"Comparison of the efficacy of Erich arch bars, IMF screws and SMART Lock Hybrid arch bars in the management of mandibular fractures- A Randomized clinical study".
Revanth Kumar Salavadi, Jangam Sowmya, Baswa Mani Kumari, Kavitha P Kamath, Pradeep S Anand, Nambi Muni Roopesh Kumar, Pranavi Jadhav
{"title":"\"Comparison of the efficacy of Erich arch bars, IMF screws and SMART Lock Hybrid arch bars in the management of mandibular fractures- A Randomized clinical study\".","authors":"Revanth Kumar Salavadi, Jangam Sowmya, Baswa Mani Kumari, Kavitha P Kamath, Pradeep S Anand, Nambi Muni Roopesh Kumar, Pranavi Jadhav","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of Erich Arch Bar (EAB), Inter Maxillary Fixation (IMF) screws and SMART Lock Hybrid arch bar (HABs) in the treatment of mandibular fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out in the Department of Dentistry at ESIC Hospital in Hyderabad from August 2021 to August 2023. The study comprised of three groups (EAB group (31), IMF screw group (33) and HABs group (29)).Primary outcome variable was occlusal stability. Secondary outcome variables were time taken to apply the device, glove perforation, oral hygiene assessment by Modified Turskey Gilmore Plaque index, Quality of life (QOL) assessment by General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), mucosal growth and dental injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average application time for EAB, IMF screws and HABs was 78 min, 15 min and 19 min respectively. No significant difference was noticed in occlusal stability at the end of 1 week and 4 weeks follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in instances of dental injury among the three groups. However, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the time taken to apply, glove perforation, oral hygiene levels, mucosal overgrowth and total GOHAI score among the 3 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HABs and IMF screws may be recommended over EABfor MMF inmandibular dentate segment fracture management due to their advantages including quick application, enhanced occlusal stability, and QOL, all of which are required for a better functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the efficacy of Erich Arch Bar (EAB), Inter Maxillary Fixation (IMF) screws and SMART Lock Hybrid arch bar (HABs) in the treatment of mandibular fractures.
Materials and methods: A prospective randomized clinical study was carried out in the Department of Dentistry at ESIC Hospital in Hyderabad from August 2021 to August 2023. The study comprised of three groups (EAB group (31), IMF screw group (33) and HABs group (29)).Primary outcome variable was occlusal stability. Secondary outcome variables were time taken to apply the device, glove perforation, oral hygiene assessment by Modified Turskey Gilmore Plaque index, Quality of life (QOL) assessment by General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI), mucosal growth and dental injuries.
Results: The average application time for EAB, IMF screws and HABs was 78 min, 15 min and 19 min respectively. No significant difference was noticed in occlusal stability at the end of 1 week and 4 weeks follow-up period. There was no statistically significant difference in instances of dental injury among the three groups. However, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) in the time taken to apply, glove perforation, oral hygiene levels, mucosal overgrowth and total GOHAI score among the 3 groups.
Conclusion: HABs and IMF screws may be recommended over EABfor MMF inmandibular dentate segment fracture management due to their advantages including quick application, enhanced occlusal stability, and QOL, all of which are required for a better functional outcome.
期刊介绍：
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
