic field strength and segmentation variability on the reproducibility and repeatability of radiomic texture features in cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping.","authors":"Pascal Yamlome, Jennifer H Jordan","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03312-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study aims to assess the robustness of myocardial radiomic texture features (RTF) to segmentation variability and variations across scanners with different field strengths, addressing concerns about reliability in clinical practices. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 45 pairs of CMR T1 maps from 15 healthy volunteers using 1.5 T and 3 T Siemens scanners. Manual left ventricular myocardium segmentation and a deep learning-based model with Monte Carlo Dropout generated masks with different levels of variability and 1023 RTFs extracted from each region of interest (ROI). Reproducibility: the extent to which RTFs extracted from 1.5 T and 3 T images are consistent, and repeatability: the extent to which RTFs extracted from multiple segmentation runs at the same field strength agree with each other, were measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We categorized ICC values as excellent, good, moderate, and poor. We reported the proportion of RTFs that fell in each category. The proportion of RTFs with excellent repeatability decreased as the proportion of ROI pixels in congruence across segmentation runs decreased. Up to 31% of RTFs showed excellent repeatability, while 35% showed good repeatability across segmentation runs from the manually generated masks. Across scanners (i.e., 1.5 T vs 3 T), only 7% exhibited good reproducibility. While our results demonstrate RTF sensitivity to differences in field strength and segmentation variability, we identified certain preprocessing filters and feature classes that are less sensitive to these variations and, as such, may be good candidates for imaging biomarkers or building machine-learning models.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03312-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our study aims to assess the robustness of myocardial radiomic texture features (RTF) to segmentation variability and variations across scanners with different field strengths, addressing concerns about reliability in clinical practices. We conducted a retrospective analysis on 45 pairs of CMR T1 maps from 15 healthy volunteers using 1.5 T and 3 T Siemens scanners. Manual left ventricular myocardium segmentation and a deep learning-based model with Monte Carlo Dropout generated masks with different levels of variability and 1023 RTFs extracted from each region of interest (ROI). Reproducibility: the extent to which RTFs extracted from 1.5 T and 3 T images are consistent, and repeatability: the extent to which RTFs extracted from multiple segmentation runs at the same field strength agree with each other, were measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We categorized ICC values as excellent, good, moderate, and poor. We reported the proportion of RTFs that fell in each category. The proportion of RTFs with excellent repeatability decreased as the proportion of ROI pixels in congruence across segmentation runs decreased. Up to 31% of RTFs showed excellent repeatability, while 35% showed good repeatability across segmentation runs from the manually generated masks. Across scanners (i.e., 1.5 T vs 3 T), only 7% exhibited good reproducibility. While our results demonstrate RTF sensitivity to differences in field strength and segmentation variability, we identified certain preprocessing filters and feature classes that are less sensitive to these variations and, as such, may be good candidates for imaging biomarkers or building machine-learning models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磁场强度和分割变异性对心血管磁共振参数制图中放射体纹理特征再现性和可重复性的影响
我们的研究旨在评估心肌放射学纹理特征(RTF)对不同场强扫描仪的分割变异性和变化的稳健性,解决临床实践中对可靠性的担忧。我们使用1.5 T和3t西门子扫描仪对15名健康志愿者的45对CMR T1图进行了回顾性分析。人工左心室心肌分割和基于蒙特卡罗Dropout的深度学习模型生成了具有不同变异性水平的掩模,并从每个感兴趣区域(ROI)提取了1023个rtf。再现性:从1.5 T和3 T图像中提取的rtf的一致性程度,重复性:在相同场强下多次分割运行中提取的rtf的一致性程度,通过类内相关系数(ICC)来衡量。我们将ICC值分为优秀、良好、中等和差。我们报告了属于每个类别的rtf的比例。具有优异重复性的rtf的比例随着ROI像素在分割运行中的一致性比例的降低而降低。高达31%的rtf表现出出色的可重复性,而35%的rtf在手动生成掩码的分割运行中表现出良好的可重复性。在所有扫描仪中(即1.5 T vs 3t),只有7%表现出良好的再现性。虽然我们的研究结果表明RTF对场强和分割可变性的敏感性,但我们确定了某些预处理滤波器和特征类,它们对这些变化不太敏感,因此可能是成像生物标志物或构建机器学习模型的良好候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1