Semi-Supervised Learning Allows for Improved Segmentation With Reduced Annotations of Brain Metastases Using Multicenter MRI Data.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29686
Jon André Ottesen, Elizabeth Tong, Kyrre Eeg Emblem, Anna Latysheva, Greg Zaharchuk, Atle Bjørnerud, Endre Grøvik
{"title":"Semi-Supervised Learning Allows for Improved Segmentation With Reduced Annotations of Brain Metastases Using Multicenter MRI Data.","authors":"Jon André Ottesen, Elizabeth Tong, Kyrre Eeg Emblem, Anna Latysheva, Greg Zaharchuk, Atle Bjørnerud, Endre Grøvik","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning-based segmentation of brain metastases relies on large amounts of fully annotated data by domain experts. Semi-supervised learning offers potential efficient methods to improve model performance without excessive annotation burden.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work tests the viability of semi-supervision for brain metastases segmentation.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>There were 156, 65, 324, and 200 labeled scans from four institutions and 519 unlabeled scans from a single institution. All subjects included in the study had diagnosed with brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequences: </strong>1.5 T and 3 T, 2D and 3D T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR).</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Three semi-supervision methods (mean teacher, cross-pseudo supervision, and interpolation consistency training) were adapted with the U-Net architecture. The three semi-supervised methods were compared to their respective supervised baseline on the full and half-sized training.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Evaluation was performed on a multinational test set from four different institutions using 5-fold cross-validation. Method performance was evaluated by the following: the number of false-positive predictions, the number of true positive predictions, the 95th Hausdorff distance, and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Significance was tested using a paired samples t test for a single fold, and across all folds within a given cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Semi-supervision outperformed the supervised baseline for all sites with the best-performing semi-supervised method achieved an on average DSC improvement of 6.3% ± 1.6%, 8.2% ± 3.8%, 8.6% ± 2.6%, and 15.4% ± 1.4%, when trained on half the dataset and 3.6% ± 0.7%, 2.0% ± 1.5%, 1.8% ± 5.7%, and 4.7% ± 1.7%, compared to the supervised baseline on four test cohorts. In addition, in three of four datasets, the semi-supervised training produced equal or better results than the supervised models trained on twice the labeled data.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>Semi-supervised learning allows for improved segmentation performance over the supervised baseline, and the improvement was particularly notable for independent external test sets when trained on small amounts of labeled data.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Artificial intelligence requires extensive datasets with large amounts of annotated data from medical experts which can be difficult to acquire due to the large workload. To compensate for this, it is possible to utilize large amounts of un-annotated clinical data in addition to annotated data. However, this method has not been widely tested for the most common intracranial brain tumor, brain metastases. This study shows that this approach allows for data efficient deep learning models across multiple institutions with different clinical protocols and scanners.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep learning-based segmentation of brain metastases relies on large amounts of fully annotated data by domain experts. Semi-supervised learning offers potential efficient methods to improve model performance without excessive annotation burden.

Purpose: This work tests the viability of semi-supervision for brain metastases segmentation.

Study type: Retrospective.

Subjects: There were 156, 65, 324, and 200 labeled scans from four institutions and 519 unlabeled scans from a single institution. All subjects included in the study had diagnosed with brain metastases.

Field strength/sequences: 1.5 T and 3 T, 2D and 3D T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR).

Assessment: Three semi-supervision methods (mean teacher, cross-pseudo supervision, and interpolation consistency training) were adapted with the U-Net architecture. The three semi-supervised methods were compared to their respective supervised baseline on the full and half-sized training.

Statistical tests: Evaluation was performed on a multinational test set from four different institutions using 5-fold cross-validation. Method performance was evaluated by the following: the number of false-positive predictions, the number of true positive predictions, the 95th Hausdorff distance, and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Significance was tested using a paired samples t test for a single fold, and across all folds within a given cohort.

