A meta-analysis of eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in young, middle-aged, and late middle-aged adults with obesity or overweight.

IF 8 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1111/obr.13898
Seungmin Lee, Soyeon Ahn, Priya Patel, Nicholas D Myers
{"title":"A meta-analysis of eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in young, middle-aged, and late middle-aged adults with obesity or overweight.","authors":"Seungmin Lee, Soyeon Ahn, Priya Patel, Nicholas D Myers","doi":"10.1111/obr.13898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to calculate the effects of recent eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in young, middle-aged, and late middle-aged adults with obesity or overweight. This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. In the search, 3550 articles were identified, and 15 studies met all inclusion criteria. The effects of recent eHealth interventions depended on the type of outcome variable: (a) intensity-based physical activity (e.g., moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity, average minutes per day from intensity categories, steps per day) or (b) energy expenditure-based physical activity (e.g., metabolic equivalent of task, kilocalories per week). The overall effects of recent eHealth interventions on the physical activity outcomes in adults with obesity were positive and ranged from small to medium in size. Ethnicity and weight status moderated the effects of recent eHealth interventions on physical activity outcomes. Results from this meta-analysis provided some evidence for both the utility of, and possible improvements to, eHealth interventions to promote health-enhancing physical activity in at-risk populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":216,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"e13898"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to calculate the effects of recent eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in young, middle-aged, and late middle-aged adults with obesity or overweight. This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. In the search, 3550 articles were identified, and 15 studies met all inclusion criteria. The effects of recent eHealth interventions depended on the type of outcome variable: (a) intensity-based physical activity (e.g., moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity, average minutes per day from intensity categories, steps per day) or (b) energy expenditure-based physical activity (e.g., metabolic equivalent of task, kilocalories per week). The overall effects of recent eHealth interventions on the physical activity outcomes in adults with obesity were positive and ranged from small to medium in size. Ethnicity and weight status moderated the effects of recent eHealth interventions on physical activity outcomes. Results from this meta-analysis provided some evidence for both the utility of, and possible improvements to, eHealth interventions to promote health-enhancing physical activity in at-risk populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子健康干预促进年轻、中年和中老年肥胖或超重成年人身体活动的荟萃分析。
本研究的目的是计算最近的电子健康干预措施对促进年轻、中年和中老年肥胖或超重成年人的身体活动的影响。本荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。在检索中,确定了3550篇文章,其中15篇研究符合所有纳入标准。最近的电子健康干预措施的效果取决于结果变量的类型:(a)基于强度的身体活动(例如,中等至高强度的身体活动,强度类别每天平均分钟数,每天步数)或(b)基于能量消耗的身体活动(例如,任务的代谢当量,每周千卡)。最近的电子健康干预措施对肥胖成人身体活动结果的总体影响是积极的,影响范围从小到中等。种族和体重状况缓和了近期电子健康干预对身体活动结果的影响。本荟萃分析的结果为电子健康干预措施的效用和可能的改进提供了一些证据,以促进高危人群中增强健康的身体活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Seismicity patterns before strong earthquakes in Greece
IF 2.3 4区 地球科学Acta GeophysicaPub Date : 2009-03-12 DOI: 10.2478/s11600-009-0004-y
Vassilis Karakostas
Seismicity patterns before strong earthquakes in Greece
IF 2.3 4区 地球科学Acta GeophysicaPub Date : 2009-03-12 DOI: 10.2478/S11600-009-0004-Y
V. Karakostas
来源期刊
Obesity Reviews
Obesity Reviews 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Obesity Reviews is a monthly journal publishing reviews on all disciplines related to obesity and its comorbidities. This includes basic and behavioral sciences, clinical treatment and outcomes, epidemiology, prevention and public health. The journal should, therefore, appeal to all professionals with an interest in obesity and its comorbidities. Review types may include systematic narrative reviews, quantitative meta-analyses and narrative reviews but all must offer new insights, critical or novel perspectives that will enhance the state of knowledge in the field. The editorial policy is to publish high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts that provide needed new insight into all aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities while minimizing the period between submission and publication.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary esophageal physiological testing for primary esophageal motility disorder (PEMD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) before bariatric surgery: A systematic literature review. Diet-focused behavioral interventions to reduce the risk of non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of existing evidence. Measurement and evaluation of community engagement in complex, chronic medical conditions: HIV and obesity as exemplar conditions. Stakeholder views of behavioral interventions for children and adolescents with obesity: Mega-ethnography of qualitative syntheses. The effect of dietary weight-loss interventions on the inflammatory markers interleukin-6 and TNF-alpha in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1