Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss: Which Genes Next?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004423
Ryan J Carlson, Shahar Taiber, Jay T Rubinstein
{"title":"Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss: Which Genes Next?","authors":"Ryan J Carlson, Shahar Taiber, Jay T Rubinstein","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans, and roughly half of childhood-onset sensorineural hearing loss is genetic. Advances in gene therapy techniques have led to the first clinical trials for OTOF-associated hearing loss DFNB9. Therapies for other hearing loss genes are in various stages of development, and therefore a comprehensive evaluation of potential candidate genes can help to prioritize and guide these efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of 93 nonsyndromic hearing loss genes with consensus support was generated. Critical factors for evaluation were identified as gene size, timing of cochlear degradation, cell type(s) of primary expression, availability of mouse models and efficacy of adeno-associated virus experiments in those mice, and human hearing loss severity, onset, and prevalence. Each factor was addressed with gene-specific PubMed searches for applicable studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each gene was evaluated according to the above factors, with favorable results indicating the most promising candidates for gene therapy. Genes that satisfied all the above conditions included TMPRSS3, PCDH15, and TMC1. Other genes, such as LOXHD1 and MYO6, had not yet had gene replacement attempts in a mouse model but otherwise satisfied all conditions and were likewise identified as promising candidates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this analysis, hearing loss genes vary widely in terms of their favorability for treatment by gene therapy approaches. Targeting development efforts to promising candidates will ensure the highest likelihood of clinical success. Several genes were identified as appealing next targets, signaling an increasing role of gene therapies in hearing loss care moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":"46 3","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004423","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans, and roughly half of childhood-onset sensorineural hearing loss is genetic. Advances in gene therapy techniques have led to the first clinical trials for OTOF-associated hearing loss DFNB9. Therapies for other hearing loss genes are in various stages of development, and therefore a comprehensive evaluation of potential candidate genes can help to prioritize and guide these efforts.

Methods: A list of 93 nonsyndromic hearing loss genes with consensus support was generated. Critical factors for evaluation were identified as gene size, timing of cochlear degradation, cell type(s) of primary expression, availability of mouse models and efficacy of adeno-associated virus experiments in those mice, and human hearing loss severity, onset, and prevalence. Each factor was addressed with gene-specific PubMed searches for applicable studies.

Results: Each gene was evaluated according to the above factors, with favorable results indicating the most promising candidates for gene therapy. Genes that satisfied all the above conditions included TMPRSS3, PCDH15, and TMC1. Other genes, such as LOXHD1 and MYO6, had not yet had gene replacement attempts in a mouse model but otherwise satisfied all conditions and were likewise identified as promising candidates.

Conclusion: Based on this analysis, hearing loss genes vary widely in terms of their favorability for treatment by gene therapy approaches. Targeting development efforts to promising candidates will ensure the highest likelihood of clinical success. Several genes were identified as appealing next targets, signaling an increasing role of gene therapies in hearing loss care moving forward.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力损失的基因治疗:下一步是哪些基因?
听力损失是人类最常见的感觉缺陷,大约一半的儿童期发病感音神经性听力损失是遗传的。基因治疗技术的进步导致了首个耳聋相关听力损失DFNB9的临床试验。其他听力损失基因的治疗方法处于不同的发展阶段,因此对潜在候选基因的全面评估可以帮助确定优先级并指导这些努力。方法:对93个具有一致支持的非综合征性听力损失基因进行筛选。评估的关键因素包括基因大小、耳蜗退化的时间、主要表达的细胞类型、小鼠模型的可用性和在这些小鼠中进行腺相关病毒实验的有效性,以及人类听力损失的严重程度、发病和流行程度。每个因素都通过特定基因的PubMed搜索来解决。结果:根据上述因素对每个基因进行评估,结果较好,表明最有希望进行基因治疗的候选基因。满足上述条件的基因包括TMPRSS3、PCDH15和TMC1。其他基因,如LOXHD1和MYO6,尚未在小鼠模型中进行基因替换尝试,但在其他方面满足所有条件,同样被确定为有希望的候选基因。结论:基于这一分析,听力损失基因在基因治疗方法的有利性方面存在很大差异。针对有希望的候选药物的开发工作将确保临床成功的最高可能性。几个基因被确定为有吸引力的下一个目标,标志着基因治疗在听力损失护理中的作用越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Highlights from CI 2024 Vancouver International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Technologies: Symposium Organized by American Cochlear Implant Alliance (ACI Alliance). Monocular Surface Reconstructions in Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery: A Phantom Feasibility Study. Current Evidence on Medical Therapy for Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. A Comparative Utility Study of Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Preoperative Assessment of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates. Petrous Apex Chondrosarcoma With Postobstructive Tympanomastoid Cholesterol Granuloma: Why T1 Precontrast Sequences Still Matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1