Results: Semi-supervision outperformed the supervised baseline for all sites with the best-performing semi-supervised method achieved an on average DSC improvement of 6.3% ± 1.6%, 8.2% ± 3.8%, 8.6% ± 2.6%, and 15.4% ± 1.4%, when trained on half the dataset and 3.6% ± 0.7%, 2.0% ± 1.5%, 1.8% ± 5.7%, and 4.7% ± 1.7%, compared to the supervised baseline on four test cohorts. In addition, in three of four datasets, the semi-supervised training produced equal or better results than the supervised models trained on twice the labeled data.

Data conclusion: Semi-supervised learning allows for improved segmentation performance over the supervised baseline, and the improvement was particularly notable for independent external test sets when trained on small amounts of labeled data.

Plain language summary: Artificial intelligence requires extensive datasets with large amounts of annotated data from medical experts which can be difficult to acquire due to the large workload. To compensate for this, it is possible to utilize large amounts of un-annotated clinical data in addition to annotated data. However, this method has not been widely tested for the most common intracranial brain tumor, brain metastases. This study shows that this approach allows for data efficient deep learning models across multiple institutions with different clinical protocols and scanners.

Level of evidence: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
半监督学习允许改进分割与减少注释脑转移使用多中心MRI数据。
背景:基于深度学习的脑转移瘤分割依赖于领域专家提供的大量完整注释数据。半监督学习提供了潜在的有效方法来提高模型性能,而不需要过多的注释负担。目的:研究半监督在脑转移瘤分割中的可行性。研究类型:回顾性。受试者:有来自4个机构的156、65、324和200个标记扫描和来自单个机构的519个未标记扫描。研究中的所有受试者都被诊断为脑转移。场强/序列:1.5 T和3t, 2D和3D t1加权对比前后,以及流体衰减反演恢复(FLAIR)。评估:采用U-Net架构的三种半监督方法(平均教师、交叉伪监督和插值一致性训练)。将三种半监督方法与它们各自的监督基线在完整和半大小的训练中进行比较。统计检验:对来自四个不同机构的多国检验集进行评估,采用5倍交叉验证。通过假阳性预测数、真阳性预测数、第95 Hausdorff距离和Dice相似系数(DSC)来评价方法的性能。使用配对样本t检验对单个折叠进行显著性检验,并在给定队列内的所有折叠中进行显著性检验。结果:与四个测试队列的监督基线相比,在一半数据集上训练时,半监督方法的平均DSC提高了6.3%±1.6%,8.2%±3.8%,8.6%±2.6%和15.4%±1.4%,分别为3.6%±0.7%,2.0%±1.5%,1.8%±5.7%和4.7%±1.7%。此外,在四分之三的数据集中,半监督训练产生的结果与在两倍标记数据上训练的监督模型相同或更好。数据结论:半监督学习允许在监督基线上改进分割性能,并且当在少量标记数据上训练时,对于独立的外部测试集的改进尤其显着。简单的语言总结:人工智能需要广泛的数据集,其中包含来自医学专家的大量带注释的数据,由于工作量大,这些数据很难获得。为了弥补这一点,除了有注释的数据外,还可以利用大量未注释的临床数据。然而,这种方法尚未广泛用于最常见的颅内脑肿瘤——脑转移瘤。这项研究表明,这种方法允许跨多个具有不同临床协议和扫描仪的机构的数据高效深度学习模型。证据水平:3技术功效:第2阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial for "Diagnosis of Sacroiliitis Through Semi-Supervised Segmentation and Radiomics Feature Analysis of MRI Images". Myocardial MRI Cine Radiomics: A Novel Approach to Risk-Stratification for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Issue Information Deep Learning-Based Techniques in Glioma Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Multi-Parametric MRI: A Review on Clinical Applications and Future Outlooks MRI Assessment of Geometric Microstructural Changes of White Matter in Infants With Periventricular White Matter Injury and Spastic Cerebral Palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1