Alkalinised lidocaine as an anaesthetic before onabotulinumtoxinA injections. a randomised trial

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1111/bju.16647
Meryam El Issaoui, Marlene Elmelund, Niels Klarskov
{"title":"Alkalinised lidocaine as an anaesthetic before onabotulinumtoxinA injections. a randomised trial","authors":"Meryam El Issaoui, Marlene Elmelund, Niels Klarskov","doi":"10.1111/bju.16647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of intravesical alkalinised lidocaine as an anaesthetic treatment on procedural pain during intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX‐A) injections for overactive bladder.Patients and MethodsThis single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled two period crossover trial was conducted on women scheduled for BTX‐A injections at our outpatient urogynaecology clinic between September 2022 and May 2024. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either alkalinised lidocaine or placebo during the first treatment period. Alkalinised lidocaine solution comprised lidocaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL, 20 mL), sodium hydrogen carbonate (1 mmoL/mL, 10 mL), and sodium chloride (9 g/L, 10 mL). The matching placebo was sodium chloride (9 g/L, 40 mL). The primary outcome measure was procedural pain rated on a 100‐mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included adverse effects such as post‐void residual urine volumes requiring catheterisation, urinary tract infection, haematuria 1 week after treatment, and patient satisfaction measured on a 5‐point scale. During the second treatment period, patients received the alternative intervention.ResultsWe enrolled 50 patients, of which 41 were eligible for per‐protocol analyses. The mean VAS score was significantly lower following intravesical alkalinised lidocaine (mean 21.3 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.7–27.8 mm) compared to placebo (mean 41.6 mm, 95% CI 35.0–48.1 mm) with a mean difference of −20.3 mm (95% CI −29.2 to −11.5 mm; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001). Adverse events and patient satisfaction did not significantly differ between the alkalinised lidocaine and placebo treatments (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.825 and <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.138, respectively).ConclusionsIntravesical instillation of alkalinised lidocaine before BTX‐A injections significantly reduced VAS pain scores compared to placebo (<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\" xlink:href=\"http://clinicaltrials.gov\">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link> identifier: NCT05415865).","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16647","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of intravesical alkalinised lidocaine as an anaesthetic treatment on procedural pain during intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX‐A) injections for overactive bladder.Patients and MethodsThis single‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled two period crossover trial was conducted on women scheduled for BTX‐A injections at our outpatient urogynaecology clinic between September 2022 and May 2024. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either alkalinised lidocaine or placebo during the first treatment period. Alkalinised lidocaine solution comprised lidocaine hydrochloride (20 mg/mL, 20 mL), sodium hydrogen carbonate (1 mmoL/mL, 10 mL), and sodium chloride (9 g/L, 10 mL). The matching placebo was sodium chloride (9 g/L, 40 mL). The primary outcome measure was procedural pain rated on a 100‐mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included adverse effects such as post‐void residual urine volumes requiring catheterisation, urinary tract infection, haematuria 1 week after treatment, and patient satisfaction measured on a 5‐point scale. During the second treatment period, patients received the alternative intervention.ResultsWe enrolled 50 patients, of which 41 were eligible for per‐protocol analyses. The mean VAS score was significantly lower following intravesical alkalinised lidocaine (mean 21.3 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.7–27.8 mm) compared to placebo (mean 41.6 mm, 95% CI 35.0–48.1 mm) with a mean difference of −20.3 mm (95% CI −29.2 to −11.5 mm; P < 0.001). Adverse events and patient satisfaction did not significantly differ between the alkalinised lidocaine and placebo treatments (P = 0.825 and P = 0.138, respectively).ConclusionsIntravesical instillation of alkalinised lidocaine before BTX‐A injections significantly reduced VAS pain scores compared to placebo (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05415865).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碱化利多卡因在肉毒杆菌毒素注射前用作麻醉剂。随机试验
目的探讨膀胱内碱化利多卡因麻醉对膀胱过度活动症患者肌内注射肉毒杆菌毒素A (BTX‐A)时手术性疼痛的影响。患者和方法这项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的两期交叉试验于2022年9月至2024年5月在我们的门诊泌尿妇科诊所进行了BTX - A注射。在第一个治疗期间,患者被随机分配(1:1)接受碱化利多卡因或安慰剂。碱化利多卡因溶液由盐酸利多卡因(20mg /mL, 20ml)、碳酸氢钠(1mmol /mL, 10ml)、氯化钠(9g /L, 10ml)组成。配套安慰剂为氯化钠(9 g/L, 40 mL)。主要结局指标是100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评定的程序性疼痛。次要结局包括不良反应,如需要导尿的空后残留尿量、尿路感染、治疗后1周血尿,以及以5分制测量的患者满意度。在第二个治疗期,患者接受替代干预。结果:我们纳入了50例患者,其中41例符合每个方案分析的条件。膀胱内碱化利多卡因VAS评分(平均21.3 mm, 95%可信区间[CI] 14.7-27.8 mm)显著低于安慰剂(平均41.6 mm, 95% CI 35.0-48.1 mm),平均差异为- 20.3 mm (95% CI - 29.2至- 11.5 mm;P & lt;0.001)。碱化利多卡因和安慰剂治疗的不良事件和患者满意度无显著差异(P = 0.825和P = 0.138)。结论:与安慰剂相比,BTX‐A注射前膀胱内灌注碱化利多卡因可显著降低VAS疼痛评分(ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT05415865)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
The perioperative outcomes of papillary versus non-papillary access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy Key ingredients for running a randomised controlled trial in a surgical day unit Understanding patient perspectives in the management of their muscle-invasive bladder cancer Bladder EpiCheck clinical utility to predict BCG response in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer Functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1