The Association Between Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics and Severe Infections After Cochlear Implantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004393
Thomas Hudlebusch Meldgaard, Martin Abou Taha, Christian Emil Faber, Jesper Roed Sorensen
{"title":"The Association Between Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics and Severe Infections After Cochlear Implantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Thomas Hudlebusch Meldgaard, Martin Abou Taha, Christian Emil Faber, Jesper Roed Sorensen","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of infections leading to implant explantation or hospitalization, with a follow-up of up to 12 years.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary medical institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult patients (≥18 yr) receiving cochlear implant surgery between 2010 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Postoperative oral prophylactic antibiotic treatment for 4 to 10 days.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The medical records of patients receiving cochlear implants were assessed (n = 927). Two groups were formed: group A, receiving postoperative oral antibiotic treatment (period: 2010-2015) (n = 526), and group B, not receiving postoperative oral antibiotic treatment (period: 2016-2022) (n = 401). The two groups were compared regarding infections leading to hospitalization or explantation, and baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 28 patients (3.0%) had infections requiring explantation or hospitalization. Of these, 13 were explantations (1.4%). The infection rate in group A was 2.9%, compared with 3.2% in group B, with an odds ratio of 1.2 in group B (p = 0.646). Group B had a 2.2 odds ratio of explantation caused by infection compared with group A (p = 0.179). We observed a significant correlation between severe infections in patients previously having otologic surgery (7.7%, p = 0.011) and in patients with previous issues of chronic otitis (16.7%, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Occurrence of postoperative infection leading to explantation and hospitalization was not significantly associated with the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, infections were higher in patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, despite having a lower risk of postoperative infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 2","pages":"133-139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the association between postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of infections leading to implant explantation or hospitalization, with a follow-up of up to 12 years.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary medical institution.

Patients: Adult patients (≥18 yr) receiving cochlear implant surgery between 2010 and 2022.

Intervention: Postoperative oral prophylactic antibiotic treatment for 4 to 10 days.

Main outcome measures: The medical records of patients receiving cochlear implants were assessed (n = 927). Two groups were formed: group A, receiving postoperative oral antibiotic treatment (period: 2010-2015) (n = 526), and group B, not receiving postoperative oral antibiotic treatment (period: 2016-2022) (n = 401). The two groups were compared regarding infections leading to hospitalization or explantation, and baseline characteristics.

Results: In total, 28 patients (3.0%) had infections requiring explantation or hospitalization. Of these, 13 were explantations (1.4%). The infection rate in group A was 2.9%, compared with 3.2% in group B, with an odds ratio of 1.2 in group B (p = 0.646). Group B had a 2.2 odds ratio of explantation caused by infection compared with group A (p = 0.179). We observed a significant correlation between severe infections in patients previously having otologic surgery (7.7%, p = 0.011) and in patients with previous issues of chronic otitis (16.7%, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: Occurrence of postoperative infection leading to explantation and hospitalization was not significantly associated with the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. However, infections were higher in patients not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis, despite having a lower risk of postoperative infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工耳蜗植入术后预防性抗生素与严重感染的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:通过长达12年的随访,探讨术后抗生素预防与导致种植体拔出或住院的感染风险之间的关系。研究设计:回顾性队列研究。单位:三级医疗机构。患者:2010年至2022年间接受人工耳蜗手术的成年患者(≥18岁)。干预措施:术后口服预防性抗生素治疗4 ~ 10天。主要观察指标:评估接受人工耳蜗植入患者的病历(n = 927)。分为A组,术后口服抗生素治疗组(2010-2015)(n = 526); B组,术后未口服抗生素治疗组(2016-2022)(n = 401)。两组比较了导致住院或移植的感染以及基线特征。结果:共有28例(3.0%)患者发生感染,需要手术切除或住院治疗。其中,解释13例(1.4%)。A组感染率为2.9%,B组感染率为3.2%,优势比为1.2 (p = 0.646)。与a组相比,B组感染引起的外植体的优势比为2.2 (p = 0.179)。我们观察到曾经做过耳科手术的患者的严重感染(7.7%,p = 0.011)和曾经有过慢性中耳炎的患者的严重感染(16.7%,p = 0.005)之间存在显著的相关性。结论:术后感染导致拔牙住院与术后抗生素预防使用无显著相关性。然而,尽管术后感染风险较低,但未接受抗生素预防治疗的患者感染率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Perioperative Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Hearing Preservation Outcomes. Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers Prevent Vestibular Schwannoma-Associated Hearing Loss. Detection of Extracochlear Electrodes Using Electrical Field Imaging (EFI). Preclinical Study of a Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implant Device Based on 3D Printing of a Custom Guide. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: 3-Year Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1