Depression and Distress Screening in Oncology Patients: A Descriptive Analysis.

Chelsey R Ali, Alexander M Litvintchouk, Patrick Moeller, Raegan Davis, Emma Hannan, Vittorio Maio, Valerie P Csik
{"title":"Depression and Distress Screening in Oncology Patients: A Descriptive Analysis.","authors":"Chelsey R Ali, Alexander M Litvintchouk, Patrick Moeller, Raegan Davis, Emma Hannan, Vittorio Maio, Valerie P Csik","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study aimed to describe the characteristics of cancer patients undergoing depression and distress screening at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and to assess factors associated with their screening results. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records of adult Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center patients with at least one oncology encounter between January 2021 and June 2022, who underwent both depression and distress screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2/9 for depression and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer for distress during the encounter. Demographics, clinical factors, and screening results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. A total of 1954 cancer patients were screened for psychological needs. Of these, 110 (5.6%) screened positive for depression and 830 (42.5%) screened positive for distress. About 69.1% of patients who screened positive for depression also screened positive for distress. Conversely, 9.2% of patients who screened positive for distress also screened positive for depression. Cancer patients >65 years old were found significantly less likely to screen positive for both distress and depression, while males were found significantly less likely to screen positive for distress. African American patients were found to be significantly more likely than White patients to screen positive for both distress and depression (odds ratio: 2.58; confidence interval: 1:53-4.34). In this study, a higher proportion of cancer patients were found to be distressed than depressed, suggesting that the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer may be a more useful tool in identifying psychosocial concerns in this population. Differences in depression and distress scores were significantly associated with age, sex, and race. These findings highlight the need for the implementation of effective screening strategies to better address the psychosocial needs of cancer patients. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and assess the impact of distress screening on patient outcomes across various oncology settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to describe the characteristics of cancer patients undergoing depression and distress screening at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center and to assess factors associated with their screening results. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records of adult Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center patients with at least one oncology encounter between January 2021 and June 2022, who underwent both depression and distress screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2/9 for depression and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer for distress during the encounter. Demographics, clinical factors, and screening results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. A total of 1954 cancer patients were screened for psychological needs. Of these, 110 (5.6%) screened positive for depression and 830 (42.5%) screened positive for distress. About 69.1% of patients who screened positive for depression also screened positive for distress. Conversely, 9.2% of patients who screened positive for distress also screened positive for depression. Cancer patients >65 years old were found significantly less likely to screen positive for both distress and depression, while males were found significantly less likely to screen positive for distress. African American patients were found to be significantly more likely than White patients to screen positive for both distress and depression (odds ratio: 2.58; confidence interval: 1:53-4.34). In this study, a higher proportion of cancer patients were found to be distressed than depressed, suggesting that the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer may be a more useful tool in identifying psychosocial concerns in this population. Differences in depression and distress scores were significantly associated with age, sex, and race. These findings highlight the need for the implementation of effective screening strategies to better address the psychosocial needs of cancer patients. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and assess the impact of distress screening on patient outcomes across various oncology settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤患者抑郁和苦恼筛查:一项描述性分析。
本回顾性研究旨在描述在Sidney Kimmel癌症中心接受抑郁和痛苦筛查的癌症患者的特征,并评估与筛查结果相关的因素。数据来自Sidney Kimmel癌症中心成年患者的电子医疗记录,这些患者在2021年1月至2022年6月期间至少有一次肿瘤就诊,他们在就诊期间使用患者健康问卷-2/9进行抑郁和痛苦筛查,并使用国家综合癌症网络痛苦温度计进行抑郁筛查。采用描述性统计和二元logistic回归分析人口统计学、临床因素和筛查结果。共有1954名癌症患者接受了心理需求筛查。其中,110人(5.6%)抑郁筛查呈阳性,830人(42.5%)抑郁筛查呈阳性。在抑郁症筛查呈阳性的患者中,约有69.1%的人在抑郁筛查中也呈阳性。相反,9.2%的焦虑筛查呈阳性的患者抑郁筛查也呈阳性。年龄在65岁以下的癌症患者在痛苦和抑郁筛查中均呈阳性的可能性明显较低,而男性在痛苦筛查中呈阳性的可能性明显较低。发现非裔美国患者比白人患者更有可能在焦虑和抑郁筛查中呈阳性(优势比:2.58;置信区间:1:53-4.34)。在这项研究中,发现癌症患者感到痛苦的比例高于抑郁的比例,这表明国家综合癌症网络的痛苦温度计可能是识别这一人群中心理社会问题的更有用的工具。抑郁和痛苦得分的差异与年龄、性别和种族显著相关。这些发现强调需要实施有效的筛查策略,以更好地满足癌症患者的心理社会需求。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并评估痛苦筛查对不同肿瘤环境下患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Six-Year Retrospective Look at the Effects of Institutional Quality Improvement Efforts to Reduce CAUTIs. Complications of Ambulatory Procedures: Prevalence and Hospital Outpatient Department Variation. From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption. A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1